search for: nnnnnnnn

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "nnnnnnnn".

2002 Jul 01
5
[Bug 327] monitor_fdpass.c: Expected 1 got 1075033556 - Privilege Separation
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327 ------- Additional Comments From jmknoble at pobox.com 2002-07-02 04:11 ------- Could you please check the error message again? Is it: mm_receive_fd: recvmsg: expected received 1 got nnnnnnnn or is it this: mm_receive_fd: expected type 1 got nnnnnnnn ? Those are two different problems, within a few lines of each other. The exact text of the error message is important. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the ass...
2014 Dec 04
1
\U with more than 4 digits returns the wrong character
...e in the ?Quotes help page. Having a warning under Windows might be nicer behaviour than silently returning the wrong value too. On 4 December 2014 at 22:24, Mark van der Loo <mark.vanderloo at gmail.com> wrote: > Richie, > > The R language definition [1] says (10.3.1): > > \Unnnnnnnn \U{nnnnnnnn} > (where multibyte locales are supported and not on Windows, otherwise > an error). Unicode character with given hex code ? sequences of up to > eight hex digits. > > > Best, > Mark > > [1] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html > http...
2002 Jul 04
1
runaway smbd processes
...or about 3 users and things returned to normal. The main culprit has an old PC (built 1999) with NT4.0, SP5. smbd.conf excert (names and IP changed for security purposes!): [global] guest account = nobody security = server password server = x.x.x.x workgroup = NNN-NN wins server = nnnnnnnn local master = no lock directory = /var/samba/locks max log size = 5000 log file = /var/samba/logs/log.%m share modes = yes strict locking = yes debuglevel = 7 dead time = 15 getwd cache = yes homedir map = auto_home invalid users = root message command = /bin/ma...
2014 Dec 04
4
\U with more than 4 digits returns the wrong character
If I type a character using \U syntax that has more than 4 digits, I get the wrong character. For example, "\U1d4d0" should print a mathematical bold script capital A. See http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/1d4d0/index.htm On my machine, it prints the Hangul character corresponding to "\Ud4d0" http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/d4d0/index.htm It seems
2006 Jun 25
2
[ISSUE] Unable to divert external calls.
I have a issue trying to understand why Asterisk-PBX, when a SNOM (320 or 360) successfully redirects/diverts a call when it is a local extension, but fails when you enter external number. Both the local extension dial and external extension dial are within the same context [from-sip] and both phones are capable of making external calls. I have looked at the standard sites, but not
2014 Dec 04
0
\U with more than 4 digits returns the wrong character
Richie, The R language definition [1] says (10.3.1): \Unnnnnnnn \U{nnnnnnnn} (where multibyte locales are supported and not on Windows, otherwise an error). Unicode character with given hex code ? sequences of up to eight hex digits. Best, Mark [1] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html http://www.markvanderloo.eu -----------------------...
2002 Feb 25
0
group 'Domain Users' doesn't show up anymore (fwd)
...m running samba 2.2.3a as PDC and the two global groups 'Domain Admins' and 'Domain Users' did work some time ago. I don't know since when, but now only 'Domain Admins' shows up in the usermanager of XP and win2k. In XP 'Domain Users' is replaced by Unix.group.nnnnnnnn, in win2k it is completely missing. On the console 'Domain Users' becomes some cryptic chars: X:\>net group /DOMAIN The request will be processed at a domain controller for domain DEMAG Group Accounts for \\PDC --------------------------------------------------------------------- *??...
2002 Oct 08
2
Mapped drives gets disconnected ?
Hi! I'm running a RedHat 7.2 server with Samba 2.2.3a - but recently I have a problem that mapped drives on Windows 2000 workstations get disconnected and have problems reconnecting (error message is something like "local device name already in use" when I try to browse the drive in Windows Explorer). Any idea what causes this problem ? Regards, /Brian
2018 Jan 26
4
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
...| SIZE        | ADJ        | CNT        | REG_PERM                  | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| This case is like the previous, except the stack size is too large to encode in the compact unwind encoding.  Instead, the function must include a "subq $nnnnnnnn, RSP" instruction in its prologue to allocate the stack.  The offset from the entry point of the function to the nnnnnnnn value in the function is given in the SIZE field. Depending on the exact instructions used to save registers (PUSH versus MOV), the nnnnnnnn value in the instruction strea...
2018 Jan 27
0
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
...| CNT | REG_PERM | > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > This case is like the previous, except the stack size is too large to > encode in the compact unwind > encoding. Instead, the function must include a "subq $nnnnnnnn, RSP" > instruction in its > prologue to allocate the stack. The offset from the entry point of the > function to the nnnnnnnn > value in the function is given in the SIZE field. > > Depending on the exact instructions used to save registers (PUSH versus > MOV), the nnnn...
1999 Oct 23
0
smbfs: patch for directory listing
...he "LastNameOffset" points to the last record in the data area, not to the actual filename. But the code simply does strncpy(mask, lastname, mask_len); where lastname is a pointer to a record looking something like this: 00000000 00000000 14000000 45646974426f7844656661756c742e6a61766100 nnnnnnnn iiiiiiii llllllll n - next record i - file index l - filename length As I understand it the mask should be the string, and not the record. smbclient (libsmb) does the same thing, so it is possibly also wrong. Hacking samba-2.0.6pre1 libsmb/clientgen.c to use infolevel 259 causes the same problem...
2018 Jan 29
2
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
...M | > > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > This case is like the previous, except the stack size is too large to > > encode in the compact unwind > > encoding. Instead, the function must include a "subq $nnnnnnnn, RSP" > > instruction in its > > prologue to allocate the stack. The offset from the entry point of the > > function to the nnnnnnnn > > value in the function is given in the SIZE field. > > > > Depending on the exact instructions used to save registers (PU...
2018 Jan 27
0
[RFC] Improving compact x86-64 compact unwind descriptors
...| CNT | REG_PERM | > |-------------------------------------------------------------------| > > This case is like the previous, except the stack size is too large to > encode in the compact unwind > encoding. Instead, the function must include a "subq $nnnnnnnn, RSP" > instruction in its > prologue to allocate the stack. The offset from the entry point of the > function to the nnnnnnnn > value in the function is given in the SIZE field. > > Depending on the exact instructions used to save registers (PUSH versus > MOV), the nnnn...
2002 Sep 23
2
Trouble with Windows 2000 sp3
Hello, I work in a development shop where we write code for both Linux and Windows, and develop on both OS's on a codebase stored on a Linux drive with Samba shares. Ever since I 'upgraded' my Windows 2000 system to service pack 3, I have been having trouble compiling my code with Visual Studio over this Samba connection. Basically what happens is that Visual Studio reports
2006 Jul 13
3
payment gem, server anomolies
so i have the payment gem working perfectly in our app, running locally on my system. uploaded a copy of the app file structure to our server (a rimu rhel3), but now the payment gem is unresponsive. it throws exceptions with no error message. i''m looking for a suggestion how to debug this. running updated gems and versions on both systems. they seem identical, unless i''m