search for: new_rat

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "new_rat".

Did you mean: new_rate
2007 Jun 01
0
rspec_on_rails, could someone provide an example of using mocks/stubs?
...e point is to isolate the code being tested and remove external dependencies, but I''m not sure how to implement it. Can someone suggest how they would spec the code below: I have a Book model and Review model class Book < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :reviews def update_rating new_rating = 0.0 unless reviews.empty? reviews.each {|r| new_rating += r.rating} new_rating /= review.size end update_attribute(:rating, new_rating) end end The review class is just a standard model with a :rating attribute. Here''s the (empty) spec i came up with: desc...
2019 Apr 24
0
[nbdkit PATCH 4/4] filters: Check for mutex failures
...utex_unlock (&lock); h->id = 0; return h; } diff --git a/filters/rate/rate.c b/filters/rate/rate.c index 978cdc3..cf03541 100644 --- a/filters/rate/rate.c +++ b/filters/rate/rate.c @@ -222,9 +222,8 @@ maybe_adjust (const char *file, struct bucket *bucket, pthread_mutex_t *lock) if (new_rate == -1) return; - pthread_mutex_lock (lock); + ACQUIRE_LOCK_FOR_CURRENT_SCOPE (lock); old_rate = bucket_adjust_rate (bucket, new_rate); - pthread_mutex_unlock (lock); if (old_rate != new_rate) nbdkit_debug ("rate adjusted from %" PRIu64 " to %" PRIi64, @@ -2...
2019 Apr 24
7
[nbdkit PATCH 0/4] More mutex sanity checking
I do have a question about whether patch 2 is right, or whether I've exposed a bigger problem in the truncate (and possibly other) filter, but the rest seem fairly straightforward. Eric Blake (4): server: Check for pthread lock failures truncate: Factor out reading real_size under mutex plugins: Check for mutex failures filters: Check for mutex failures filters/cache/cache.c
2019 Jul 31
13
[nbdkit PATCH 0/8] fd leak safety
There's enough here to need a review; some of it probably needs backporting to stable-1.12. This probably breaks tests on Haiku or other platforms that have not been as on-the-ball about atomic CLOEXEC; feel free to report issues that arise, and I'll help come up with workarounds (even if we end up leaving a rare fd leak on less-capable systems). Meanwhile, I'm still working on my
2019 Aug 02
23
[nbdkit PATCH v2 00/17] fd leak safety
This is a major rewrite compared to my v1 series, where I've tried a lot harder to ensure that we still accommodate building on Haiku (although I have not actually yet fired up a Haiku VM to try it for myself). I also managed to make the sh plugin fully parallel, on capable platforms. See also my question on patch 10 on whether I've picked the best naming convention. Eric Blake (17):