search for: posix_fcntl_getlock

...ange(173) posix_lock_in_range: offset_out = 330004, count_out = 24 [2008/11/19 11:32:28, 8] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_getlock(235) posix_fcntl_getlock 28 330004 24 0 [2008/11/19 11:32:28, 8] lib/util.c:fcntl_ge...

...onitoring the activity in top shows that during these 30 seconds the smbd process for the client is consuming all processing power it can get (on one core). Having set "loglevel = 2 locking:10" the log gets filled up with entries like these: [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 8] locking/posix.c:234(posix_fcntl_getlock) posix_fcntl_getlock 105 4729736 242 0 [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 8] lib/util.c:1832(fcntl_getlock) fcntl_getlock fd=105 offset=4729736 count=242 type=0 [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 3] lib/util.c:1856(fcntl_getlock) fcntl_getlock: fd 105 is returned info 2 pid 0 [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 8] locking/posix....

...he HP-UX-based files, I see the following in my messages file: Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray kernel: rpcbind: server xavier not responding, timed out Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray kernel: lockd: couldn't create RPC handle for xavier Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray smbd[5259]: [2007/08/03 15:14:49, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_getlock(242) Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray smbd[5259]: posix_fcntl_getlock: WARNING: lock request at offset 0, length 16384 returned Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray smbd[5259]: [2007/08/03 15:14:49, 0] locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_getlock(243) Aug 3 15:14:49 leoray smbd[5259]: an No locks available error. This can...

Dear all, I have set up a two node workin gluster with glusterfs3.1 and Samba-Sernet 3.5. Everything is working great except MSOffice files (Word/Excell). On the gluster-vol they have the strange behavior That they rest read only, write protected. Every other type of files can be manged without problem, openoffice files too. So when I save a word file on the vol and try to change it it is write

Hi, I've noticed that over a WAN (T1) I'm getting incredibly slow file copy performance. Using smbclient on a linux machine on one size of the WAN, As you can imagine, this makes all of our file shares unusable over the WAN. It's not an issue with WAN performance, because using scp to transfer the same file, I get speeds of ~145k/s. A tcpdump of the file copy of ~2MB file that actually