search for: kundr

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "kundr".

2006 Mar 31
1
domain stripping searcing for ages
X-Tech Space-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Tech Space-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Tech Space-MailScanner-From: redhat at techspace.nl I use pam to login my users are stored as j.hendriks now i like to use 2 domains but with the same user and passw and the option that de mail is stored in a difrent directory but i cant get rit of the @domain
2006 Aug 11
3
IMAP4rev1 broken with evolution
Hi, I'm running 1.0rc6 on Solaris/SPARC, compiled myself against openssl. Client is Evolution 2.6.2 on my gentoo x86 laptop. As Dovecot is not yet productive, we run it parallel to UW-imap, on other ports. I use TLS. If I configure my evolution client with server-type IMAP, everything works fine. However, dovecot claims IMAP4rev1 support. However, when I set server-type to IMAP4rev1 in
2006 Sep 16
3
Dovecot using authsasld
Hi, Trying to simplify the postfix/dovecot/saslauthd setup with less than 10 users, I was looking for some way to NOT duplicate the username/password setup. Currently I need to use a seperate file for dovecot as I do for saslauthd. (One is a simple shadow-alike file, the other the sasldb) I know that postfix 2.3 can use dovecot directly for sasl authentication, and that would be a neat
2006 Sep 16
3
put procmail between postfix and dovecot
Hello, a couple of months ago, also thanks to help from this list, I set up postfix and dovecot for virtual domains on a Centos 4 remote server. I have postfix set up to deliver all email for marco at domain1.net to /var/mail/vhosts/marco_domain1.net/ Everything is fine, as far as postfix is concerned: all email to marco at domain1.net goes in that mailbox, dovecot sees it, etc... Now I need
2006 Apr 07
2
IMAP threading - the THREAD command
Hi folks, there's an extension [1] to IMAP specifying the THREAD command to return list of message sequence numbers grouped to indicate the threading of them. That draft currently defines two algorithms, one of them based solely on Subjects (which is rather dumb) and the second one, combining Subjects with In-Reply-To (etc) headers. The second method is actually advertised and supported by