search for: pathinfo

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "pathinfo".

Did you mean: path_info
2011 Jun 09
0
Samba on RHEL 6: Permission denied when mounting FUSE partition
...odsInvoker:370 - Entering getattr_pre with path '/' 2011-06-02 16:38:11,980 DEBUG FuseMethodsInvoker:349 - Root, so we have to display all subfolders. 2011-06-02 16:38:11,980 DEBUG FuseMethodsInvoker:393 - GetPath User is '/' 2011-06-02 16:38:11,980 DEBUG FuseMethodsInvoker:401 - PathInfo for root is '0' 2011-06-02 16:38:11,980 DEBUG GetPathInfo:51 - Entering root and returning immediately with conf users: 3 2011-06-02 16:38:11,981 DEBUG GetPathInfo:75 - Mode is 16877 2011-06-02 16:38:11,981 DEBUG FuseMethodsInvoker:412 - PathInfos is Ok 2011-06-02 16:38:11,981 DEBUG Fu...
2012 Mar 31
1
File Inventory on Bricks
...inside gluster which gives you the information which file resides on which brick in a distributed setup ? > Assume i want to find all files residing on rd24. > > The only method i can think of is logging into that raid and find all files locally. > try 'gefattr -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo $file' on the gluster mountpoint Regards, Amar > Volume Name: data > Type: Distribute > Status: Started > Number of Bricks: 5 > Transport-type: tcp > Bricks: > Brick1: rd29:/data > Brick2: rd34:/data > Brick3: rd25:/data > Brick4: rd28:/data > Brick5: rd24:/da...
2024 Jan 25
1
Upgrade 10.4 -> 11.1 making problems
Good morning, hope i got it right... using: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/de-de/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.1/html/administration_guide/ch27s02 mount -t glusterfs -o aux-gfid-mount glusterpub1:/workdata /mnt/workdata gfid 1: getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e text /mnt/workdata/.gfid/faf59566-10f5-4ddd-8b0c-a87bc6a334fb getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/workdata/.gfid/faf59566-10f5-4ddd-8b0c-a87bc6a334fb trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo="(<DISTRIBUTE:workdata-dht> (<REPLICATE:workdata-replicate-3>...
2024 Jan 27
1
Upgrade 10.4 -> 11.1 making problems
...googlemail.com> ??????: Good morning, hope i got it right... using: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/de-de/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.1/html/administration_guide/ch27s02 mount -t glusterfs -o aux-gfid-mount glusterpub1:/workdata /mnt/workdata gfid 1: getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e text /mnt/workdata/.gfid/faf59566-10f5-4ddd-8b0c-a87bc6a334fb getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: mnt/workdata/.gfid/faf59566-10f5-4ddd-8b0c-a87bc6a334fb trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo="(<DISTRIBUTE:workdata-dht> (<REPLICATE:workdata-replicate-3>...
2018 Apr 18
0
Bitrot - Restoring bad file
...scribed in the link above) it is possible to find the correct brick. But the command is possibly expensive and I get the feeling that "getfattr" is the recommended way. > > Any thoughts? Another getfattr can give brick details where that file is residing ??? getfattr -n glusterfs.pathinfo <path of file> where path can be <mount>/.gfid/<gfid> or absolute path of file. > > Thanks! > Omar > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/glust...
2018 Apr 17
2
Bitrot - Restoring bad file
Hi, I have a question regarding bitrot detection. Following the RedHat manual (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3.3/html/administration_guide/bitrot-restore_corrupt_file) I am trying out bad-file-restoration after bitrot. "gluster volume bitrot VOLNAME status" gets me the GFIDs that are corrupt and on which Host this happens. As far as I can tell
2017 Oct 19
2
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...rfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5- ff2a51c10421security.selinux=0x73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563745f723a756e 6c6162656c65645f743a733000trusted.bit- rot.version=0x020000000000000059b1b316000270e7trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5a f7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5- ff2a51c10421.glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute I had to totally rebuild the dead RAID array and did a copy from the live one before activating gluster on the rebuilt system. I acc...
2017 Oct 23
2
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...b5-ff2a51c10421 security.selinux=0x73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563745f723a756e6c6162656c65645f743a733000 trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000059b1b316000270e7 trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 [root at bmidata1<mailto:root at bmidata1> brick]# getfattr -d -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute I had to totally rebuild the dead RAID array and did a copy from the live one before activating gluster on the rebuilt system. I ac...
