search for: llt

...ta for import in an sql database. The database is meant for web-based data entry in a study taking place in a german speaking region, so factor levels of the variables include umlauts. The variables in the dataframe t.muster are generated e.g. like this: t.muster$screening <- rep("ausgef?llt",50) and exported to a .csv file by: write.table(t.muster,"MakeMuster041006/MusterDaten.csv", col.names=FALSE,row.names=FALSE,na="",sep=";") After export the factor level including an umlaut of t.muster$screening look like this in the sql-database as well...

...1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...  $ ALTERKAU_C                     : int  1 2 2 1 3 3 3 4 1 1 ...  $ FAHRL_C                        : int  1 2 1 3 4 3 3 1 5 1 ...  $ NUTZKREIS                      : int  1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 ...  $ RKL_U12                        : int  1 1 1 2 3 4 4 3 5 6 ...  $ SF_Sonder_aufgefüllt           : int  1 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 6 7 ...  $ schw_drittel_c                 : int  1 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 1 1 ...  $ sb_ek_ber                      : num  0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 ...  $ JE_gewichtet                   : num  0.384 3.952 3.952 2.81 3.952 ... I don't u...

...'re heading in the right direction. Changing the partitioning predicate to the instruction opcode rather than the number of operands in the top-level instruction will hopefully cut it down further. I also have a patch that shaves a small amount off of the compile-time by replacing the various LLT::scalar()/LLT::vector() calls with references to LLT objects that were created in advance. I tried something similar with the getRegBankForRegClass() but I haven't written that as a patch yet since that one requires some refactors to get access to a mapping that RegisterBankEmitter.cpp knows. I...

...from the instruction creation. Normally you have to create a generic virtual register with the correct output type. When a lot of intermediate values are needed, this can get pretty messy. There is an alternative provided, but I don’t think it’s really any better. You can construct a DstOp from an LLT, which will create a new register. You would then need to use the returned instruction, get the destination register from the output and use that. This doesn’t allow you to naturally compose operations by using the return value of a build* function to another. I also find this aspect to be pretty e...

...ould prefer to extend the IR type to a bfloat MVT type. I've made a number of patches to implement this up to a point for AArch64. I can post those on Phab and start a thread to sample opinions. Sounds good to me! I also think having bfloat (all floating point types actually) in GISel (i.e., LLT) is also the right long term plan. Maybe something like a pair of two numbers for the number of bits in the mantissa and the number of bits in the exponent would be enough to represent all of them. > > Amara: Ah yes, I see now it was Matt Arsenault who made the comment. And I see he happens...

...> theta.t=theta > beta.t=beta > > # Define log-likelihood function > ll <- function(y, k, c){ > n*log(c*k)-(k+1)*( sum(log(1+c*Y))+sum( R*log(1+c*Y)+1/k ) ) > } > > # Compute the log-likelihood for the initial values, and ignoring the > missing data mechanism > lltm1 <- ll(Yobs, theta.t, beta.t) > > repeat{ > # E-step > > Bbar<- function(theta.t,beta.t){ > sum(R*(1+beta.t*(theta.t+1)*Yobs)/(beta.t*(theta.t+1)*(1+beta.t*Yobs))) > } > > Abar<- function(theta.t,beta.t){ > sum( R* ( log(1+beta.t*Yobs)+ 1/theta.t )) > }...

...n the right direction. >> >> Changing the partitioning predicate to the instruction opcode rather than the number of operands in the top-level instruction will hopefully cut it down further. I also have a patch that shaves a small amount off of the compile-time by replacing the various LLT::scalar()/LLT::vector() calls with references to LLT objects that were created in advance. I tried something similar with the getRegBankForRegClass() but I haven't written that as a patch yet since that one requires some refactors to get access to a mapping that RegisterBankEmitter.cpp knows. I...

...ght direction. >>> >>> Changing the partitioning predicate to the instruction opcode rather than the number of operands in the top-level instruction will hopefully cut it down further. I also have a patch that shaves a small amount off of the compile-time by replacing the various LLT::scalar()/LLT::vector() calls with references to LLT objects that were created in advance. I tried something similar with the getRegBankForRegClass() but I haven't written that as a patch yet since that one requires some refactors to get access to a mapping that RegisterBankEmitter.cpp knows. I...

...;> >> Changing the partitioning predicate to the instruction opcode rather than >> the number of operands in the top-level instruction will hopefully cut it >> down further. I also have a patch that shaves a small amount off of the >> compile-time by replacing the various LLT::scalar()/LLT::vector() calls >> with references to LLT objects that were created in advance. I tried >> something similar with the getRegBankForRegClass() but I haven't written >> that as a patch yet since that one requires some refactors to get access to >> a mapping t...

...gt w?rde. Muss ich dann entsprechend einfach auf die verweisen? Ich versuchte gerade die address_verify_map = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache auf local_recipient_maps = btree:$data_directory/verify_cache verweisen zu lassen. Leider ohne Erfolg. Bisher ist verify_cache n?mlich leider noch unbef?llt. Entsprechend bekomme ich folgende Fehler: Dec 1 16:16:29 test-mail postfix/smtpd[5550]: warning: btree:/var/lib/postfix/verify_cache is unavailable. open database /var/lib/postfix/verify_cache.db: No such file or directory Dec 1 16:16:29 test-mail postfix/smtpd[5550]: warning: btree:/var/lib/po...

