Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "mx500".
2020 Jun 14
4
very low performance of Xen guests
...during the
last 2 months.? As host I used initially CentOS 6 with latest kernel
available in the centos virt repo at the time of the tests and CentOS 7
with the latest kernel as well. As xen versions I tested 4.8 and 4.12 (
xl info included below ). The storage for the last tests is a Crucial
MX500 but results were similar when using traditional HDD.
??? My problem, in short, is that the guests are extremely slow. For
instance , in the most recent tests, a yum install kernel takes cca 1
min on the host and 12-15 (!!!) minutes in the guest, all time being
spent in dracut regenerating the...
2020 Jun 15
1
very low performance of Xen guests
...host I used
> initially CentOS 6 with latest kernel available in the centos virt
> repo at the time of the tests and CentOS 7 with the latest kernel
> as well. As xen versions I tested 4.8 and 4.12 ( xl info included
> below ). The storage for the last tests is a Crucial MX500 but
> results were similar when using traditional HDD.
>
> ??? My problem, in short, is that the guests are extremely slow.
> For instance , in the most recent tests, a yum install kernel
> takes cca 1 min on the host and 12-15 (!!!) minutes in the guest,
> all...
2020 Jun 15
0
very low performance of Xen guests
...t 2
> months. As host I used initially CentOS 6 with latest kernel available in
> the centos virt repo at the time of the tests and CentOS 7 with the latest
> kernel as well. As xen versions I tested 4.8 and 4.12 ( xl info included
> below ). The storage for the last tests is a Crucial MX500 but results were
> similar when using traditional HDD.
>
> My problem, in short, is that the guests are extremely slow. For
> instance , in the most recent tests, a yum install kernel takes cca 1 min
> on the host and 12-15 (!!!) minutes in the guest, all time being spent in
>...