search for: last_uids

Hi, Dec 5 20:24:31 dovecot: imap(xx at yy.zz,7ckWZu1CuZFVTILa): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 7292 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) Dec 5 20:24:32 dovecot: imap(xx at yy.zz,LnAlZu1COBVVTILa): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 549 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0) Dec 5 20:24:32 dovecot: imap(xx at yy.zz,LnAlZu1COBVVTILa): Error: Raw backtrace:

Hi, Wrong UIDs are returned from mailbox_transaction_commit_get_uids() in dovecot-1.1.rc3. The problem is in: int mailbox_transaction_commit(struct mailbox_transaction_context **t) { uint32_t tmp; return mailbox_transaction_commit_get_uids(t, &tmp, &tmp, &tmp); } It should be: int mailbox_transaction_commit(struct mailbox_transaction_context **t) { uint32_t tmp1,

Hello! I just installed Dovecot's latest nightly build (20081020) and tried the virtual folder features. I started with a really simple "all" folder: | # virtual/all | * | all But selecting this folder causes dovecot to panic (in most cases). While trying to debug this, I got slightly different results and I am not really sure yet if this is just non-deterministic, depends on

With just one user, on a virtual hosting system with several hundred users spread across a couple of dozen domains, there is the following error, repeated a couple of times a second without variation, when the user tries to connect with Thunderbird to read his mail: dovecot: Panic: IMAP(*******@****.co.uk): file mail-index-view.c: line 265 (view_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid

Hi, On 05-Dec-16 20:28, Toni Mattila wrote: > Panicing stopped when all index files where deleted. It happens again in same user account, so rebuilding indexes didn't fix it. Here's bt full instead of just bt: #0 0x001d4402 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0x00949d70 in raise () from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2

Hai Rowland, Maybe i didnt understand your reply that well, but why would you change it. All (linux) users have minimum_uid=1000 and start at 1000. All (windows) users (samba) are above minimum_uid=1000 So in my optinion, you should not be needed to change this. Unless your users start below 1000. Also cat /etc/adduser.conf shows ( For Debian/Buster ) # FIRST_[GU]ID to LAST_[GU]ID

All, maybe that's a similar issue like the one mentioned in [1], nevertheless I started a new thread. Using public folders: location = maildir:/var/vmail/public/:LAYOUT=fs:INDEXPVT=%h/.public-indexes When deleting a public maildir in filesystem (rm -rf ...) and copying back from backup, it's older than the users' dovecot.index.pvt files. (%h is in another directory). Then the

hi, running dovecot-0.99.10-rc2 on NetBSD, client is Entourage on MacOS 9.2. sylpheed on NetBSD does not show this behaviour. --snip-- Jun 23 16:28:15 host imap(user): file mail-index.c: line 619 (mail_index_lookup_uid_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0 && last_uid > 0) --snap-- any hints? thanks, TOM -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

i installed qmail + vpopmail + dovecot.i installed dovecot without problems.but i run telnet localhost 143 x login user password it seems to error about first_uid.and i change first_uid vpopmail_uid (89) its ok.but i dont understand first_uid.and sholud i change last_uid , first_gid ,last_guid . do you recommend it thanks everynbody ____________________________________________________

Version: 2.2.12 OS: Debian wheezy x86_64 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 547 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid > 0) 2014 Mar 11 20:06:53 ptb-test imap(flor_hardy): Fatal: master: service(imap): child 2760 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation,

...ls from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2 Core was generated by `imap'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. [New process 10317] #0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007faa60c55bc8 in fts_backend_get_all_last_uids (backend=0x12a0be0, pool=0x1925800, last_uids=0x18c5628) at fts-api.c:86 No locals. #2 0x00007faa60c57b73 in fts_build_init_virtual (fctx=0x18c5580) at fts-storage.c:416 vctx = (struct fts_search_virtual_context *) 0x18c5608 last_uids = (struct fts_backend_uid_map *) 0x7fff69c06d...

I upgraded 2.1 -> 2.2 something like a week ago because I needed INDEXPVT. Not sure if this crash started immediately or not, noticed it today looking at journalctl. Backtrace http://bpaste.net/raw/181944/ and pasted below. This seems to crash on every IMAP connection made, so any ideas for a possible client-level workaround are quite welcome until dovecot code improves here. root at

Op 06/01/2019 om 01:00 schreef Joan Moreau: > Anyone willing to explain those functions ? > > Most notably " get_last_uid" From src/plugins/fts/fts-api.h: /* Get the last_uid for the mailbox. */ int fts_backend_get_last_uid(struct fts_backend *backend, struct mailbox *box, ??? ??? ??? ???? uint32_t *last_uid_r); The solr sources (

THank you Now, for the results I see the member of fts_result is : ARRAY_TYPE(seq_range) definite_uids; I have the UID as a aray of uint32_t * How to put my UIDs into this "definite_uids" ? Obviously this is not a simple array/pointer. How to say someting similar to result->definite_uids[1]=my_uid ? On 2019-01-12 10:25, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 11 Jan 2019, at 21.23,

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:52:20 -0500 lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 12/6/2016 1:49 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:38:49 +0100 > > Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> Am 06.12.2016 um 19:15 schrieb lingpanda101 via samba: >

for the "last uid"-> this is not the last added, but the maximum of the UID in the indexed emails, right ? On 2019-01-06 11:53, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > Thank you > > I still don't get the "build_key" function. The email (body, hearders, .. and the uid) is the one (and only) to index . What "key" is that function referring to ? Or is the

On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:38:49 +0100 Marc Muehlfeld via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Am 06.12.2016 um 19:15 schrieb lingpanda101 via samba: > > Does the wiki contain documentation on how to join a Linux > > workstation to Samba? I can't seem to find it. I do see this > >

Hi, When searching in a virtual mailbox imap process crashes if the virtual mailbox has a lot of physical mailboxes behind (more than 80 - 100 mailboxes). Dovecot 2.2.18 build from sources ./configure --prefix=/opt/dovecot2 --with-mysql --with-sqlite --with-solr --with-ssl --disable-rpath --disable-static. Debian Wheezy 3.2.63-2 x86_64. Filesystem is ZFS. docecot -n : # 2.2.18:

A negated subject search on an empty folder causes an assertion failure in doveadm. To reproduce: bash-3.2# doveadm mailbox create -u ephraim "Freshly Empty" bash-3.2# doveadm search -u ephraim mailbox "Freshly Empty" NOT subject '***JUNK MAIL***' doveadm(ephraim): Panic: file mail-index-map.c: line 548 (mail_index_map_lookup_seq_range): assertion failed: (first_uid

For "rescan " and "optimize", wouldn't it be the dovecot core who indicate which are to be dismissed (expunged), or re-ask for indexing a particular (or all) uid ? WHy would the backend be aware of the transactions on the mailbox ??? There is alredy "fts_backend_xxx_update_expunge", so I beleive the management of the expunged messages is *NOT* in the backend,