search for: is_dir_share

...k_freebsd_root (guestfs_h *g, struct inspect_fs *fs) diff --git a/src/inspect-fs.c b/src/inspect-fs.c index 1951678..9f7630b 100644 --- a/src/inspect-fs.c +++ b/src/inspect-fs.c @@ -245,8 +245,10 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, is_dir_bin && is_dir_share && guestfs_is_dir (g, "/local") > 0 && - guestfs_is_file (g, "/etc/fstab") == 0) - ; + guestfs_is_file (g, "/etc/fstab") == 0) { + if (guestfs_int_check_linux_usr (g, fs) == -1) + return -1; + } /* CoreO...

Hi, this patch series improves the way /usr filesystems are handled: tag them appropriately, so later on we can find them and merge results they contain directly back for the root filesystem. Changes in v2: - removed patches #1 and #2, already pushed - drop patch #3, no more needed - replace patch #4 with a better suggestion from Rich - change if into assert in patch #5 Thanks, Pino Toscano

Hi, this patch series improves the way /usr filesystems are handled: tag them appropriately, so later on we can find them and merge results they contain directly back for the root filesystem. The series includes also a new private debug API, and its usage to fix the resolution of /dev/mapper/.. devices found in fstab; without it, LVM /usr filesystems are not recognized as belonging to their

...ir_bin && @@ -246,6 +257,14 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, guestfs_is_dir (g, "/local") > 0 && guestfs_is_file (g, "/etc/fstab") == 0) ; + /* CoreOS /usr? */ + else if (is_dir_bin && + is_dir_share && + guestfs_is_dir (g, "/local") > 0 && + guestfs_is_dir (g, "/share/coreos") > 0) { + if (guestfs_int_check_coreos_usr (g, fs) == -1) + return -1; + } /* Linux /var? */ else if (guestfs_is_dir (g, "/log") >...

...ir_bin && @@ -246,6 +257,14 @@ check_filesystem (guestfs_h *g, const char *mountable, guestfs_is_dir (g, "/local") > 0 && guestfs_is_file (g, "/etc/fstab") == 0) ; + /* CoreOS /usr? */ + else if (is_dir_bin && + is_dir_share && + guestfs_is_dir (g, "/local") > 0 && + guestfs_is_dir (g, "/share/coreos") > 0) { + if (guestfs_int_check_coreos_usr (g, fs) == -1) + return -1; + } /* Linux /var? */ else if (guestfs_is_dir (g, "/log") >...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid