search for: nodeb

...someplace sometime, but it evades me right now. It's also an opportunity to say hello to the list and many thanks for writing and supporting tinc vpn! We make great use of it at rhizomatica. So, Let's take this example setup. I have two tinc nodes (A and B) behind a firewall NodeA and NodeB have 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3 assigned on an internal LAN, and they both have different public IP addresses forwarded to them, port 655 udp/tcp The rest of the nodes C-Z are spread out around the internet. NodeA is our "master" server with all the keys for all nodes, so every node in...

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:03:30AM +0200, Keith Whyte wrote: > I have two tinc nodes (A and B) behind a firewall > > NodeA and NodeB have 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3 assigned on an internal > LAN, and they both have different public IP addresses forwarded to them, > port 655 udp/tcp > > I would like any given node in the C-Z group to be able to find Node B > on it's public IP and therefore not forward via Nod...

AFAIK, and my setups thus far, unless you have NodeB’s public key in Nodes C-Z (with NodeB’s public/reachable IP configured in Nodes C-Z) *and* you have the PublicKeys for NodesC-z configured in NodeB, there is no way that NodesC-Z will be able to establish a connection directly with NodeB, and it’ll have to forward via NodeA (or any other node that...

...sending USR2 to tincd, and ploughing through syslog to figure out which nodes are connected. Could I request that GraphDumpFile dumps a little more data to the file, namely, the subnet; changing the output file from (for example): digraph { nodeA [label = "nodeA"]; nodeB [label = "nodeB"]; } ...to this... digraph { nodeA [label = "nodeA\n172.16.0.0/16"]; nodeB [label = "nodeB\n172.17.1.0/24"]; } Thanks, Peter

I have an rsync server running on nodeA and a client, nodeB. I am attempting to do a sync/copy from the local machine, nodeB, to the rsync server, nodeA. The following line from the rsync man page makes it look like this is relatively simple: for copying from the local machine to a remote rsync server. This is invoked when the destination path contains a...

hi guys I have a kvm quest & two nodes. a kvm guest on nodeA and IPaddr2 on nodeB(at this time) nodeA & nodeB comprise a HA cluster now... - nodeA can ping IPaddr2 IP - nodeB can ping kvm guest IP - kvm guest can get to nodeB's IP but* Only a bit non-common bit in my setup is: - both nodeA & nodeB be interfaces which are relevant to the subnet on which it operates...

Dear all Recently, i did some work to test small files performance for gnfsv3 transport. Following is my scenario. #####environment##### ==2 cluster nodes(nodeA/nodeB)== each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2 netcard nodeA: 10.254.3.77 10.128.3.77 nodeB: 10.254.3.78 10.128.3.78 ==2 stress nodes(clientA/clientB)== each is equipped with E5-2650*2, 128G memory and 10GB*2 netcard clientA: 10.254.3.75 clientB: 10.254.3.76 1) 10.254.3.* is for tes...

...another node. if it not . after call llseek in SEEK_END. the position is old. this bug can be reproduce the following scenario: at first ,we dd a test fileA,the file size is 10k. on NodeA: --------- 1) open the test fileA, lseek the end of file. and print the position. 2) close the test fileA on NodeB: 1) open the test fileA, append the 5k data to test FileA. 2) lseek the end of file. and print the position. 3) close file. at first we run the test program1 on NodeA , the result is 10k. and then run the test program2 on NodeB, the result is 15k. at last, we run the test program1 on NodeA again,...

I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:...

...tatus /sbin/hastctl dump Is it better for this method not to call from a script? or somthing wrong to use it? Also, I don't know how to detect an error of writing to local device from hastd. Does anyone know about it? Thanks, Daisuke Aoyama -- the procstat shows like this: [root at nas4free-nodeb /tmp]# procstat -ka|grep hast 11668 100069 hastd - mi_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep kern_wait sys_wait4 amd64_syscall Xfast_syscall 17981 100406 hastd - mi_switch sleepq_catch_signals sleepq_wait_sig _sleep do_wait __umtx_...

dlm_request_all_locks() should deal with the status sent from target node if DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG is sent successfully, or recovery master will fall into endless loop, waiting for other nodes to send locks and DLM_RECO_DATA_DONE_MSG to me. NodeA NodeB selected as recovery master dlm_remaster_locks() ->dlm_request_all_locks() send DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG to nodeA It happened that NodeA cannot alloc m...

...arget node dlm_request_all_locks() should deal with the status sent from target node if DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG is sent successfully, or recovery master will fall into endless loop, waiting for other nodes to send locks and DLM_RECO_DATA_DONE_MSG to me. NodeA NodeB selected as recovery master dlm_remaster_locks() ->dlm_request_all_locks() send DLM_LOCK_REQUEST_MSG to nodeA It happened that NodeA cannot alloc m...

...another node. if it not . after call llseek in SEEK_END. the position is old. this bug can be reproduce the following scenario: at first ,we dd a test fileA,the file size is 10k. on NodeA: --------- 1) open the test fileA, lseek the end of file. and print the position. 2) close the test fileA on NodeB: 1) open the test fileA, append the 5k data to test FileA. 2) lseek the end of file. and print the position. 3) close file. at first we run the test program1 on NodeA , the result is 10k. and then run the test program2 on NodeB, the result is 15k. at last, we run the test program1 on NodeA again,...

...y tinc in switch mode? and why is "In switch mode, the gateway routes are necessary" mentioned here suddenly? afaik, Subnet is announce by node itself to other nodes. that mean i cannot set, for example. subnet=1.2.3.4/32 in hosts/X within nodeA, while subnet=5.6.7.8/32 in hosts/X within nodeB so, is it correct that i cannot have 0.0.0.0/0 for *two* gateway node as in http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/redirect-gateway/ ? mode=switch/hub instead of router have to be used in this case ?

You have a typo in your routes: fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/6 abcd vs. adcd On 21 May 2015, at 19:35, Martin <martinmoen at gmail.com<mailto:martinmoen at gmail.com>> wrote: I have 2 nodes nodeA and nodeB I'm using tinc 1.1pre11 -- nodeA(fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1) : $ ip -6 route fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 fd80:2015:2105:adcd::/64 dev tun0 metric 1024 fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 $ ping6 fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1 PING fd80:2015:2105:abcd::1(fd80:2015:...

I've been trying out IPv6 networking with tinc and noticed that it will not route smaller segments than /48 If I try to run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd::/64 dev tun0 I get network unreachable However if I run ip -6 route add aaaa:bbbb:cccc::/48 dev tun0 it works fine Is this is a limitation in tinc or the kernel network stack itself? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Keith Whyte <keith at rhizomatica.org> wrote: > Is there a way to force NodeA or NodeB to "advertise" it's public IP to > the rest of the tinc network, or did I miss something really obvious? the config files can use DNS names, right? Have the nodes that you want to advertise their public IP addresses sign up with Dyndns or similar, presto done. -- everything has...

have sent this mail before, but without a subject. Never found any response to it, hope somebody can and will help me this time. LS, I've been trying to set up Samba 3.0.20b on a Debian LDAPv3 server. It all works ok, except for IIS 6. I am using a W2K3Std Server to connect to a Samba domain. This is necessary because of the way IIS authorises it's users. Every website has it's own

I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a 2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in. After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an older Mandrake

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 01:45:00 +0100, Oliver Dzombic wrote: > Hi, > > i try to test live-migration using this command: > > #virsh migrate --copy-storage-all --verbose --live kvm1776 > qemu+ssh://nodeb/system > > > Instant error message: > > error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command 'blockdev-mirror': > Cannot find device=drive-sata0-0-0 nor node_name=drive-sata0-0-0 Hi, for completness I'm re-posting the reply I gave in the bug you filed at https://...