search for: oseed

Is there any need for CentOS to build and distribute the OSE version of VirtualBox? The differences between the versions are here: http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions The reason I ask is that the Full version is free for personal use and the restrictions (especially no USB or RDP) make the OSE version fairly crippled, so I am not sure there is enough benefit to design and keep updated

...andom.seed. For instance, a common mistake (me too) is to reset to .GlobalEnv$.Random.seed <- NULL in a fresh R session but this will produce a warning on: ".Random.seed' is not an integer vector but of type 'NULL', so ignored". You end up having to do things such as: oseed <- .GlobalEnv$.Random.seed on.exit({ if (is.null(oseed)) { rm(list=".Random.seed", envir= .GlobalEnv) } else { assign(".Random.seed", value=oseed, envir= .GlobalEnv) } }) to avoid that warning. So, having support functions for this in base R woul...

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 20:01:53 +0800 Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > On 08/29/2017 05:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:30:33PM +0200, Tom?? Golembiovsk? wrote: > >> Hi, > > I have CCed the relevant mailing lists and people most recently involved > > in virtio-balloon discussions. Hopefully this will help get the right

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 20:01:53 +0800 Wei Wang <wei.w.wang at intel.com> wrote: > On 08/29/2017 05:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 11:30:33PM +0200, Tom?? Golembiovsk? wrote: > >> Hi, > > I have CCed the relevant mailing lists and people most recently involved > > in virtio-balloon discussions. Hopefully this will help get the right

I have some RPMs I've made of innotek's VirtualBox OSE (Open Source Edition) for both CentOS 4 and CentOS 5 (i386). These RPMs include the dkms support for the kernel driver, etc. I have a couple of subtle things to fix in the RPMs (like setting the permissions on udev devices, etc.) but they're already usable. Before I spend more time on it, and submit it for inclusion in the

Full_Name: Danny van Dyk Version: R-2.2.0 OS: Gentoo/AMD64 Submission from: (NULL) (83.129.50.65) I have successfully compiled R-2.2.0 using ifc-9.0.026 on my x86_64 box. The only (minor) change that hade to be made was adding fpicflags="-fPIC" to configure.ac in case F77 matches either "ifc" (old name) or "ifort" (new name). Please apply following patch: dvandyk

Forgot to say: For, oseed <- base::getRandomSeed() on.exit(base::setRandomSeed(oseed)) one could upgrade set.seed() to take this role, e.g. oseed <- set.seed(0xBEEF) on.exit(set.seed(oseed)) Current, set.seed() always return NULL. BTW, and my memory might be bad, I think I mentioned this in the past but was...

I am having issues with guest OSes running on SLES10 (Sun 4200) hosts. Periodically, the guest OS system drops off the network. From the general network it is not pingable, consequently, ssh fails. If however, I log into the SLES10 server that is hosting the guest OS and ssh to the guest OS, then it becomes immediately pingable and accessible to the rest of the network. Almost like the

> On 27.12.2015 23:57, Jernej Simon?i? via Syslinux wrote: > > On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > >> How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / > >> loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer > >> version of Syslinux (containing this proposed change in its keytab-lilo

I haven't followed Wine in quite a while, other than to do an occasional update (but hopefully this will change). I noticed DOSBox support was added in January 2011. My understanding is that when Wine can't even attempt to run DOS programs itself (MAC OSX, 64bit OSes, etc) that it will attempt to run using DOSBox. Is this correct? Is the plan to replace native Wine DOS support across the

-- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -------------- next part -------------- >From 01623099b24d3ec28c8123407180f9d42755386c Mon Sep 17

According to http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html, "Shared libraries are not supported on Windows and not recommended in the other OSes". The problem is that static libraries have some limitations, especially when linked into multiple shared libraries, the global data of llvm could have multiple copies leading to undefined behaviors. This has caused much pains during my usage of llvm. My

Hi, I am taking my first steps towards virtualization. I have 3 Gateway Servers; all on CentOS 5.3 (non-graphical mode) + Squid. We have 3 separate teams each of 5-7 users who use 1 ISP each via their own Gateway server. I am keen to use virtualization and consolidate all 3 servers on a single server. I plan to install ZEN on a Pentium Core2Duo with 2GB RAM & 1 nic. Then create 3 virtual

I was just wondering if anyone here knows why the OO.org packages on RHEL/Centos are so huge. Eg. On Mandriva 2006: 40834529 OpenOffice.org 113064600 OpenOffice.org-libs 20124669 OpenOffice.org-help-en 19976941 OpenOffice.org-l10n-en = ~185MB On Centos 4: 683298379 openoffice.org-i18n 124072694 openoffice.org 111894560 openoffice.org-libs = ~876MB!! When I say 'installed by default' I

My friend uses a typical dual-boot setup (Windows XP and Centos 5.3). The machine is online 24/7 and he often uses it from a remote location (Linux via ssh -X, Windows via rdesktop). The problem is that he wants to be able to remotely configure which of these two OSes is to be the default on next reboot, so he can switch from one OS to the other and back remotely. If Linux is up, he just needs to

On Sunday, December 27, 2015, 23:34:11, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > How this change would affect users with older versions of kbd / > loadkeys / or in older OSes? I mean, let's assume a user using a newer > version of Syslinux (containing this proposed change in its keytab-lilo > perl script) but with an older OS / older version of kbd / loadkeys / > map files. The changed

Hello all, Pardon me if this has already been covered elsewhere, however I have not been able to find such documentation. Is there a consolidated set of documentation that clearly explains what's necessary to port LLVM to other OSes & how to add support for building executables (& libraries) for those OSes? I'm searching through the source in an attempt to understand what needs to

Hi All, I recently started exploring the Xen and was successfull in installing and running Xen along with ttylinux (test guest OS) on it. I had few questions regarding the same and I would appreciate if somebody could help me understand these. 1. The documentation describes inter-domain communication. My understanding is that Xen maintain two domains: dom0 for the control domain and dom1 for the

Bumping this up to the front again ... because it exhibits a difference in behaviour of R across OSs. Such a 'feature' may not be desirable. On 4 April 2016 at 18:00, Arunkumar Srinivasan wrote: | Hello, | | Following Dirk's post here: https://github.com/Rdatatable/data.table/issues/1619 | we would like to clarify if this is the right behaviour, and if so, | the rationale behind it.

Hi, My name is Jose and I work at Google on the Ganeti project. I am using Xen 4.0. I would like to ask your advice on what you think is the best way to send data between the guest and the host, for example, the guest OS tells Ganeti that it wants to be reinstalled at reboot time. Even a simple integer suffices for our purposes. We have considered adding a new device, such as, a char/block