search for: s_s

...;speaker'). Gender is a between-speaker variable, stress is a within-speaker variable, if that matters. Each dataset has 100 rows from each of 20 speakers, 2000 rows in all. About 5% of the time I get a strange result, where the lmer() model with BOTH fixed factors and the random factor ('gs_s') comes out MUCH worse compared to the models with ONE fixed factor and the random factor ('g_s' and 's_s'), and also compared to the glm() model with both fixed factors and no random factor ('gs'). This doesn't make much sense to me. I've placed a dataset on t...

...See [0, 3]). The problem is the following: Given: %0 = type { i32 } %1 = type { i32 } Creating an intrinsic @llvm.FOO that accepts 'a pointer to %0' cannot be distinguished from the intrinsic accepting 'a pointer to %1': ;For a %0* ptr0, %1* ptr1 call @llvm.FOO.p0s_s %0* %ptr0 call @llvm.FOO.p0s_s %1* %ptr1 ; assertion failure: same name produced, but %ptr1 is not compatible with '%0*' It seems that the name mangling is not coping well with anonymous structs ? See: [1,2]: All anonymous structs get a 's_s' mangling. Still, %0 and %1 are trea...

Hello, Another French student in the rsync mailing list. I have been working on rsync this year for a documentation project for school and I would like to give some comment about rsync block size optimization first, and then to submit a way to make rsync choose by itself the optimal blocksize when updating a large number of files. Well, the first comment: during my work, I wanted to verify