search for: myfw

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "myfw".

Did you mean: myf
2017 Jun 15
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
...m: "CID:+4922222222222" <sip:111111111111 at 192.168.10.33>;tag=d3816d6b-4a00-437b-a525-c2de0f0c3227 To: "root" <sip:91 at 192.168.10.33>;tag=9e9ea185-ea4f-e711-9f85-000db9330d98 Contact: <sip:192.168.10.33:5061> Call-ID: 48b8a185-ea4f-e711-9f85-000db9330d98 at myfw CSeq: 24420 INVITE Allow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, PRACK, REGISTER, REFER, MESSAGE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: FPBX-13.0.191.11(13.16.0) Content-Type: application/sdp Conte...
2012 Dec 04
4
puppetlabs-firewall scope
...d nodes. If I put : resources { "firewall": purge => true } in top scope (i.e. site.pp), then all the firewall rules on all my nodes are purged. Even for nodes for which I don''t apply any module containing specific firewall { ... } resources. If I put it in a module (i.e. myfw ), then for all nodes where I apply a module containing firewall resources, I got a mix of the previous rules (defined locally with the OS) and the new ones provided with puppet. Did I miss something or is it the expected behaviour ? If this is expected, is there a workaround to apply the purge...
2017 Jun 05
3
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 04:26 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > On 06/05/2017 at 06:29 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > >> > >> Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output > >> in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own > >> debug code to see why things
2017 Jun 14
2
asterisk 13.16 / pjsip / t.38: res_pjsip_t38.c:207 t38_automatic_reject: Automatically rejecting T.38 request on channel 'PJSIP/91-00000007'
On 06/14/2017 at 05:53 PM Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017, at 12:47 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> I added this patch to see, if really all packages are are freed after >> they have been processed: >> >> --- b/res/res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c 2017-05-30 19:44:16.000000000 >> +0200 >> +++
2011 Oct 09
2
"What Calls What" diagram. Flow Chart?
I don't know the right computer science words for this question, I'm afraid. Apology in advance. How do you find your way around in somebody else's code? If the user runs a specific command, and wants to know how the data is managed until the result is returned, what to do ? I've tried this manually with tools like mtrace and browser. This is a bit frustrating because the