search for: openstruct

Hi just wondering if there is a easy way to turn an xml entity into a object like of type OpenStruct where i can access everything like a property? It''s kind of like parsing xml, I already know about nokogiri, but I want to work is a OpenStruct and not a DOM object, does that make sense? =P -- Kind Regards, Rajinder Yadav | DevMentor.org | Do Good! ~ Share Freely GNU/Linux: 2.6.35-2...

...to_s and m.respond_to?:layout;s;end And, well, as for ActiveSupport, Camping only uses the supra- flexi-careless-hash, so we need a replacement. I''m not too hot on [symbol] and [string] equivalence. But I do like to call the query string vars like methods. What do you think about using OpenStruct instead? I''ve been testing with this: class H < OpenStruct def u h;for k,v in h;@table[k.to_sym]=v;new_ostruct_member(k);end def self.[] *a;new *a;end en Or, you know, just Hash is okay, right folks? _why

.../config/rdig_config.rb 1. RDig.configuration do |cfg| 2. cfg.crawler.start_urls = [ ''http://localhost:3000/login/index'' ] 3. cfg.index.path = "C:/rails/managedsupport/index/development/rdig-index" 4. cfg.verbose = true 5. cfg.content_extraction = OpenStruct.new( 6. :hpricot => OpenStruct.new( 7. :title_tag_selector => ''title'', 8. :content_tag_selector => ''body'' 9. ) 10. ) 11. 12. end I have created the index file using the code 1. rdig -c config/rdig_config.r...

...;/home/myaccount/index'' ################################################################## # options you might want to set, the given values are the defaults # set to true to get stack traces on errors cfg.verbose = true # content extraction options cfg.content_extraction = OpenStruct.new( # HPRICOT configuration # this is the html parser used by default from RDig 0.3.3 upwards. # Hpricot by far outperforms Rubyful Soup, and is at least as flexible when # it comes to selection of portions of the html documents. :hpricot => OpenStruct.new( # css selecto...

...o nothing in them. Both rdig_config.rb files look like: cfg.crawler.start_urls = [ ''http://domain.tpl/'' ] cfg.crawler.include_hosts = [ ''domain.tpl/'' ] cfg.index.path = ''./rdig_index'' cfg.verbose = true cfg.content_extraction = OpenStruct.new( :hpricot => OpenStruct.new( :title_tag_selector => ''title'', :content_tag_selector => ''body'' ) Both enviroment.rb files have: require ''acts_as_ferret'' require ''rdig'' require ''rdi...

Hi everybody, I just started thinking about a project and am seeking some help regarding its design. The idea would be to create labels (i.e. address labels).I could let users type the text manually, but I dont think they would appreciate that when they''ll want to print 5000 addresses. I can also probably let them import csv files, that should not be a problem, but playing with those

I''ve inherited an EAV database and there''s really no option to remodel it. Data is stored as key_name, key_value pairs Trying to return a meaningful, unified recordset is far too complex to be efficient. I''ve decided to make use of the MySQL GROUP_CONCAT, and CONCAT_WS functions to return a fast query result, with the consolidated fields as one string. The final data is

I love OpenStruct, but it has no ability to iterate over the members. I had extended it, but recently I use this little class. Anyone see any issues with it ? class OpenHash < Hash def method_missing(name, value=nil) key = name.to_s.sub(/[=?!]$/,'''').to_sym self[key] = value if name.t...

class Mash < Hash def method_missing(name, value=nil) key = name.to_s.sub(/[=?!]$/,'''').to_sym self[key] = value if name.to_s[-1,1] == "=" self[key] = Mash.new unless self[key] || value return self[key] end end Its like OpenStruct...so what can you do? require ''pp'' m = Mash.new m.first_name = "john" m.last_name = "doe" m.address.street = "somewhere drive" m.address.city = "somecity" m.address.state = "somestate" m.address.zip = 12334 pp m {:address=>...

is there any equivalent to this class A attr_accessor :foo, :bar def initialize(options={}) options.each{|k,v| send("#{k}=", v)} end end I know that OpenStruct is very similar, but you don''t get to define specific attributes. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to th...

I''m starting a new project and I want to try writing the client first. I.e. I want to write my ''views'' first and I would like to mock out all the models in such a way that I can run the site and browse it with the mocked out models. Is it easy to use rspec''s mocking for this sort of thing and has anyone done it before? Does anyone know of a tutorial out there

...f.size raise "short write at offset #{off} (wanted #{buf.size}, done #{siz})" end off += buf.size end end end module Ls include BaseOp @readonly = 1 def perform gu, opts puts gu.list_devices end end end def main opts = OpenStruct.new offset: 0, bs: 1<<20 optp = OptionParser.new optp.banner << " [op] [diskimage] op = [#{OPS.names.join ?|}] options:" optp.on("-d", "--guestdevice DEV", "guest device") { |c| opts.dev = c } optp.on("--blocksize BS", Int...

What''s the recommended way to catch errors like this: NoMethodError in Register#confirm Showing app/views/register/confirm.rhtml where line #4 raised: undefined method `namen'' for nil:NilClass I get this error when someone does somethinh like: http://.........../register/confirm?email=jkdsfadslkjflksd If I make: remail = params[:email] @user = Request.find(:first,

Hi all, I would like to discuss a design idea I have in mind with you, in order to get critical feedback. ActiveRecord supports single table inheritance(STI) "per se", BUT you must add all possible instance variables(properties) of all subclasses to the "base table"(as columns). I would like to circumvent this restriction. Say we have a class AbstractGenericThing <

...t; end > off += buf.size > end > end > end > > module Ls > include BaseOp > > @readonly = 1 > > def perform gu, opts > puts gu.list_devices > end > end > > end > > def main > opts = OpenStruct.new offset: 0, bs: 1<<20 > optp = OptionParser.new > optp.banner << " [op] [diskimage] > > op = [#{OPS.names.join ?|}] > > options:" > > optp.on("-d", "--guestdevice DEV", "guest device") { |c| opts.dev = c } &...

...quot;ls" => %w[4 2] p c.li p c.ls ~ > ruby sample/p.rb [4, 2] ["4", "2"] <========< sample/q.rb >========> ~ > cat sample/q.rb require ''traits'' # # the OpenTraits class is similar to an OpenStruct but, imho, easier to use. # the otraits shorthand can be used to contruct one # # # options passed as args dynamically create and init traits # config = otraits :port => 42 p config.port # # any passed block does the same but, via a method miss...

...quot;ls" => %w[4 2] p c.li p c.ls ~ > ruby sample/p.rb [4, 2] ["4", "2"] <========< sample/q.rb >========> ~ > cat sample/q.rb require ''traits'' # # the OpenTraits class is similar to an OpenStruct but, imho, easier to use. # the otraits shorthand can be used to contruct one # # # options passed as args dynamically create and init traits # config = otraits :port => 42 p config.port # # any passed block does the same but, via a method missi...

I was looking over some of my specs. I was thinking that the following: @game.should_receive(:name).and_return(''The Battle for Blaze'') @game.should_receive(:people).and_return(5000000) @game.should_receive(:activated).and_return(true) Would it look cleaner if I could do this instead? @game.should_recieve_and_return( :name => ''The Battle for Blaze''