search for: stealthed

...the two-interface example. My question regards the result of a "internet test scan" that I found via google search...when I run the "Stealth Scan" at: http://scan.sygate.com/stealthscan.html ...it reports ports 80,110,113,139,443,445,1080,8080 as being "closed, but not stealthed, and therefore possibly vulnerable to a TCP/IP stack vulnerability, even though no service is running on the port" (I''m paraphrasing the actual message) This is a redhat linux 8.0 box, kept up2date. Just out of curiosity, should these ports be showing up stealthed or not? If so,...

help!....im really confused, ... i created the user "Stealth" on my Linux redhat 7.3 machine and when i configure my smb.conf file, for path = /home/Stealth, the machine would show up in "Computers Near Me" on my other windoez 2000 machine, but would not accept any passwords to the [share], when i run smbpasswd -a Stealth i get this......... getsmbfilepwent: malformed

Stealth Communications Announces Registry to Avoid Access Fees Posted on: 04/23/2004 Stealth Communications Inc. today announced the official launch of a registry that allows service providers routing calls over the Internet to avoid paying local phone companies access charges. The VPF ENUM Registry allows carriers to map telephone numbers to IP addresses for such things as SIP phones and

I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that be happening? Miark

Hi, in FreeBSD kernel is options that make router stealth, packet passed throw router have no change in TTL value. Is a posibility to make similar thing in Linux, I think that in traceroute isn''t this hop, no asteris, no router, no change in TTL, nothing ...? PSIkappa psi@atlantis.sk

Hello, I would normally not write this list to announce an update to a software package, however there have been a number of very significant changes to this program that users of it may want to upgrade and new users may want to check out. What it is =-=-=-=-=- Sentry is a port scan detector for Linux, *BSD, and most UNIX variants. What it does =-=-=-=-=-=- Sentry monitors your systems for

Hi. Is it possible to set up a stealth firewall with 2.4.3 + iptables? I know there are patches for 2.2.x kernel (to enable bridge for using ipchains). Does 2.4.x directly support it? TIA. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= ** RoMaN SoFt / LLFB ** roman@madrid.com http://pagina.de/romansoft ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hi, I''m a home user who doesn''t understand the workings of the Shorewall firewall (or the linux OS on which I''ve just installed it) very well. Having just installed Shorewall 1.4.6c with a default "home user" configuration I gave it a run against the online ShieldsUp scan. Main surprise was that the ICMP echo was enabled. I''ve since gone into

here is a copy of my smb.conf file [Stealth@Nooblesse Stealth]$ cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = Tightwork server string = samba server hosts allow = all log level = 2 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/samba.log security = share # encrypt passwords = yes ## some printer settings printcap name = /etc/printcap

Zac, Thanks for the input. This would cover it, however it is not stealth. In some cases, you may want it to be stealth. Again, my state allows me to do this, but some states do not. I've done a little searching and could not find an answer. Basically, to simplify the question: When is it legal to record interstate calls without giving notice, when the recording party is in a one-party

----- Forwarded message from Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> ----- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 11:37:42 -0700 From: Louis Kowolowski <louisk@bend.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: snort, postgres, bridge User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i I've been prowling through the FreeBSD and Snort list archives in search of information on setting up snort on a FreeBSD bridge(4) that logs

Dear R users/developers, I am posting on behalf of a friend who is looking for R developers. The requirements are : - Available to work/re-locate to Bangalore, India - Over 5 - 6 years of solid R experience is essential - The ideal candidate should have worked on regression modeling and predictive models - Experience using Big Data technologies (like Hadoop)

...n from grc.com on the firewall, i.e. a scan of the external interface. I m a little suprised at the results. On the firewall i have postfix running ( smtp port 26 ), openssh ( ssh port 22) and port forwarding of port 85 (on the firewall ) to an internal host. The Shields-Up scan shows port 26 as stealthed , port 22 as open and port 85 open as well. Port 113 ( ident auth ) was listed as close. My questions: 1. Why is the smtp port stealthed whilst other are open? 2. What about port 113 ? Any issues / comments. How do i get rid of it? regards, marco. _____________________________________...

Dear all, I'm using a Virtual Machine with Ubuntu 18.04 at VIrtualBox and I'm trying to build the LLVM project from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git. This VM has 6 cores (from an intel core i-7 8th gen), 11GB of RAM and 300GB of storage (from a 1TB HDD) at a laptop, this is the model: MSI GS63 Stealth 8RE. Then, I'm doing exactly that this tutorial says to build LLVM:

Dear All: I have several boxes that up and running just great, then we changed internet equipment due to a lightning strike, now all my inbound IAX connections (iax2 show peers) have unknown status. If I log into the remote boxes, it says "Request sent." The authentications haven't changed at all, and all the iax.conf settings are correct. It looks like a firewall issue, but

hi, can i use shorewall with configured stealth match. it described as followed: Enabling this option will drop all syn packets coming to unserved tcp ports as well as all packets coming to unserved udp ports. If you are using your system to route any type of packets (ie. via NAT) you should put this module at the end of your ruleset, since it will drop packets that aren''t going to

...> Cheers. > > ********************************************************************** > I have shorewall up and running on my system. (GNU-Linux Mandrake 9) > > When I tested my firewall at grc.com, Shields-Up informs me that ports > 113 and 135 are closed and not ''stealthed'' > > When reading the faq on the Shorewall site I saw that shorewall rejects > rather than denys connection requests on ''TCP ports 113, 135, 137 and > 139 as well as UDP ports 137-139''. > > The file /etc/shorewall/common.def advises me not to edit the...

ebook.best2web.com Free Download Beginner's Guide to Starting a Web Site Totally Free Web Resources Unlimited Profits 7 Secrets To Unlimited Traffic Scientific Advertising How to Start Your Own Traffic Virus Marketing Warriors Tips eBookoMatic eBook Submitter The Best of Web Gold On Line Stealth Marketing ebook.best2web.com steven@best2web.com

im trying to compile wine (wine-2003.03.03.18.tgz) when i run wine i get wine: chdir to /tmp/.wine-stealth/server-341-21c005 : No such file or directory i am using redhat 9, and i have read some docs i think i was suppose to compile with --with-nptl, witch i did but still no go... please help

Using Shorewall v1.2, and testing the firewall using scan.sygate.com, I am informed that several ports (web (80), ident (113) and DCE locator (135) are ''closed'' rather than ''blocked''. All other ports show as blocked or ''stealthed''. I haven''t set up any rules or policies that have anything to do with 80, 113 or 135. Is this normal shorewall behaviour or have I possibly mis-configured something? By the way, I''ve been playing with a variety of Linux firewall tools for several years and Shorewa...