search for: redirector

Hello All, I am running a CentOS 4.6 file server for a small office network and I am getting a lot of strange webdav requests from one of the Windows workstations - I have not configured Webdav on the Windows host (hereafter "windows-laptop") in question. Some details - I have configured a Samba share called (say) "share1" on the CentOS server and the windows-laptop connects

...nt* of the asterisks? Codecs, hardware,etc is not important. The thing that Im trying to figure out is how do I present the asterisk servers to a bunch of phones and/or FXStoSIP boxes. a sip proxy is not the solution because the sip proxy will then have to be able to take the load. Do I use a sip redirector? is there any? Google hasn't returned an interesting link. Are there any redirectors available? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama....

Hello, As I mentionned in a previous mail, I cannot connect to Samba 1.9.18p7 using a basic dos redirector and security set to user. I works with share security level or with the full dos redirector which takes 90 k more precious memory ... I got a answer telling me that the dos basic redirector is a piece of ... because it always encrypt the password, even if instructed to use plain text ... The solu...

Hi, I've the following error when I want to create a conditionnal redirector in samba 4 : " server complex operation 'IpValidate' not implemented  " Version : Version 4.6.7-Ubuntu Not using bind9 but Samba 4 DNS internal Must I user bind 9 ? My goal is to create un approbation between AD2016 et samba 4. Regard -- *Hervé* *HÉNOCH* *Responsable inf...

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 1468f8b5a570b76cf202d7890d0b5dab kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm 27073b872577aa31c7229702cd0c118c spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.i386.rpm Source: eb1368fbc81a3d9677ed0f0e9a31e65e spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2010:0460 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2010-0460.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: c268c72e77eb82acd082eed5b1ccf341 kmod-spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm 2d7522f13423c046574e79f47b3fdf2f spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.x86_64.rpm Source: eb1368fbc81a3d9677ed0f0e9a31e65e spice-usb-redirector-4.5-2.el5_5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net

> It turns out that the MS Network Client for DOS Basic Redirector _always_ > sends a 24 byte password. So, I guessed at encryption, got 'libdes', > recompiled my smbd (again), found a 'spare' Silicon Graphics server and > installed Encryption on it. (ENCRYPTION.txt is very good). Yep, good guess. All encrypted passwords in SMB are 24 b...

Gregory Hosler <greg@camelot.eno.ericsson.se> wrote: > Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. > Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In > the event log I see messages like: > > The redirector has times out a request to <server name> > > This did not used to happen. This is very puzzling, and quite annoying, to > have to wait 1 to 2 minutes for a directory or file access (each directory > or file access). Has anyone adressed this yet? In particular, has it been rais...

I am running samba 1.9.18p3 on Solaris 2.5.1 The clients are NT 4.0 sp3 Everything was running smoothly, and then I applied the solaris "y2k" patches. Now, most accesses to samba will hang for a minute or 2, before completing. In the event log I see messages like: The redirector has times out a request to <server name> This did not used to happen. This is very puzzling, and quite annoying, to have to wait 1 to 2 minutes for a directory or file access (each directory or file access). anyone come across this before ? and suggestions ? thanks, and regards, -Greg --...

thubert@nv.blm.gov wrote: > > Since installing 2.0.3 on an AIX platform and using the PDC for > authentication, our BDC logs are filling up with the following error: > > "The redirector received an SMB that was too short" > > Our smb.conf is minimal in nature and we are unsure where to search for > the problems or solution. I have fixed this in the 2.0.4 release by correctly returning a RPC bind-nak packet when the "WINREG" pipe is being opened. For the...

Hi, I am running Samba 2.0.4b under Solaris 2.5.1 on a SPARC20. I have several NT users accessing the system and a few are getting redirect errors. Under the event viewer, NT reports "The redirector received an SMB that was too short." The errors occur upon accessing the file system. It's a new one on me and I'm not sure where to begin troubleshooting. Any ideas? Thanks.

...The system was attempting to transfer file data from buffers to <filename>. The write operation failed, and only some of the data may have been written to the file." Finally, in the NT Event Log, I get the following error: "RDR" "The redirector has timed out a request to <samba_server>." with event ID 3013 *********************************************8 Thanks, Sid V

...; requests to the host and this patch series greatly improves the > performance of such a setup. > > Compared to copying packets via userspace, this improves throughput by > 121% in basic testing. > > Tested as follows. > > Setup: guest unix dgram sender -> guest vsock redirector -> host vsock > server > Threads: 1 > Payload: 64k > No sockmap: > - 76.3 MB/s > - The guest vsock redirector was > "socat VSOCK-CONNECT:2:1234 UNIX-RECV:/path/to/sock" > Using sockmap (this patch): > - 168.8 MB/s (+121%) > - The guest redirector...

Hello Jeremy, > OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is > changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems could be pass from the application layers, (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/down...

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >> >>It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ >>redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, >>per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems >>could be pass from the application layers, > >well,...

On 8/21/23 22:55, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Ralph Boehme wrote: >> On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >>>> OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >>>> changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? >>> >>> It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ >>> redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, >>> per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems >>> could be pass from the applicatio...

...ecify 'DestDir': H:\ >3. click button 'Execute' to start file transferring. > >And wireshark said that read size is 8MB (8388608): >SMB2 171 Read Request Len:8388608 Off:260046848 File: 1GB.img OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ?

I have an old dos app that doesn't run in the win95 shell very well. There are problems with the graphics. Is it possible to connect to a samba server from real dos? I assume the answer is no but I thought I would check. Verne Ball vball@socrates.berkeley.edu

> > > Does the wireshark trace show the Windows client asking for and > getting a RWH lease under SMB2 ? If so, then there's no reason > it can't be caching the entire file locally. Seems strange > behaviour from the Windows redirector here. > I have uploaded the Linux packet capture here (14MB): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwWXJ1NjVwMkJXOEU Also, here is the corresponding Windows packet capture as well (375MB): https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6UHr3GQEkQwbFhOY0lCcEFjZkU > Or alternatively, just use the...

On 8/21/23 11:53, Jones Syue ??? via samba wrote: >> OH - that's *really* interesting ! I wonder how it is >> changing the SMB3+ redirector to do this ? > > It looks like applications could do something and give a hint to SMB3+ > redirector, so far not quite sure how to make it, > per process monitor (procmon) could show that write I/O size seems > could be pass from the application layers, well, sure, the application...