search for: llvm3

Problem 2: Configure: ../src/configure --prefix=/tmp/llvm/install --disable-threads --disable-nls --disable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-c-mbchar --program-prefix=llvm- $ make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[1]: Enter...

How to solve this problem? $ make make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' make[1]: Enter...

On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Roman wrote: > How to solve this problem? Java isn't supported. Use --enable-languages=c,c++ -Chris > $ make > make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty' > make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' > make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty/testsuite' > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/llvm3/llvm/build/libiberty...

...lasses.h" needs to include <stdint.h> in order to get the typedef for "intptr_t." If anyone wants me to make a patch for this, let me know. The build error that this solves is: llvm[3]: Compiling DataStructure.cpp for Debug build In file included from /home/ejones/llvm/llvm3/include/llvm/Analysis/DataStructure/DSGraph.h: 20, from /home/ejones/llvm/llvm3/include/llvm/Analysis/DataStructure/ DSGraphTraits.h:19, from DataStructure.cpp:14: /home/ejones/llvm/llvm3/include/llvm/ADT/EquivalenceClasses.h: In constructor `llvm::Equi...

Hi llvm list ! Everything is in the question. I've read this discussion on the mailinglist * [LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/llvm-dev/N3r_a1Vbrog/discussion> . * But since llvm3 and type system rewrite, is it a good idea to rethink about a VM wich could run the IR bytecode directly? llvm has differents bytecode from low level, to more hight level... So do you see some interest to have this kind of VM for one of this bytcode ? Is it hight level enougth like java byte code...

On Jul 18, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Pierre P <ploploplop123 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi llvm list ! > > Everything is in the question. > I've read this discussion on the mailinglist [LLVMdev] LLVM IR is a compiler IR. > But since llvm3 and type system rewrite, is it a good idea to rethink about a VM wich could run the IR bytecode directly? The type system changes you mention changed the way struct types are named and uniqued, but structs are still just structs. This change doesn't really make LLVM IR higher-level in any way...

There is CostModel.cpp since LLVM3, I am wondering if anyone can give me an concrete example on how to use this pass to estimate cycles used in a given IR file. Thank you very much. Don

I was wondering if (and when) is the full C++ compiling support (as it was with llvm3) to be expected (this mainly means the addition of EH to llvm)? Regards, Žiga

Hello, I installed LLVM without problem. I try to build a simple program using LLVM API for code generation from my own AST. I am using Xcode 4.2 for my project with LLVM3 compiler. I setup HeaderSearchPath and LIbSearchPath according my LLVM installation. However I have compilation errors while compiling my source code in standard file <cmath> ! Why? NB: there are no syntax errors in my code, if i follow the procedure to setup a sample project using make it...

Dear All LLVM Users,   I'm new to LLVM environment. I want to perform basic block profiling. I'm using LLVM3.1 I tried it with a simple 'c' code to find Max.No,  mentioned below. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main() {  unsigned int i,temp;    unsigned int num[50]...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/12 12:57 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > > I believe LLVM should drop support for Python 2.4 and 2.5 for 2 main reasons: > > 1) Python 2.4 and 2.5 are end-of-lifed > 2) Python 3 is coming Entering the discussion a bit late, but I'd like to make a plug here for using Cython for any official Python bindings. There are numerous

...h are implemented. FYI: I recently startet working on Python3 bindings for LLVM 3 as all bindings I could find were for LLVM 2.x and up to Python 2.6. I used Cython for easier coding and already ported a big part of Core.h including all Type and Value classes. https://www.gitorious.org/python-llvm3 > [...] > > Gregory Szorc > gregory.szorc at gmail.com Christoph Grenz

There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the interfaces for Object.h and Disassembler.h are implemented. I'd like to stress that things are still rough around the edges, so use at your own risk. I intend to smooth things over in

...llvm-py to work with LLVM 3. Also current llvm-py only supports Python 2.x version, but not Python 3. By supporting Python 3, it can make llvm-py more complete and thus LLVM can be used by more users, which helps in its development. So this project is to finish the two tasks: make llvm-py work with LLVM3 and add Python 3 support *Project Detail* Before writing the proposal, I took a look at llvm-py source code, and had a basic understanding how it works. I wrote a simple document to analysis how it is implemented. (please see the appendix at the end of this proposal). In this section, I list some...

I'd like to continue the discussion about minimum Python versions from the "Use multiprocessing instead of threading" thread in its own thread because I feel it warrants additional discussion. In that thread, we were discussing maintaining support for Python 2.4 and 2.5. The latest response is: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >