Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "pwduffi".
Did you mean:
pwduffy
2016 Jan 24
1
Just need to vent
> On 24 Jan 2016, at 17:45, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 20:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500
>> Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>
>>> The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because I
>>> don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3.
>>
>>
2016 Jan 25
6
Just need to vent
Once upon a time, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> said:
> The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself,
> but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a
> window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted
> to use it, or stick with the old init framework, I'd have opted for the
> latter (as I was
2016 Jan 24
4
Just need to vent
On Sun, January 24, 2016 10:45 am, Peter Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 20:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500
>> Mark LaPierre wrote:
>>
>> > The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because
>> I
>> > don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3.
>>
>> Install Mate on Centos 7 and
2016 Jan 26
1
Just need to vent
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 08:05 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> said:
> > The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself,
> > but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a
> > window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted
> > to use it, or stick
2016 Jan 25
2
Just need to vent
On Jan 24, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> wrote:
> The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself,
> but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a
> window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted
> to use it, or stick with the old init framework, I'd have opted for the
> latter
2016 Jan 26
0
Just need to vent
On 01/26/2016 05:51 AM, Peter Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 08:05 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> said:
>>> The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself,
>>> but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a
>>> window had appeared telling me about
2016 Jan 24
5
Just need to vent
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500
Mark LaPierre wrote:
> The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because I
> don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3.
Install Mate on Centos 7 and you never have to touch Gnome 3. I did, and my desktops don't look or work any different today than they did under Centos 6.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~
2015 Aug 31
0
Hello everybody
On what topic specifically do you need advice?
On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 11:24 +0800, Martin Zhou wrote:
> * Hi, I am Martin, coming from the east of china, is a novice for
> Linux. Kindly give me your advice. Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2016 Jan 24
0
Just need to vent
On Sat, 2016-01-23 at 20:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:05:02 -0500
> Mark LaPierre wrote:
>
> > The main reason I'm still using, nearly obsolete, CentOS 6 is because I
> > don't want to have to deal with Gnome 3.
>
> Install Mate on Centos 7 and you never have to touch Gnome 3. I did,
> and my desktops don't look or work any
2016 Jan 24
0
Just need to vent
On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 12:01 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Well, there is Linux distribution which is systemd-free. And that
> distribution I predict will live for decently long time. It is "Devuan" -
> a fork of Debian, stripped off systemd and friends... well, I should have
> said: composed without systemd and friends. Devuan was forked off ebian
> because of systemd.
2016 Jan 26
0
Just need to vent
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 11:57 +0000, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Debate/initsystem/systemd#Why_Debian_should_default_to_systemd
>
Might be more convincing if they stuck to reasoned argument, rather than
propaganda. "Systemd is straightforward"; "systemd is incredibly fast (1
second to boot)" - reminds me
2016 Jan 26
2
Just need to vent
On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 16:53 +0000, Richard Mann wrote:
> >
> > Complaining on the CentOS list is probably not that productive, though.
> >
>
> +1. To be constructive, the criticism would need to be done ELSEWHERE. On this list, it is just whining.
It's not complaining. It's discussion.