search for: issp

...[1], though I am now trying to 'answer' it myself by digging in and actually coding a bit more myself, however, as you can see I'm still a bit stuck :-( Thanks for any suggestions, Carson [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at r-project.org/msg130145.html -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...drogram(result) where merges is as above, and membership is: > membership [1] 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Any thoughts on how to convert a dendrogram object to an hclust or phylo object, or barring that, another way to plot a radial dendrogam in R? Regards, Carson -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...e with a modified mmlcr.poisonce function due to errors in the version available here: http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/mmlcr/. See also http://jeldi.com/Members/jthacher/tips-and-tricks/programs/r/mmlcr section "Bugs?" subsection "Poisson". -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...g that is easy enough to program or compute using existing packages... Thanks in advance, Carson [1] Cameron, A.C., Windmeijer, F.A.G., 1996. R^2 measures for count data regression models with applications to health-care utilization. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 14, 209?220 -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...have my data in order to be able to run such a model following the glm syntax? I know this should be relatively straight-forward, I just can't seem to get my head wrapped around it at all? If it helps, I can provide some sample data to those who request it. TIA, Carson -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...re. Frankly I'm pretty stumped on this one, and I don't think posting any code in this case will enlighten any one! Thanks in advance for any tips or pointers. P.S. I'm not married to using flexmix, though I do like the implementation and extensibility so far. -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...[1] MatrixModels_0.2-1 pscl_1.03.6 gam_1.03 akima_0.5-4 [5] coda_0.13-5 mvtnorm_0.9-92 lmtest_0.9-27 zoo_1.6-4 [9] Matrix_0.999375-48 lattice_0.19-17 MASS_7.3-7 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] grid_2.12.2 tools_2.12.2 -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

...2L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 52L, 53L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 57L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, 66L, 67L, 68L, 69L, 70L, 72L, 73L, 74L, 75L, 76L, 77L, 78L, 79L, 80L), class = "data.frame") Regards, Carson -- Carson J. Q. Farmer ISSP Doctoral Fellow National Centre for Geocomputation National University of Ireland, Maynooth, http://www.carsonfarmer.com/

We've been trying unsuccessfully to connect our Meridian Option 81C to a TE110P via PRI. We've followed the directions in asterisk-meridian-a1.pdf (link on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+legacy+integration), but it doesn't seem to work on our 81C (even though many, many users report it works very well on Option 11's). Has anyone had any success in getting the above

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on individual LSM decision. Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the ability to specify one

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on individual LSM decision. Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the ability to specify one