search for: slooow

As part of routine testing, I run clang and llvm-gcc a lot of times. Something happened between r83681 and r84167 such that clang-cc and cc1 became many hundreds of times slower when asked to perform optimizations. Is this a known issue? These are all release builds on Ubuntu Jaunty on x86. During these long runs, memory usage creeps up slowly at maybe 1 MB per minute. Thanks, John Regehr

My InlineCost refactoring has been noticed in this aspect; that may or may notbe the culprit here. A quick thing you can do is to compile with -ftime-report and compare the top few passes between versions. Dan On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:47 PM, John Regehr <regehr at cs.utah.edu> wrote: > As part of routine testing, I run clang and llvm-gcc a lot of times. > Something happened

...if I truss the smbd for such a slow connection I get a mess of smb messages being exchanged prior to the requested browsing information. On a quick WindowsXP connection's truss I do not see any of this "pre-dialogue". I have not a glue. Thanks for any help. Roman __________________________________________________________________ The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available.

Hello, My samba server uses winbind and contains a [homes] section for the active directory users logging into the domain. Each user profile is pointing to the samba server for its "home directory" When XP clients login however, moving around the desktop is extremely slow, (after double clicking my computer, one has to wait 30 seconds or more) It seems to be attributed to the

Hello all, Has anyone used the SIP version of this phone with Asterisk? I see Polycom has a H.323 and MGCP version also, does anyone know if you flash the phone to swith protocols? Thanks in advance for the info. Ed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031029/a9377305/attachment.htm

Hi Everyone there! We have a very annoying problem since several months when browsing the local network (workgroup) from win xp clients (from win98 clients it's almost OK). The machines in the workgroup appearing very slooow (about 15-20 sec), and this value doesn't change even in the 2nd or 3rd browse. We have 1 linux (debian 2.4.21 pre 3) pc, running the samba (2.2312) server, about 15 win98 clients, 60 win xp clients, 1 win nt server. When I shutdown our win nt server, the problem doesn't change. When I shut...

...f.root-servers.net. 45846 IN A 192.5.5.241 ;; Query time: 281 msec ;; SERVER: 192.168.0.4#53(192.168.0.4) ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 19 16:09:06 2012 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 511 When i change to the samba4 internal dns server, i get response time about ~1-2ms. But why is the bind dlz modul so slooow..? bind version is 9.8.0. What can i doo?? Regards, Tom

...to all recent big intel cores), it won't contend with other cores for the L3 cache. So misses here are where cores start to feel each other's presence. https://reviews.llvm.org/P7943 --event=LLC-load-misses These are misses in last level cache (LLC). I.e. times that we have to go to DRAM (SLOOOW). The getVA codepath show up strongly and we see the memcpy into the output. We may want to consider a nontemporal memcpy to at least avoid polluting the cache. These misses contend on the DRAM bus (although currently it may be underutilized and so adding more parallelism will help to keep it busy,...

Hi everyone, llvm is great! But there is one exception ;) llvm components are generally fast, but instruction selection is slooow. Let me explain. I am developing a toolkit for building virtual machines which can automatically generate a JIT compiler using the interpreter specification. llvm does the hard work of machine code generation. (Thanks to you all) I discovered that JIT compilation is taking much longer than had ho...

...ec > > ;; SERVER: 192.168.0.4#53(192.168.0.4) > > ;; WHEN: Mon Nov 19 16:09:06 2012 > > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 511 > > > > > > When i change to the samba4 internal dns server, i get response time > about ~1-2ms. > > > > But why is the bind dlz modul so slooow..? > you can use kcachegrind to trace bind in foreground mode in order to see > where the time is spent. > > Matthieu. > > -- > Matthieu Patou > Samba Team > http://samba.org > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > i...

...to do? Also, upgrading the remaining samba 4.5.15 DC4 to samba 4.7 causes showrepl to become EXTREMELY slow on that DC. After upgrading to 4.7, showrepl still works on DC5, also ADUC works to both, on DC4 ldapcmp still works quickly, only samba-tool drs showrepl on the upgraded 4.7 DC4 becomes slooow (10, 15 minutes)) A level 10 debug logs tells me that it waits *MANY* minutes after: > kinit for DC4$@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM succeeded and also many minutes after: > GSSAPI credentials for DC4$@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM will expire in 35664 secs In the end it does produce the expected output that replicat...

...to do? Also, upgrading the remaining samba 4.5.15 DC4 to samba 4.7 causes showrepl to become EXTREMELY slow on that DC. After upgrading to 4.7, showrepl still works on DC5, also ADUC works to both, on DC4 ldapcmp still works quickly, only samba-tool drs showrepl on the upgraded 4.7 DC4 becomes slooow (10, 15 minutes)) A level 10 debug logs tells me that it waits *MANY* minutes after: kinit for DC4$@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM succeeded and also many minutes after: GSSAPI credentials for DC4$@SAMBA.DOMAIN.COM will expire in 35664 secs In the end it does produce the expected output that replication is wor...

A while back, I submitted a patch for PR kern/124621, which allows the mounting of an ext2(3) filesystem created with an inode size other than 128. The e2fsprogs' default is now 256, so file systems created on newer Linux distributions or with the port will not be mountable. I was hopeful this would get committed in time for 7.1-RELEASE (and 6.4-RELEASE), however the PR remains open. If

I find myself doing this: Scenario "logged in user visiting the home page" do Given "A logged in user" do a_logged_in_user end When "..." Then "..." end The a_logged_in_user method is a helper method in helper.rb which sets up the state so that the user can browse the website. Later in the story of course, I can just do ''Given

Hello! I have GlusterFS installation with parameters: - 4 servers, connected by 1Gbit/s network (760-800 Mbit/s by iperf) - Distributed-replicated volume with 4 bricks and 2x4 redundancy formula. - Replicated volume with 2 bricks and 2x2 formula. I found some trouble: if I try to copy huge amount of files (94000 files, 3Gb size), this process takes terribly long time (from 20 to 40 minutes). I

for s10u2, documentation recommends 3 to 9 devices in raidz. what is the basis for this recommendation? i assume it is performance and not failure resilience, but i am just guessing... [i know, recommendation was intended for people who know their raid cold, so it needed no further explanation] thanks... oz -- ozan s. yigit | oz at somanetworks.com | 416 977 1414 x 1540 I have a hard time

Hi -- (First time posting to the list...) I''m trying out Rails on my Mac (OS X Panther, 1.6 G5). It seems... kinda slow? I''ve even run it with FastCGI and the response time is still painfully slow. Is this just me? Is mod_ruby any better than FastCGI? Or is it rails? Thanks in advance! -- joshua

Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as