search for: log_

...hese examples came from a paper by Nelson et al. (Use of the Probability Integral Transformation to Fit Nonlinear Mixed-Models with Nonnormal Random Effects - 2006). Firstly the authors fit a Poisson model with canonical link and a single normal random effect bi ~ N(0;Sigma^2).The SAS routine was: log_s =log(SURVT) cens=1 proc nlmixed data=liver; parms logsig2 = 0 b0 = -2.8 btrt = -0.54 bhrt =0.18; xb= log_s + b0 + btrt * treat + bhrt * heart+ bi; lambda=exp(xb); model cens ~ poisson(lambda); random bi ~ normal(0,exp(logsig2)) subject=INST; run; I obtained the same results for parameters estimat...

Hello, Is there any formula or way to compare slopes of different functions? If we fit 2 functions in our data, and we have 2 slope parameters, how can we compare these slopes? Plotting y=5x and y=exp(5x) in which slope is equal to 5 in both of them.. doesn't seem that it makes sense to compare them. Maybe what I ask is basic statistics.. but you may be aware of some formula that could

...rnal.h b/server/internal.h index e5c7f514..b43798ff 100644 --- a/server/internal.h +++ b/server/internal.h @@ -297,6 +297,9 @@ extern void add_debug_flag (const char *arg); extern void apply_debug_flags (void *dl, const char *name); extern void free_debug_flags (void); +/* log.c */ +extern void log_verror (const char *fs, va_list args); + /* log-*.c */ extern void log_stderr_verror (const char *fs, va_list args) __attribute__((__format__ (printf, 1, 0))); diff --git a/server/log.c b/server/log.c index 73493563..37de3dd2 100644 --- a/server/log.c +++ b/server/log.c @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ #...

Looks like dovecot is not sending stuff to syslog anymore I am getting some message in /tmp/dovecot.log. However the lmtp log files are not even created. bash-5.0# doveconf | grep log_ auth_policy_log_only = no debug_log_path = deliver_log_format = msgid=%m: %$ doveadm_http_rawlog_dir = imapc_rawlog_dir = info_log_path = lmtp_proxy_rawlog_dir = /tmp/lmtp-proxy.log lmtp_rawlog_dir = /tmp/lmtp.log log_core_filter = log_debug = log_path = /tmp/dovecot.log log_timestamp = "%b %d...

...Hat 5.3.12 security patches are in the : standard 5.4.17, except for the patch below. Also, there are more : (different) fixes in 5.4.18 (check h_length against sizeof(sin_addr) : in inet/rcmd.c and inet/rexec.c). : + { : + syslog(LOG_NOTICE|LOG_AUTH, : + "Attempt to feed me an overlong A record. Probably a breakin attempt."); : + host.h_length=4; : + } This came from the linux-server list. But reminded me...

...e command = /bin/mail -s `message from %f on %m' root < %s; rm %s debug level = 3 username map = /opt/samba/lib/user.map map to guest = Bad User ; This next option sets a separate log file for each client. Remove ; it if you want a combined log file. log file = /opt/samba/logs/log_%m_%U.%G.%I ;log file = /opt/samba/logs/log.%m [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = yes read only = no valid users = %S invalid users = root daemon bin sys adm lp smtp uucp nuucp listen nobody create mode = 0750 [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = yes...

...11/08 10:12:08.819620,  0] ../lib/util/fault.c:82(fault_ report)   ============================== ============================== === [2018/11/08 10:12:08.819687,  0] ../source3/lib/util.c:815(smb_ panic_s3)   PANIC (pid 14181): internal error [2018/11/08 10:12:08.820658,  0] ../lib/util/fault.c:261(log_ stack_trace)   BACKTRACE: 16 stack frames:    #0 /usr/lib/samba/sparcv9/ libsamba-util.so.0.0.1'log_ stack_trace+0x18 [0x7ffcb27b6c558]    #1 /usr/lib/samba/sparcv9/ libsmbconf.so.0'smb_panic_s3+ 0x30 [0x7ffcb23d62fa0]    #2 /usr/lib/samba/sparcv9/ libsamba-util.so.0.0.1'smb_ panic+0x40...

...s) client authenticating, when samba tries to start a new smbd instance (as i understand). I saw client authentication success, which interrupts in following places: In case with 4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.12 from ubuntu xenial there is error in `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/libsmbregistry.so.0(log_stack_trace+0x1a) [0x7f2bc30a17aa]` In case with 4.7.5-1 from .../stable/samba-4.7.5.tar.gz there is error in `/usr/local/samba/lib/libsmbconf.so.0(log_stack_trace+0x1f) [0x7f111922a64b]` What should be my further actions? As described in logs: "Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of th...

...am_from_ ldap) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: test [2018/02/26 16:57:37.700693, 3, pid=2994] ../source3/auth/auth.c:256( auth_check_ntlm_password) auth_check_ntlm_password: sam authentication for user [test] succeeded [2018/02/26 16:57:37.700736, 3, pid=2994] ../auth/auth_log.c:760(log_ authentication_event_human_readable) Auth: [SMB2,(null)] user [SAMBA]\[test] at [Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:57:37.700721 GMT] with [NTLMv2] status [NT_STATUS_OK] workstation [THINKPAD-X270] remote host [ipv4:192.168.247.72:39014] became [domain.internal]\[test] [S-1-5-21-2460180081-1733199439-1879006710...

...=========================== INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 9974 (4.7.5) Please read the Trouble-Shooting section of the Samba HOWTO =============================================================== PANIC (pid 9974): internal error BACKTRACE: 49 stack frames: #0 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsmbconf.so.0(log_stack_trace+0x1f) [0x7f0dc796a64b] #1 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsmbconf.so.0(smb_panic_s3+0x6d) [0x7f0dc796a49c] #2 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so.0(smb_panic+0x28) [0x7f0dc9e1139f] #3 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.so.0(+0x2107d) [0x7f0dc9e1107d] #4 /usr/local/samba/lib/libsamba-util.s...

Changes: tools/blktap: remove unneeded pointer dereferencing in convert_dev_name_to_num tools/blktap: constify string arrays in convert_dev_name_to_num tools/blktap: fix params and physical-device parsing tools/blktap: remove unneeded pointer dereferencing from img2qcow.c tools/blktap: remove unneeded pointer dereferencing from qcow2raw.c tools/blktap2: fix build errors caused by Werror in

This creates libnbdkit.so as discussed in the following thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/thread.html#00203 test-delay-shutdown.sh fails for unclear reasons. This series starts by reverting "tests: Don't strand hung nbdkit processes" which is because several other tests fail randomly unless I revert this patch. I didn't investigate this yet so it