search for: occassionali

Hi all, Got some hassles with a client running Sybiz accounting. This is a FoxPro application developed in VB6. We're just through the exercise of eliminating all the pieces that might be causing problems and unfortunately that might include Samba..... Running Samba 2.2.7 on Red Hat 7.3. All clients are running either Windows 2000 or Win XP. We're getting cases of workstations being

I've been struggling with an odd bug in the latest 1.0-stable (20050427) release. Sometimes Dovecot seems to forget that a message has been read or deleted and marks it unread (or not deleted). As far as I've been able to determine, it seems to happen when 1) There have been several recent deliveries 2) Possibly some of those deliveries are of multiple messages 3) Possibly they are read

Hello there, I'm having a weird behaviour with getent (and by extension winbind using wbinfo) when querying for specific user info. I'm running Samba 3.5.4 in Centos 5.7 (3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2) with default options, and securty = ads Everything works fine, but now I'm working on some autoemails with reports and I want to get rid of the user names, using user's first / last names

I've read the back and forth this morning, and I have to side with Vince. 1. Functions that re-interpret their arguments are very dangerous. The original question involved a well formed call to a function, which returned the wrong answer. Bug, design flaw, whatever -- it's a mistake and the best choice would be to fix it. I only consider such behavior in 2 cases: a. when the

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 00:38:47 +0000 (UTC), Gabor Grothendieck <ggrothendieck@myway.com> wrote : >DIFFERENCE BETWEEN USING .RBUILDIGNORE AND NOT > >The reason that the processing is different according to whether one >uses .Rbuildignore or not is that > R CMD build >takes the .Rbuildignore file into account but > R CMD install > R CMD check > R CMD build

Everyone: We're starting to see a rash of password guessing attacks via SSH on all of our exposed BSD servers which are running an SSH daemon. They're coming from multiple addresses, which makes us suspect that they're being carried out by a network of "bots" rather than a single attacker. But wait... there's more. The interesting thing about these attacks is that