search for: silverwraith

...fault MTA from sendmail to Exim/Qmail/Postfix, or give people the option of installing something instead of Sendmail at install time? -- Avleen Vig "Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys" Systems Admin "Fast, Good, Cheap. Pick any two." www.silverwraith.com "Move BSD. For great justice!"

Does anyone know of a web GUI type application that would allow the creation and deletion of email accounts on an email server?

...ay "deny if established connections is greater than 2". Logging every one of these packets would be fine. Any suggestions? -- Avleen Vig "Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys" Systems Admin "Fast, Good, Cheap. Pick any two." www.silverwraith.com "Move BSD. For great justice!"

I'm using a very old scheme for doing multiple domains using an old Linuxconf based setup. Each domain has it's own passwd/shadow file. It works but I need something new and modern and has a web interface and perhaps a mysql backend or something else good. So - what are people using out there for managing email users and domains? Thanks in advance.

No support help needed, just a success report having Dovecot integrate with Vexim (exim with web based frontend and sql db): http://silverwraith.com/vexim/ Just wanted to forward some configs to the list if anyone finds them useful. I just switched from vexim's normal "virtual_delivery" to "dovecot_virtual_delivery" so I could use sieve, which works nicely with Horde. This is mostly as described on the wiki: ht...

I was just wondering if anyone was using or aware of a program to create MySQL Data Bases for use with Dovecot. For Postfix, there is the 'Postfixadmin' application. I have not seen anything similar for Dovecot and was wondering if one existed. My system consists of all virtual users. -- Gerard Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Can anyone provide more details about the posting below ? >Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm >List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com> >List-Post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com> >List-Help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com> >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com> >List-Subscribe:

This might be more related to an Apache-security list, but as the machine is running FreeBSD, I thought I'd ask here first. In the last two weeks, I've been seeing some very strange errors in my logs a few times daily around the same times. While this happens, load averages go through the roof (I've seen 36+, which is outragous), and the machine becomes very unresponsive. First

Hello Folks, The official email address for this list is `freebsd-security@freebsd.org'. Due to convention, there is an email alias for this list: security@freebsd.org, just as there is for hackers@ & freebsd-hackers@, arch@ & freebsd-arch@, and so on. The security@freebsd.org alias has been the source of occassional problems. Several times in the past, postings have been made to

I made a mistake setting my shell and have set the root users shell to /bin/bash instead of /bin/sh. I am curiuos if anyone knows how to fix this. The machines is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p4 and does not have sudo only su.

I think, there is a neat exploit in the phpbb2.0.8 because I found my home page defaced one dark morning. The patch for phpBB is here. http://www.phpbb.com/downloads.php The excerpt of the log is attached. I believe the link to the described exploit is here. http://secunia.com/advisories/13239 The defacement braggen page is here filter to show the exploited FreeBSD machines that aneurysm.inc

In the next month or two I've got to upgrade a number of servers that are currently on an EOL'd version of 4-STABLE. I foresee that I'll have very limited time to do full OS upgrades on these systems in the coming several years, so I want to make sure I bring them onto an extended-life branch. Right now 4.11 has the furthest projected EOL date (Jan 31 2007), and the projected EOL

This message was sent to bugtraq today: While playing around with FreeBSD 5.4 and jailing I discovered that it was possible to put an ethernet interface into promiscious mode from within the jailed environment, allowing a packetsniffer to gather data not meant for the jailed box. This also affects FreeBSD 5.3 (tested) but not FreeBSD 4.x This can be reproduced on boxes where BPF support is