2024 Jan 24
1
Upgrade 10.4 -> 11.1 making problems
Hi, Can you find and check the files with gfids: 60465723-5dc0-4ebe-aced-9f2c12e52642faf59566-10f5-4ddd-8b0c-a87bc6a334fb Use 'getfattr -d -e hex -m. ' command from https://docs.gluster.org/en/main/Troubleshooting/resolving-splitbrain/#analysis-of-the-output . Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 9:44, Hu Bert<revirii at googlemail.com> wrote: Good morning,
2020 Jul 08
1
Dovecot - Xoauth2 - keycloak
...6IkxvdXZlYXV4IiwiZW1haWwiOiJrZW5ueUBudWJvLnNpdGUifQ.TsUBiZ5nSTuA9ojr6bao5NQUHeNRmcYQZsC95rrhYca9FsFG4xG8mT53X9eOSNEqzRMJiPHaDuAh-3Bq8Rjdlg HTTP/1.1" 404 1465 "-" "dovecot-oauth2-passdb/2.3.4.1" DEBUG [org.jboss.resteasy.resteasy_jaxrs.i18n] (default task-2) RESTEASY002315: PathInfo: /realms/test_saml/protocol/openid-connect/tokeneyJhbGciOiJFUzI1N iIsInR5cCIgOiAiSldUIiwia2lkIiA6ICJEZzR2aWtndzN2MWVpQVgxMU10YkFIaXRaUnM2R2RlVzN3b3hGTTBpd1NnIn0.eyJleHAiOjE1OTQyNDQ3MDQsImlhdCI6MTU5NDI0NDUyNCwiYXV0aF90aW1lIjoxNTk0MjQ0MzQ3LCJqdGk iOiIyYTg3MjQ3NS0zMGMxLTRmMDctODg5Ny04YmQ4OTJjMGI1MjEiL...
2017 Oct 23
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...4b5-ff2a51c10421 > security.selinux=0x73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563 > 745f723a756e6c6162656c65645f743a733000 > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000059b1b316000270e7 > trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 > > [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex > -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute > > I had to totally rebuild the dead RAID array and did a copy from the live > one before activating gluste...
2017 Oct 23
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...000 > > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000059b1b316000270e7 > > > > > > trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > > > > > > > [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e > > hex -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: > > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute > > > > > > > > > > > > I had to total...
2017 Oct 24
3
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...; security.selinux=0x73797374656d5f753a6f626a6563 > 745f723a756e6c6162656c65645f743a733000 > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000059b1b316000270e7 > > trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 > > > > [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex > -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute > > > > I had to totally rebuild the dead RAID array and did a copy from the live > one before ac...
2017 Oct 24
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...> > > > > > > > > trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n > > > > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex -m . > > > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > > > > > > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: > > > > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute > > > > > >...
2017 Nov 06
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
...> > > > > > > > > trusted.gfid=0x0000a5ef5af7401b84b5ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [root at bmidata1 brick]# getfattr -d -n > > > > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo -e hex -m . > > > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421 > > > > > > > > > > > > .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421: > > > > trusted.glusterfs.pathinfo: No such attribute > > > > > >...
2017 Oct 17
0
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Attached is the heal log for the volume as well as the shd log. >> Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. [root at tpc-cent-glus1-081017 ~]# getfattr -d -e hex -m . /exp/b1/gv0/.glusterfs/10/86/108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:
2019 Dec 28
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
...? >> storage.batch-fsync-delay-usec ? ? ? ? ?0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.owner-uid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.owner-gid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.node-uuid-pathinfo ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.health-check-interval ? ? ? ? ? 30 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.build-pgfid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> storage.gfid2path ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ?...
2017 Oct 17
3
gfid entries in volume heal info that do not heal
Hi Matt, Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. On the bricks of first replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/10/86/ 108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 On the fourth replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/ e0/c5/e0c56bf7-8bfe-46ca-bde1-e46b92d33df3 Also run the "gluster volume
2019 Dec 27
0
GFS performance under heavy traffic
...? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.batch-fsync-delay-usec ? ? ? ? ?0 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.owner-uid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.owner-gid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.node-uuid-pathinfo ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.health-check-interval ? ? ? ? ? 30 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.build-pgfid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > storage.gfid2path ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?...
2019 Dec 24
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
Hi David, On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node? It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards