search for: sooooooooooooo

...rrespondence analysis. I feel like I have read everything and it is still not explaining why the error message keeps coming up, I have used the exact examples I have seen in articles and the same error keeps popping up: Error in sum(N) : invalid 'type' (character) of argument I have spent sooooooooooooo long trying to figure this out without success, I am sure it has to do with the fact that my rows have names in them. I have attached the text file I have been using and if you have any ideas as to how I can get R to plot the data using correspondence analysis with the column and row names that wo...

...parallel stem-and-leaf displays in R, yet there seems to be no specific command nor info in the archive that I can depend on. Specifically, there are two batches of data that I want to put together in parallel stem-and-leaf displays. Would anyone help me figure out how to do this in R? Thank you sooooooooooooo much! Jin [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

2017-06-13 17:49 GMT+02:00 Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro>: > On 06/13/2017 05:48 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > Hi Manuel > > > Hi Arno > > Hi Manuel > > > 2017-06-07 14:40 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > >> On Jun 7, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Manuel Wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> >> wrote:

...did not manage to include the manpages in the final rpms because the new configure script insists on using tools not available on CentOS 6 ( a newer asciidoc, for a start ) and I was too lazy to just include the pages as they are. Why did you change that towards 2.7.4, oooh why ? It was working sooooooooooooo fine.... FWIW, I modified the spec to create a separate subpackage for the augeas lenses/modules -- those did not seem to exists in 2.7.4. If anyone wishes to toy with the spec or rpm packages I will be happy to share them. Regards, manuel -------------- next part -----...

...o include the manpages in the final > rpms because the new configure script insists on using tools not available > on CentOS 6 ( a newer asciidoc, for a start ) and I was too lazy to just > include the pages as they are. Why did you change that towards 2.7.4, oooh > why ? It was working sooooooooooooo fine.... > my mems fails to recall that specific point, but it was on purpose, not to bother users... FWIW, I modified the spec to create a separate subpackage for the > augeas lenses/modules -- those did not seem to exists in 2.7.4. If anyone > wishes to toy with the spec or rpm pac...