search for: num_doc

...t statement index.search(query).size will be effective here. Because it returns an array of found documents. What if such documents will be 100000?? I don''t want to select all this documents, just to know how many found, and then select for example 10 of them index.search_each(query, :num_docs=>PAGE_SIZE, :first_doc=>PAGE_SIZE*(page_num-1)) do |doc_num, score| @documents << index[doc_num] end So quesition is: what is the most effective way to calculate (just calculate) number of found documents? -- anatol (http://pomozov.info) -------------- next part -----------...

Hi, I seem to be having trouble getting more than 10 hits from Index#search_each since upgrading to 0.10.2 (ie, this was working in 0.9.4). Maybe a bug, as the #search_each doesn''t seem to use the options parameter any more ? Thanks, Neville =========================================== require ''rubygems'' require ''ferret'' p Ferret::VERSION idx =

I''m just wondering where I would put the pagination for search results when using "acts_as_ferret". At the moment my search code is.. def search @query = params[:query] || '''' unless @query.blank? @results = Tutorial.find_by_contents @query end end Cheers SchmakO -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...elds=> [''short_description'',...,''date_registered''] def VoObject.find_results(query,page) sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("date_registered", :reverse => :false) results2 = VoObject.find_by_contents(query,:num_docs=> 2000000,:sort =>sort_fields ) num = results2.size if page == 1 page = 0 else page = (page-1)*20 end results = VoObject.find_by_contents(query,:first_doc=>page, :num_docs=> 20,:sort => sort_fields) [num,results,results2] end ############################## I ad...

Hello all I''m using Ferret for a site wide search where I have several kinds of (similar) objects in a central index (using a "type" field containing the class name). This works great, and I can search all objects with one query. What I''d like to do now is to limit the results so that there will be a maximum of 10 (or 5 or whatever) results for each type.. I

Here''s the deal: static TopDocs *isea_search_w(Searcher *self, Weight *weight, int first_doc, // OFFSET int num_docs, // LIMIT Filter *filter, Sort *sort, filter_ft filter_func, bool load_fields) { int max_size = first_doc + num_docs; Actually, when you have limit => :all, num_docs equa...

Hi, I have a max_results limit of 10, whatever value I pass to max_results, even if I drop this option in my class. Same limit using script/console Myclass.find_by_contents(query) Ideas ? Using aaf 9.5. Jean-Christophe Michel -- symetrie.com Better Nested Set for rails: http://opensource.symetrie.com/trac/better_nested_set

I am getting strange results when I reverse sort a query. I am sorting by date, but it doesn''t seem to be related to dates (I have tried just integers). I also paginate the results. Items in the result set are sometimes duplicated and the not ordered at all. When I try a non-reverse sort I don''t see duplicates and the ordering is correct. Any ideas what is going on? Thanks

...objects and running garbage collection. I think the MSetItems are preserved in memory and are not being garbage collected correctly, possibly from a lingering reference to the MSet or MSetIterator. import os import simplejson as json import xapian as x import shutil import gc def make_db(path, num_docs=100000): try: shutil.rmtree(path) except OSError, e: if e.errno != 2: raise db = x.WritableDatabase(path, x.DB_CREATE) for i in xrange(1, num_docs): doc = x.Document() doc.set_data(json.dumps({ 'id': i, 'enabled': True })...

Hi all, I''m trying to figure out how to add a filter into a search. I''ve created the filter, basically copying the location filter from http://blog.tourb.us/archives/ferret-and-location-based-searches. But when I try to call Index.search and pass the filter in a hash with the key :filter, I get back that it is expecting type Data, and so I''m at a loss to figure out

...i''m currently using. sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("sponsorerd") sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_date_registered", :reverse => :true) results = VoObject.find_by_contents(query,:first_doc=>page, :num_docs=> 20,:sort =>sort_fields) Thanks in advance for any replies. regards c -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I am looking to have a number of categories populated from my results of a search. For example, searching on "sport" would display all results for sport. I want to also have a number of categories to refine the documents down. So by clicking on the "Fishing" category or the "Shooting" category, I would only see the results on sport around that category. Now for

...w to sort the results. I have created index with two fields: ''file'' and ''content'' When I give SortField name as ''file'' while searching, it results into error. The exact command given by me: index.search_each("sleepless AND dreams", :num_docs => 100, :sort => ''file'') do |doc, score| .... end My question is how do I give field name for sorting. Thanks and Regards, P L Patodia -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...#{e.message}" # << e.backtrace.join("\n") return field_value end def doc_freq(field, term) self.searcher.doc_freq(field, term) end ############################# # Self Util methods def reader self.searcher.reader end def size if reader total_size = reader.num_docs else total_size = 0 self.sub_searchers.each do |sub_searcher| total_size += sub_searcher.reader.num_docs if sub_searcher.reader end return total_size end end alias :num_docs :size def close self.searcher.close end end

...ve tried two different suggestions. This just returns results in the same order as a search without a sort: sort_fields = [] sort_fields << Ferret::Search::SortField.new("ferret_created_at",:reverse => :true) Comment.find_by_contents("test", :sort => sort_fields, :num_docs => 5) This also doesn''t affect the order: Comment.find_by_contents("test", :sort => ["ferret_created_at"], :num_docs => 5) The following, however, DOES affect the order, but it''s SUPER slow: Ferret::Search::SortField.new("id",:reverse =&g...

Using Ferret for searching, I''ve got results that I need to link to. Which is fine, except for that they''re displayed on paginated pages using Rails paginate function - so it''s not like I can''t get it from the database or anything else. Anyone have any ideas on how to go about this? It''s not so much a coding problem as a theory problem, and I

...aving trouble finding what could be causing this. any help greatly apreciated. relevant code from our rails app: # search_array hold an array of the model we want to search search_array.each do |asset| a = Object.const_get(asset) assets << (a.find_id_by_contents q, :limit => num_docs, :offset => first_doc) end assets.flatten! return assets -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello all, I''ve just recently gotten my ActiveRecord models indexed properly in my Rails App. Woohoo! So I''ve started testing some searches. Is there some limit to acts_as_ferret that only allows it to return 10 results? I''m searching for common terms in my data that I _know_ return many results, but I only ever get at most 10 results. This is in a db with 350k

Hi, I used Ferret to build an index and try to search here. But it looks like it always return only 10 matches results, event the return number of search_each is more than 10. Did I do something wrong? ------------------ n = index.search_each("ruby") do |doc, score| puts index[doc][''file''] end print n ------------------ I can only see 10 lines'' output.

Hi, I''m having some trouble with ferret search_each. I''m posting rails'' script/console output, so I guess you can decrypt it: >> res = [] => [] >> index.search_each(''name: a*'') do |doc, score| ?> res << doc >> end => 50 >> res.size => 10 >> I''m guessing the ''=>50''