search for: nounix

...rograms ./tmp -o vers=2.1 --> non existent symlinks do not show up --> cannot create symbolic links ("operation not supported") mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o vers=1.0 --> non existent symlinks show up ---> links are created as real links I noticed the mount output shows `nounix` when connecting with 2.1 and 3.0: //ip.addr/Programs on /mnt/tmp type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.0,sec=ntlmssp,cache=strict,username=markus,domain=OFFICE,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip.addr,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nounix,serverino,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,actimeo=1,user=markus)...

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:41:24PM +0200, Xen wrote: > I wrote here how my filenames are getting mangled when getting sent > or received to the server. > > Server: current Ubuntu lookalike. > > Client: Older Synology diskstation with probably a modified mount.cifs. > > When I send utf-8 it gets received as dos. > > "é" for instance is #c3a9 in utf-8, and

...n 'mount', I find these lines: adminuser at testdm12:~$ mount ................. //devstation.samdom.example.com/data on /mnt/test type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.1.1,sec=krb5,cruid=0,cache=strict,multiuser,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=192.168.1.141,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,noperm,rsize=4194304,wsize=4194304,bsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1,closetimeo=1) //devstation.samdom.example.com/Mtest1 on /mnt/testmount1 type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.1.1,sec=krb5,cruid=0,cache=strict,multiuser,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=192.168.1.141,file_...

...3.0 # cd tmp # ln -s bla blub ln: failed to create symbolic link ?blub?: Operation not supported # mount //ip.addr/Programs on /mnt/tmp type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.0,sec=ntlmssp,cache=strict,username=markus,domain=OFFICE,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip.addr,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nounix,serverino,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,actimeo=1,user=markus) I suspect it is because unix extensions are off (there is always "nounix" written in the mount output). I tried the config option "unix extensions = yes" explicitly (should be the default), but no change unfortunately...

...an I do to enforce utf8 being recognised by the server? > > Set the parameter: > > unix charset = utf8 > > in the [global] section of the synology smb.conf. I did that. I fixed it for now by copying what the web interface for the device does (the client). It uses the "nounix" option and this fixes the issue. I had to create a shell script as wrapper to capture its options :p. Actually I tried both "utf8" and "UTF-8" in the config section on the server. I am sorry if I hadn't made that clear, I had thrown away all of the log output I ha...

...show up >> --> cannot create symbolic links ("operation not supported") >> >> mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o vers=1.0 >> --> non existent symlinks show up >> ---> links are created as real links >> >> I noticed the mount output shows `nounix` when connecting with 2.1 and 3.0: >> >> //ip.addr/Programs on /mnt/tmp type cifs >> (rw,relatime,vers=3.0,sec=ntlmssp,cache=strict,username=markus,domain=OFFICE,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=ip.addr,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nounix,serverino,rsize=1048576,wsize=104857...

Hi Ralph, On 05.01.15 15:00, Ralph B?hme wrote: >> [Programs] >> path = /server/shares/programs >> valid users = some users >> read only = No >> force create mode = 0660 >> force directory mode = 0770 >> vfs objects = fruit # tried without fruit vfs, no change > > on first reading I thought this sound

...Samba server still support Unix extensions when connecting over SMB3? My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the "nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the mount option "vers=1.0" to return to SMB1, then Unix extensions are enabled and symlinks work fine. The server is a Seagate NAS appliance running Samba 4.6.2, with "unix extensions = yes" in the [global] section of smb....

...Share Flags: 0x8000 1) \\[REDACTED]\uploaded_files Mounts: 1 DevInfo: 0x20 Attributes: 0x1006f PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: DISK Share Capabilities: None Aligned, Partition Aligned, Share Flags: 0x8000 Optimal sector size: 0x200 MIDs: > * nounix means the server doesn't support unix extensions. These > extensions are only > supported by samba and for SMB1 only at the moment. Work is in progress > to add them to SMB2+. > Will this in any way interfere with "case sensitive = yes" - https://www.samba.org/samba/d...

...n be mounted and accessed easily with cifs: >//vienas01.andritz.com/HIPASE on /media/HIPASE_Q type cifs >(rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,vers=1.0,cache=strict,username=<snip>,domain=<sni >p>,uid=1000,forceuid,gid=1000,forcegid,addr=172.24.180.161,file_mode=0755, >dir_mode=0755,nounix,mapposix,rsize=61440,wsize=65536,echo_interval=60,a >ctimeo=1,user=<snip>) > >The problem seems to have appeared with 2:4.2.14+dfsg-0+deb8u7: >http://metadata.ftp- >master.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/samba/samba_4.2.14+dfsg- >0+deb8u7_changelog > >A very old s...

...rs=@root write list=@root writeable=yes create mask=0770 force create mode=0770 # cat /proc/mounts | grep cifs //10.10.27.203/cifs-share /mnt/cifs cifs rw,relatime,vers=default,cache=strict,username=root,domain=,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=10.10.27.203,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,mfsymlinks,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1 0 0

...` is showing a LOT of options that I did not specify. I do not fully understand their impact: //[REDACTED]/uploaded_files on /home/myuser/shared type cifs (rw,relatime,vers=3.0,cache=strict,username=vl,domain=,uid=1000,forceuid,gid=1000,forcegid,addr=95.216.67.179,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,soft,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1) Namely: forceuid, forcegid, nouinx, serverino, & mapposix Could any of these be causing the problems that I'm observing? PS: vers=3.0 didn't fix the problem! -- Saurabh.

...droid 4 virtual machine (https://www.android-x86.org/releases/releasenote-4-4-r5.html). I can succesfully mount samba shares from the android "terminal emulator", with the following command, for example: --- # android_share su root busybox mount -v -t cifs \ -o username=andy,password=pass,nounix,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime,gid=10028,uid=10023,rw \ //192.168.213.133/android_share /sdcard/android_share --- So far so good. Now I have just upgraded the server machine to "clear linux release 33490". Only the full system upgrade has been performed, with no other changes. After the upg...

...e of link, so I don't think we need > to spend more time with it! > gvfs in Debian 9 also works (as do Windows 7+ and Mac 10.12+). Good. I actually remember fixing something similar now, ha. If you cannot update your kernel I think disabling the unix extension might be a workaround (-o nounix). It will force the use of backslashes. -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

...server using mount -t cifs -o username=x,password=x //foo.com/username /home/lesshaste/work and I get Send error in SETFSUnixInfo = -5 CIFS VFS: Negotiating Unix capabilities with the server failed. Consider mounting with the Unix Extensions disabled, if problems are found, by specifying the nounix mount option. If I then mount with nounix I don't seem to be able to overwrite existing files but strangely I can delete them. This makes editing a file very difficult, for example. Any ideas what is going on? The client is on ubuntu jaunty 9.04. I have attached a compressed (and slightly a...

...rver3 kernel: \ [501348.943600] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -6 Here is the /etc/fstab entry: //sma-server1/pub-data /t2 cifs \ credentials=/home/sma-user3x/.smb/.smbpw, \ uid=sma-user4,gid=users,file_mode=0664,dir_mode=0775, \ sec=lanman,servern=SMA-SERVER1,nocase,noperm,nounix,noserverino 0 0 Any suggestions or changes that will allow the remote volume to mount?

...ernel. The mountpoint and fstab entries are identical and working in openSUSE 12.3 on same system. I just spent several hours on IRC and elsewhere trying to figure this out before thinking to try booting something other than 13.1. :-( Fstab entry (redacted): //HOST/share /mountpoint cifs guest,nounix,uid=####,gid=####,dir_mode=0777,file_mode=0664,noauto 0 0 The host is a Linux satellite receiver, running kernel 3.3.1 and sambaserver 3.0.37-r8. It's configuration options are crippled. Security = user seems not to be an option, but since the device runs on FOSS and there is no manual, whe...

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting

Hello, I'm using the latest git 4.2.0 samba version (4.2.0rc4-GIT-93b73bf, to get latest vfs_fruit module). I noticed the following strange behavior with OSX clients (10.10.1, 10.10.2 beta): When they connect using either smb 3.0 or 2.1 (verified on the server with `smbstatus` and the `version` column `SMB3_00` or `SMB2_10` respectively), symbolic links pointing at non existent files are not

...can be mounted and accessed easily with cifs://vienas01.andritz.com/HIPASE on /media/HIPASE_Q type cifs >>(rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,vers=1.0,cache=strict,username=<snip>,domain=<snip>,uid=1000,forceuid,gid=1000,forcegid,addr=172.24.180.161,\ >> file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,nounix,mapposix,rsize=61440,wsize=65536,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1,user=<snip>) What i noticed here also, and if someone can explain this for me why this is. rsize=61440 wsize=65536 Normaly i see rsize and wsize 65536 By default block size = 1024 but above shows a difference of exact 4096 Is this...