...this error message: ------------ [...] Compiling regapi... rm -f regapi && ln -s ../../wine regapi Preparing to install default Wine registry entries... Installing default Wine registry entries... wineserver: request.c:235: write_request: Zusicherung ?thread->pass_fd == -1? nicht erf?llt. ------------ Any ideas? Platform ist Mandrake 7.2. My last try at wine was the codeveawers preview, but I have deinstalled this. TIA Ulrich.

...t-lda -d $USER -o "plugin/quota=maildir:User quota:noenforcing" From: postmaster at domain.de Subject: $PERCENT% Mail quota warning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Der Speicherplatz Ihres E-Mail-Postfaches ist zu $PERCENT% gef?llt. Bitte l?schen Sie alte und unerw?nschte E-Mails vom Server, um den Emfang neuer E-Mails aufgrund Speicherplatzmangels nicht zu behindern. Your mailbox with us is now more than $PERCENT% full. To avoid mail loss due to lack of sufficient space, please remove old and unwanted mails from the server....

Hi, GlobalISel currently drops all type information relating to the integer/FP distinction during the IR translation pass, as the LLT types only represent whether a value is a scalar/vector/pointer and it’s size/shape. To compensate, later passes use the FP operations on those values to guess what kind of value is being stored within that virtual register. This means that i32/float loads get translated into the same thing, and o...

...18:12 > To: LLVM Developers' List > Cc: Matt Arsenault > Subject: [llvm-dev] RFC: [GlobalISel] propagating int/float type information > > Hi, > > GlobalISel currently drops all type information relating to the integer/FP distinction during the IR translation pass, as the LLT types only represent whether a value is a scalar/vector/pointer and it’s size/shape. To compensate, later passes use the FP operations on those values to guess what kind of value is being stored within that virtual register. > > This means that i32/float loads get translated into the same th...

...ing instructions. Because of that, approach from regbankselect that iterates through uses of G_LOAD def register and checks if some of the uses was an generic floating point instruction should not be an option for legalizer. Since GlobalISel Legalizer cannot distinguish between them using only LLT, only other option that I can see at this moment is having "F" variant of the generic instruction (like this is the case with G_ADD and G_FADD). Is this change possible? Or are there some other approaches for dealing with this problem? Petar

...from the instruction creation. Normally you have to create a generic virtual register with the correct output type. When a lot of intermediate values are needed, this can get pretty messy. There is an alternative provided, but I don’t think it’s really any better. You can construct a DstOp from an LLT, which will create a new register. You would then need to use the returned instruction, get the destination register from the output and use that. This doesn’t allow you to naturally compose operations by using the return value of a build* function to another. I also find this aspect to be pretty e...

...rage in MachineInstr, or through an additional operand to store type information (a single bit per operand should suffice). These come with the drawbacks of either increasing the size of MachineInstr, or breaking existing code that deals with intrinsics by adding a new operand somewhere. Change the LLT types in GISel to distinguish between fp and integer types. This seems like the most natural fix in that we match the IR type system more closely, but it also has very significant impacts on the existing GISel codebase. An fp “flag” on a type that only affects types used by intrinsics sounds tempti...

...s1 as legal type and ignore it later? > I'm not sure what you mean here > For example lets look at AArch64 G_SELECT:   getActionDefinitionsBuilder(G_SELECT)       .legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s64, s1}, {p0, s1}})       .clampScalar(0, s32, s64)       .widenScalarToNextPow2(0); In this case LLT of operand 1 (s1) in G_SELECT has size 1, and corresponding register class in selected instruction has size 32 (that is $src1 in AArch64::ANDSWri, it has GPR32 regsiter class). For that reason s1 is practically ignored and silently converted to s32. We could get similar result if we have:   get...

...rch64 doing with all of its legalization rules when they don’t seem to actually be implemented? Is the target selector supposed to be responsible for handling G_UNMERGE_VALUES/G_MERGE_VALUES/G_EXTRACT/G_INSERT/G_SEXT/G_ZEXT/G_ANYEXT for any strange type source, assuming the extra high bits over the LLT type are undefined or appropriately extended? For vectors, is any arbitrary vector only supposed to be legalized to a certain number of elements, and the target is supposed to treat this as N registers with possibly undefined high bits in NumRegBits - TypeScalarSize? Should the legalizer for some o...

...k #we want to add a column, that shows the daily drinkingvolume in relation to the persons max-vol. evaluation[,"relDrink"]= evaluation$vol/getMaxVal(evaluation$name) # # this brings the error: # #Warning message: # Korrupter Data Frame: Spalten werden abgeschnitten oder mit NAs # aufgefüllt in: format.data.frame(x, digits = digits, na.encode = FALSE) errortest= evaluation$vol/getMaxVal(evaluation$name) errortest # this brings: # numeric(0) #target was the following: #show in each line the daily consumed beer per person and in the next column #the all time max consumed beer for thi...