search for: propsal

I have prepared a rough draft of my GSoC proposal, I'd request the mentors to look into it, and guide me upon the same. Google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/158TI2EaUrqVsD__-mXdKUIlVM9_9cGlnc5w7NwX8ahs/edit?usp=sharing Regards. Aditya Kumar.

...be notified by email and can pick up their free CD and handset at the Ipsando booth. For a beta version of the phone and a list of features, please see: http://www.astricon.net/phone/ipbeta.php _Any More Speaking Proposals?_ If you would like to speak at AstriCon 2005 and have not yet sent in a propsal, please do so ASAP. We need your proposal, biography, and a head-shot photo (see the instructions on the AstriCon 2005 site: Speak At AstriCon). We will begin making final selections this week. _Any Questions?_ If you have any questions about AstriCon 2005, please let us know. Email info@astr...

I have a vector of logLik values that I'd like to return and it would be nice if the the print method didn't run them together. Could I make a plea for using sep = " ", rather than sep = "" in print.logLik? url: www.econ.uiuc.edu/~roger Roger Koenker email rkoenker at uiuc.edu Department of Economics vox: 217-333-4558

Another suggestion: a web service that would allow you to submit a test build and it would provide you feedback on deviations from known good for that target. I know a lot of people keep two trees around for this purpose, and I'd personally like to ditch the duplicate if I could. -- Chris On Mar 21, 2008, at 9:22 PM, Rajika Kumarasiri wrote: > Hello every body, > Thank you all

Hello every body, Thank you all for your great suggestions and feedbacks, I'd forward the detailed proposal within couple of days. And also if I need to clarify any thing I'll ask in the list. Thanks again. Regards, Rajika On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > While on the subject of the testsuite, some random thoughts: > > - show

Hi all: following the previous discussion, it looks like plot(x) with y=NULL still does not work correctly. If one tries for example plot(1:5) it works, but already for plot(runif(100)) it does not. I posted the proposed correction for plot.POSIXct and plot.POSIXlt before. Please voice your opinions whether the following fix for plot.default could be reasonable? I include the full function and

I have found the "simulate" method (incorporated in some packages) very handy. As far as I can tell the only class for which simulate is actually implemented in base R is lm ... this is actually a little dangerous for a naive user who might be tempted to try simulate(X) where X is a glm fit instead, because it defaults to simulate.lm (since glm inherits from the lm class), and the

...if (! (bitwdith == 16 && signed && data_format == OGG_PCM_PCM) || ! (bitwdith == 32 && data_format == OGG_PCM_FLOAT)) ooops_we_dont_handle_this ("some error message"); > in fact, many will require a very small set of parameters going in, My propsal has a small number of parameters; one. I don't thinks its practical to have zero parameters. How this: switch (format) { case OGG_PCM_S8 : case OGG_PCM_FLOAT32 : case OGG_PCM_FLOAT64 : /* ALl Ok. */ break ; defa...

Hi all, Siliva contacted me about this OggPCM proposal and asked me to join in. For those who don't know me, I am the main author and maintainer of libsndfile and therefore know quite a bit about how uncompressed audio is stored in sound files. However even I would not consider myself an expert; there are areas to do with channel assignments that I know I am ignorant of. I am also quite