search for: ntlmv2i

...363e6545d5644af26235486a0faee309e3e516f3731905cd551976d305e8c32b5f117ae9b This works without issues: smbclient -U username //192.168.20.129/share But this does not work at all: mount.cifs //192.168.20.129/share /mnt/ -o user=username,password=XXXXXXX,sec=ntlmv2 For the record I have tried sec=ntlmv2i, ntlmssp, krb5i, krb5. Here is what I get when I try: With sec=ntlmv2i mount error(22): Invalid argument Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) and dmesg gives: CIFS VFS: Unexpected SMB signature Status code returned 0xc000000d NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER CIFS VFS: Se...

...t you don't have to be an expert to know that aes is better than des-cbc-crc . des was broken in 1998, why is samba kerberos trying to use it? Win 95 LM uses DES -- look at lmHash() documented at http://davenport.sourceforge.net/ntlm.html. We have been using our CentOS clients to mount with ntlmv2i so why would attempts at joining the ADS domain fail with "stronger authentication required"? mount -t cifs //ADScontroller/share /mnt/ntlmv2iprotected --verbose -o username=user at dnsdomainname.com,sec=ntlmv2i Success with "kinit admin at dnsdomainname.com" But then "n...

On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:13:35 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If you mean, Linux <=> Linux , use automounting, of dedicated mounts. > Cifs/nfs, depending on you setup and what you need. > > The problem is, they don't seem to work any more. They all seem to rely on mount.cifs and you need to be root to run this. When

...rname=username,password=super_secret,domain=WRKGRP //ip.of.our.samba/share /mnt > mount error(112): Host is down > Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) Host is up, i can use smbclient to connect, and also coming from windows everything works. I also tried adding sec=ntlmv2i, makes no difference. mount.cifs version: 6.4, debian jessie Could this perhaps have something to do with the new defaults getting in the way? Host down seems such a strange message... The only interesting lines on the samba server (log level 5) is: > [2016/04/18 21:39:44.373051, 5] ../sou...

...xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/paulg /tmp/1 -o user=paulg,uid=2381,gid=1000,sec=ntlmsspi Password for paulg@//xxxxx/paulg:  ********* mount error(13): Permission denied Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) I tried the following security options. sec=ntlmsspi sec=ntlmssp sec=ntlmv2 sec=ntlmv2i With the same results. I wonder why Linux clients having issues?  Any pointers? Thanks Paul ||||||||||--- samba config for AD --- # Global parameters [global]         netbios name = DC1         workgroup  = ONEEXAMPLECA         realm = AD.ONE.EXAMPLE.CA         dns forwarder = 130.63.xx....

...main=WRKGRP >> //ip.of.our.samba/share /mnt >> mount error(112): Host is down >> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) > > Host is up, i can use smbclient to connect, and also coming from windows > everything works. > > I also tried adding sec=ntlmv2i, makes no difference. > > mount.cifs version: 6.4, debian jessie > > Could this perhaps have something to do with the new defaults getting in > the way? Host down seems such a strange message... > > The only interesting lines on the samba server (log level 5) is: > >>...

...t I alway get a "mount error 13 = Permission denied". I tried the following (and many else) mount -t cifs //172.16.0.3/ebooks /mnt/ebooks -o guest mount -t cifs //172.16.0.3/ebooks /mnt/ebooks -o user=someuser,password=somepass (both also with the sec options none,ntlm,ntlmi,ntlmv2,ntlmv2i or smbfs instead of cifs) and always got "mount error 13 = Permission denied". I just wanted samba to map me to the guest-account but it wouldn't!!!! I then tried mount -t cifs //172.16.0.3/ebooks /mnt/ebooks -o user=realuser,password=realpass (where realuser is a privileged use...

Hi list. I am wondering if I am running the right software to get my windows 7 shares mounted. could someone please tell me, what is the difference between samba, and smbclient? at the moment, I have samba and smbclient installed. I also have smbfs installed, though I understand this is deprecated, I just thought I might be able to get smbfs to work whereas I can't get samba, smbclient and