search for: removefnattr

...gt; repository as it's probably the most advanced one. Hi Gael, does it mean vmkit will based on the latest llvm after the merge finished? I run into the same issue Chris meet when trying to verify tilegx backend by compiling vmkit. JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in 'llvm::Function' llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( then I change to vmkit2, but found it's based on 3.2 only, failed compile with latest llvm > > See you, > Gaël > > > > 2013/2/24 Minas Abrahamyan <minas.subs at gmail.com>: >> Hi H...

.../home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler' llvm[3]: Compiling JavaJIT.cpp for Release+Asserts build (bytecode) warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in 'llvm::Function' llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 1 warning and 1 error generated. make[3]: *** [/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler/Release+Asserts/JavaJIT.ll] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler' make[2]: *** [all]...

Hi Minas, Basically, you should not have any difference between the two projects :) (it's not really the case, but we are working on this problem). To explain (sorry for my long email!), I work for a french research institution (Inria) and, as we have an Inria research project around VMKit, I had to create a repository inside my institution (a researcher has always to make his institution

.../j3/Compiler' > llvm[3]: Compiling JavaJIT.cpp for Release+Asserts build (bytecode) > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean > '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] > JavaJIT.cpp:1262:23: error: no member named 'removeFnAttr' in > 'llvm::Function' > llvmFunction->removeFnAttr( > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > 1 warning and 1 error generated. > make[3]: *** > [/home/chris/vmkit/lib/j3/Compiler/Release+Asserts/JavaJIT.ll] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/chris/vmkit/lib...

Hi Harris, A question has arisen, what is the difference between VMKit2 and VMKit, and why, in the first place the new VMKit2 fork was been created? Thanks for answer :) Best regards, Minas On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harris Bakiras <h.bakiras at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > For the moment you can install VMKit following these instructions: > >