search for: posh

...Xserve to an Intel Xserve. I used "rsync" to bring everyone's home directories over, and in the back of my mind wondered about how it would handle the binary index files... only one way to find out! :) Once I tried to login to IMAP, I got the following results: May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): Rebuilding index file /Users/cabel/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index: CPU architecture changed May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): fscking index file / Users/cabel/mail/.imap/INBOX/dovecot.index May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): Fixed index...

...y compiled. I opened it afterwards and it contains some error message that seem to not belong there. I do have gcc (4.0.1) and make etc. installed. The Powerbook is obviously not an intel mac but in the .bundle-file i found this, i am not sure if that helps to find out what the problem is: *ERROR: POSH double precision floating point serialization failed. Please report this to poshlib at poshlib.org! OS:..............MacOS X CPU:.............Intel 386+ endian:..........little ptr size:........32-bits 64-bit ints......yes floating point...enabled compiler.........Gnu GCC Please help! Patrick...

Hi Everyone, I''m using Ferret 0.10.11 with acts_as_ferret from SVN (same results with 0.10.10 and 0.10.9 though). I''m running into an odd problem where the scores of my top-ranking search results are ridiculously small - even when the query is one that should match at least one document with a decent score. To give an example, I have just the names of 5 businesses indexed

Hi, We are try to use the "database_manager =>CGI::Session::MemoryStore" for the session management. our website has a lot of "redirect_to". while the website is running under webrick, everything is fine. But when we run the system under aprache/fcgi. the redirect_to seems doesn''t work anymore with the option "MemoryStore" does anyone have the same

Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:38 AM, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > > > This is the SVr4 Bourne Shell, so you need to take into account what has been > > added with Svr4: > > Is there any difference between your osh and the Heirloom Bourne Shell? > >

Hi folks, I have British comedienne, Alison Keenan (another Alison!) coming in on Saturday afternoon to record the Asterisk prompts for me. Alison speaks with a "posh boarding school" accent. Finally we'll have a free British English female voice bank. As I have her in my studio (yeah right; it's a cupboard under the stairs) does anyone need anything doing? She's charging a Pound a word with a minimum of 20 quid. Interested parties should drop...

...ng gem ... (Gem::Installer::ExtensionBuildError) ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. ruby extconf.rb install ferret creating Makefile make cc -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I. -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fPIC -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c posh.c cc -I. -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux -I. -fPIC -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -fPIC -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c q_phrase.c q_phrase.c:1:20: error: string.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.3/include/syslimits.h:7,...

...hen bsh is several years late to fill a gap already filled by ash, in the same way that the prior existence of bash makes the open-source version of ksh93 uninteresting to most people. This is why you need a web page to sell your project: to explain why someone should abandon bash, zsh, ash, dash, posh, ksh93u+, mksh? 4. CDDL annoys a lot of people. Yes, I know, GPL annoys a lot of people, too. But again, you?re going up against ash, which is BSD, which annoys almost no one. :)

...39;t need to do > >> much, other than to watch that it stays healthy. > > RPvs> Also know as 'sit and let it bit-rot' ;-) > > MMMM. Bit-rot! Delicious! [Or does it get *better* with age, like > Whiskey?] Surely you mean 'whisky', everything else is just posh moonshine. LOL No software only get better if it is maintained. > > >> So, how do you all handle the Debian, IIRC, two year cycle? Do > >> Debian upgrades go off pretty smoothly, so you have a 99% chance > >> of moving from, say, jessie to stretch without any hassle...

Suddenly, today, my wife's Windows 95 machine can't print to the network printer on my Linux machine. It complains that "there was an error printing to \\posh\lp ... There was a problem printing to the port." The error 1st occurred (coincidentally?) after I had upgraded the kernel from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19. But rebooting to 2.4.18 has made no difference. We're running smbd 2.2.1a. /var/log/samba/coo.log contains a lot of messages like this: [2...

> > Yeah you're right. The main thing to do I think is set expectations > appropriately. e.g. for a so-and-so spec'ed machine, you can expect > x authentications per/second and y IO operations per second > simultaneously. > > Problem is, I have no idea what x and y are :-). > > -- Yes ,Jeremy, io is the thing people should think about most and forget about.

.../ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I. -fno-common -g -O2 -fno-common -pipe -fno-common -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c multimapper.c gcc -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I. -fno-common -g -O2 -fno-common -pipe -fno-common -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c posh.c gcc -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I. -fno-common -g -O2 -fno-common -pipe -fno-common -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -c priorityqueue.c gcc -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-darwin8.10.3 -I. -fn...

>> A substantial reason I'm not using debian/devuan is LTS support. RPvs> Debian has its own version of LTS: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS Yeah, I've seen that. Not a lot of faith in it though. It sounds a lot like "trust me, someone's going to do it." [I know, cheap, quick, well done - and I want all three. Sigh.] If they'd been doing it the last five years and

...-I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -c hash.c gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-common -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -c fs_store.c gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-common -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -c posh.c gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-common -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -c except.c gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-common -I. -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i686-linux -I. -c ram_store.c gcc -fPIC -g -O2 -fno-common -I. -I/usr...

...ost without maintainance at least manual. > > > > RPvs> Also know as 'sit and let it bit-rot' ;-) > > > > MMMM. Bit-rot! Delicious! [Or does it get *better* with age, like > > Whiskey?] > > Surely you mean 'whisky', everything else is just posh moonshine. LOL > > No software only get better if it is maintained. > > > > > >> So, how do you all handle the Debian, IIRC, two year cycle? Do > > >> Debian upgrades go off pretty smoothly, so you have a 99% chance > > >> of moving from, say, j...

...s several years late to fill a gap already filled by ash, in the same way that the prior existence of bash makes the open-source version of ksh93 uninteresting to most people. > > This is why you need a web page to sell your project: to explain why someone should abandon bash, zsh, ash, dash, posh, ksh93u+, mksh? I am not interested in working against ksh93, as this is much closer to POSIX than the current Bourne Shell. The Bourne Shell however is a nice idea for the system shell in /bin/sh because it is faster than bash and as fast as ksh93 but much smaller (if you use the UNIX linker,...

Hi there Our company is using the Linksys SPA-942 Phones, and they are pretty useless. They dont have any central management or provisioning, as well as a pretty bad interface. Can anyone reccomend any voip phones( Cisco, Polycom, SNOM ) that have * Central Management for all the phones (We dont mind if we have to buy the software to manage them) * Programable shortcut buttons, So i can

Paul wrote: > No seriously, I don't have the time to spend going out and monitoring a > dozen forums. I find mail lists much more convenient ... the > information comes to me, I don't have to go to the information. I feel the same. I'd like to know exactly what it is that people find so convenient about forums. I'd also like to know why the wine list archives can't

Hi, I have this setup block: setup do session[:login] = ''jhughes'' @user = mock("user") User.stub!(:find).and_return(@user) @params = {:cn => "Bilbo Baggins", :telephoneNumber => "416-277-4418", :mail => "bilbo at baggins.com"} end And then this spec: specify "should update and save the

...dh_pycentral, please use dh_python2 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 676036 + jessie Bug #676036 [src:sugar-log-activity-0.86] sugar-log-activity-0.86: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: python-sugar-0.86, python-sugar-toolkit-0.86 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 701443 + jessie Bug #701443 [src:posh] posh: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 643110 + jessie Bug #643110 [src:extplorer] extplorer: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b extplorer-2.1.0b6+dfsg.3 gave error exit status 2 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 643192 + jessie Bug #643192 [src:libnet-ping-external-...