search for: nicollet

...hans Jul 18 13:01:51 backup1 kernel: [3458254.990199] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Jul 19 04:01:41 backup1 kernel: [3512244.236347] btrfs: unlinked 1 orphans Is this something I have to be afraid of ? Linux debian lenny, pure btrfs partition with no raid, vanilla kernel: 2.6.34. Thanks, -- Xavier Nicollet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hello! Long time ago I created btrfs on /dev/sda After some changes btrfs moved to /dev/sda1 (well, to md, and sda1 is part of md). As result, <btrfs fi show> show me 2 filesystems: new one and old one. Probably I need to do some cleaning. Can someone tell me what to do. fdisk -u -c -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes 81 heads, 63 sectors/track, 765633 cylinders,

Hi, There''s been discussion before on this list on the very small number of hard links supported by btrfs.[1][2] In those threads, an often asked question has been if there''s a real world use case the limit breaks. Also it has been pointed out that a fix for this would need a disk format change. As discussed in bug #15762 [3], there are certainly real-world use cases this

Hello, I have recently compiled Samba 3.0.0 Beta 3 on Debian Woody. I compiled it with LDAPSAM support. After reading and working through the PDF file that comes with Samba 3 to configure the LDAP server I get the following error messages when I do smbpasswd -a <username> sparc10:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/smbpasswd -a ******** New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: failed to add

G'day all, I have Samba 3 beta 3 running on a RH9 box,(OpenLDAP backend) trying to make it a PDC. Everything seems to be working ok (see shares, browse etc) except I cannot add a machine to the domain. Windows XP Pro as the client, (registry settings changed) after I enter the admin user account details to join the domain I get the following error message... The user name could not be

Hello, My company has decided to upgrade everyone from win98 to winXP. So, I've begun the process of setting up a test network to test samba with winXP before the XP rollout begins. I downloaded samba-3.0b1 a couple weeks ago, compiled it, and started configuring it. For the most part everything has been a breeze. I have a winXP SP1a machine on the test network that currently sees

I''m a little concerned about the size of my metadata. I''m doing raid10 on both data and metadata, and: hrm@vlad:mnt $ sudo btrfs fi df /mnt Data: total=488.01GB, used=487.23GB Metadata: total=3.01GB, used=677.73MB System: total=11.88MB, used=52.00KB hrm@vlad:mnt $ find /mnt | wc -l 20137 By my calculations, that''s something on the order of 17.5K per filesystem

Hi, I am trying a test of migrating a NT4 Domain to Samba 3 Beta 3 configured to use LDAP on Redhat 8. Is this possible? Details ------- I previously had Beta 2 on LDAP running as it's own domain controller without problem and could create users (in LDAP) with smbpasswd -a. XP clients could join and login OK. Now I have flushed that setup and have loaded Beta 3 configured to use LDAP,