search for: keld

...t is on would there be keys stored in the memory on the machine logged in to (thus findable in /proc), or will ssh-agent there always refer back to the machine logged in from? Would there be a way for ssh-agent to have the keys stored in memory, so that is not easily found in /proc? Best regards Keld Simonsen

...23 24 8.957402 9.019376 9.079867 9.139289 9.196752 9.250495 9.302067 9.351347 25 26 27 28 9.398927 9.446950 9.496094 9.545979 Why does predict not give me any predictions? The result of predict() is same lenght (28) as the us and us.p variables. best regards keld

...ue. I then try to: a = NA; if (a == NA) { a = 0} just to try it out, but it says Error in if (a == NA) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed What is wrong, and can I do it smarter? I looked at na.action but I don't see how it affects addition of vectors, nor time series. Best regards keld

Hi I got a strange error, happening on two of my ext3 partitions. What can be wrong? And why does e2fsck error out, instead of displaying an error message? Best regards keld fsck /dev/hda6 fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) Warning... fsck.ext3 for device /dev/hda6 exited with signal 11. also From my dmesg: <1>general protection fault: e7a8 [#3] Modules linked in: i915 drm snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device sn...

I often get the message: EXT2-fs warning (device hda6): ext2_fill_super: mounting ext3 filesystem as ext2 I have googled for a reason and a way to solve this - but not found something I could use. Maybe somebody here konws what to do? best regards keld

Hi! I had problem yesterday with e2fsck. It reported a bad superblock. I then tried to use one of the other superblocks. To no avail. Then later I remembered that I had switched the fs type to xfs. Maybe e2fsck could recognize other common fs types, and report this instead? best regards keld

...d they have the same problem. What I do now, is to mount the raid directory on the mirror tree, but that is ugly, as I cannot unmount it again, unless the raid fs is idle, which seldom happens:-( Any good suggestions? Have I overlooked a subtle option in rsync that does this for me? best regards keld

We are running a benchmark that does single threaded 512 KB writes to a LUN on a CLARiiON storage array. The dual Xeon host (Dell 2650) with 4 GB of memory runs RHEL 4U3 We measured the write bandwidth for writes to the block device corresponding to the lun (e.g. /dev/sdb), a file in an ext2 filesystem and to a file in an ext3 file system. Write b/w for 512 KB writes Block device 312 MBps Ext2

Hello, We have run and stopped by chance command "fsck -y" on one of our raid disks (with ext3 file system). After that we have found that SOME files disappeared (they are not seen in the directories where they have been before). The data are extremely important and contain a lot of programs, scripts for some data analysis and very hard to recover by hands. I have run ''fsck

...may have been reused unfortunately means that there may be errors in the salvaged files. So check them afterwards. The code is alpha and has only been tested on a Linux i386 system Salvage is an addition to the debugfs program in the e2progs package by Ted Ts'o. Download: http://www.dkuug.dk/keld/e2fsprogs-1.38-ks1.tar.gz. Then follow INSTALL instructions. Author: Keld Simonsen, keld at dkuug.dk

Having just spent a day trying to recover a deleted ext3 file for a friend, I'm wondering about this way of maintining undelete information in ext3, like is done for ext2: The last step in the deletion process would be to put back the (previously zeroed) block pointers. Since it gets logged to the journal, I _think_ that this should be safe. The worst that would happen is that, if the plug

I have a damaged Ext3 filesystem which fsck has not been able to recover. If I try to mount it, I get a message like this in dmesg: EXT3-fs error (device sda1): ext3_free_blocks_sb: bit already cleared for block 2370866 If I try fsck on it, I get a series of messages like this: Inode bitmap for group 0 is not in group. (block 0) Relocate<y>? Up to group 95. Some say

For my rsync daemon, I would like it to log in a format that I could run some stats on, eg by webalizer that I use for http and ftp transfers. Is that doable? best regards keld

...ly the daemon runs root to get the 873 port opened. And when transfers then run, they run as nobody. I would like the rsync daemon to connect to 873 (as root) then possibly do a chroot and then run always as something else than root (maybe nobody). It this advisable? Is it possible? best regards keld

...y 3 GB in under 2 minutes. The fs type I would like to unpack is ext3 - but other fs types should be doable as well. Then I would like to run the cd from the cdrom drive, so some kind of live-cd running code should also be available. Has this been done before? Is the idea feasible? best regards keld

A couple of years ago there was a discussion on lkml under the thread 'PATCH - ext2fs privacy (i.e. secure deletion) patch' about zapping deleted data in the filesystem as a security mechanism. The discussion wandered off into how 'chattr +s' could be implemented and whether encrypting filesystems wouldn't be a better solution to the problem. I've been maintaining a