Displaying 20 results from an estimated 48 matches for "inostor".
Did you mean:
iastor
2003 Apr 26
0
ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of perm issions)
...s are not an issue.
ACLs can quickly become out of control and difficult to manage/backup. If
you do have a definite requirements for ACLs then I would consider
restricting their use to only those shares which require them.
HTH
Noel
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Dickson [mailto:tdickson@inostor.com]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 9:46 PM
To: samba mailing list
Subject: RE: [Samba] ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of
permissions)
Now I'm confused. What exactly does the inherit ACLs parameter do? From
simple tests, it seems to work the same with or with out it. Is there som...
2003 Oct 09
1
Release date for Samba 3.0.1?
...: SHA1
Is there a tentative release date for 3.0.1 yet?
I'd like to go live with an official release as opposed to hand patching
all the little fixes I've seen on the mailing list (i.e., sorry about
that; here's a patch, will be in 3.0.1).
Thank you for all your work!
- -Tom Dickson
InoStor, Inc.
http://www.inostor.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/hYgO2dxAfYNwANIRAoU6AJ42+yCinDbicCYNYJMHVscKpzj0hQCeMQ0y
XpTkme6CCzxaUKPrWWqDdKY=
=lLx8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2003 Apr 24
1
ACLs and Windows 2000 look alike (inheritance of permissions)
I've gotten samba working with ACLs over an XFS filesystem. Everything works
pretty well with knowledge of the workarounds (cannot remove group everyone,
etc.)
The only major problem I have is that ACLs don't inherit correctly. The
default in Windows 2000 is to have a sub folder inherit the permissions of
the folder it is in on creation. By default, the Samba share's folders don't
2003 Oct 21
2
PATCH to Samba 3.0.0 to allow interactive --set-auth-user for wbinfo
...e it prompt
Password:
This is to make it easier to script wbinfo for nas appliances using
expect to allow passwords with characters that bash doesn't like: '!*\,%
etc. This also prevents the password from being seen by ps auwx which
some may consider to be a security risk.
- -Tom Dickson
InoStor Corporation
13000 Gregg St
Poway, CA 92064-7151
www.inostor.com
858-726-1846
<TEXT OF PATCH>
- --- samba-3.0.0beta3/source/nsswitch/wbinfo.c Wed Jul 16 06:24:00 2003
+++ samba-nuevo/source/nsswitch/wbinfo.c Fri Aug 29 13:50:06 2003
@@ -756,8 +756,13 @@
~ if (password) {
~ *pa...
2003 Apr 21
1
Samba unable to validate usernames; winbind works
Running the command:
wbinfo -aDOMAINNAME+Administrator%password
works, in fact, all of the wbinfo commands report data as they should.
However, when I try to connect to a share on the SMB server, I get the
following error message in the logs:
[2003/04/21 08:28:59, 0]
smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1328)
connect_to_domain_password_server: machine DWP rejected the tconX on
2003 Sep 04
0
[Fwd: Re: Macro expansion in valid users = line?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sorry about that: enigmail got over excited!
- -------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Samba] Macro expansion in valid users = line?
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 13:15:42 -0700
From: Tom Dickson <tdickson@inostor.com>
To: Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org>
CC: samba mailing list <samba@lists.samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309041512170.4688-100000@onterose>
Bug 397
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397
We're using write list instead; that works.
I've got...
2004 Mar 26
1
Standard procedure for changing smb.conf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
What is the standard procedure for making edits of smb.conf take hold?
For example, what I'm seeing is a share that has given R/W access to a
user named Tom, when I change Tom to read only, he is still able to
write to that share until I stop Samba and restart it.
The documentation seems to refer to a 1 minute reread of smb.conf, but I
don't
2004 Sep 27
3
Make archive bit map to ACL?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Would it not be possible to make the archive bit map to a Posix extended
ACL instead of to the execute bit?
- -Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBWDuj2dxAfYNwANIRAvmnAJ4r1Q/2X7YyPKgGWbnnB3pv6WKDjwCgn+Vd
8USnnc35+uAa2GxUmejlDBc=
=Bu48
-----END PGP
2004 Nov 02
1
net ads join fails
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
~ /usr/bin/net ads join -Udennisb
dennisb password:
[2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006)
~ Host account for if-srv-hos1 already exists - modifying old account
[2004/11/02 17:31:56, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_join_realm(1342)
~ ads_add_machine_acct: No such object
ads_join_realm: No such object
Also:
net user | wc -l
reports
2003 Nov 06
1
RE Samba 3, recycle vfs and symbolic links
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Perhaps using a MS-DFS share would be more useful in this case? This
would allow three real shares: \\server\accounting \\server\personal
\\server\public which would appear as \\server\users\accounting
\\server\users\personal \\server\users\public.
See http://samba.org/~jht/HOWTO/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf for more
information on MS-DFS
- -Tom
2004 May 07
3
Samba 3.0.3 breaks domain somehow.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
After upgrading from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 in a Windows 2000 Native Domain
environment, 9x clients can't connect and wbinfo -t doesn't work:
bash-2.05a# wbinfo -t
checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed
error code was NT_STATUS_PIPE_NOT_AVAILABLE (0xc00000ac)
Could not check secret
Downgrading to 3.0.2 fixes this.
I can get log files, but
2003 Apr 16
1
Samba 2.2.5 issues?
According to Peter Freeman:
>Samba 2.2.5 had a couple of interesting issues, particularly with Win2k
>clients, try upgrading to the latest (2.2.8a) before doing attributing
>any blame to Samba.
I'd like to know the interesting issues. We haven't upgraded from 2.2.5 to
2.2.8a because we see a performance drop, instead; we back port the bug
fixes - open source is great!
We plan
2003 Jun 04
1
Winbind Cache not updating
I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on Redhat 7.3.
The issue I'm seeing (besides Domain Local Groups not being seen by winbind)
is that winbind is not getting new users from the Domain Controller (windows
2000 native mode).
For example:
wbinfo --sequence (gives 43)
Add user on the DC (user is bob, so NATIVEDOMAIN+bob should now appear in
getent passwd)
getent passwd doesn't show bob,
2003 Jun 30
1
Status of samba 3.0 against Win 2003
I've read in previous messages that Samba 3.0 is supposed to work out of the
box with Win2k3. Is that still planned, or will registry hacks have to be
used?
Also, will Samba 3.0 be able to use a win 2003 server as a Active Directory
server? (I.E., join the domain?)
Thank you,
Tom
2003 Jul 22
0
Everyone group difference between ACL/no ACLs. (follow-up)
More questions! :)
By setting create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 directory security mask
= 0700 I get a sort-of-work around to the issue, but then I can't add the
Everyone group back in! The Everyone group will turn into CREATOR OWNER the
moment I hit "Apply." This creates the following output from getfacls:
# file: tdickson
# owner: tdickson
# group: root
user::rwx
2003 Jul 24
0
3.0.0-beta3-rc1 ADS ticket problems
I've got samba-3.0.0-beta3-rc1 running, and am trying to connect to a
Windows 2000 domain using security = ADS
After following the instructions in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection, I've got
kinit working, and am able to browse the Windows 2000 machines shares with
smbclient //win2kmixed/c\$ -k without a password.
However, if I try to connect to the machine, either through network
neighborhood
2003 Aug 08
1
3.0beta3 ACL show no groups
With Samba 3.0 in PDC mode, I see no groups in the "Add..." windows under
windows 2000 security dialog.
The users are present, but no groups are listed.
Samba 2.2.8 would display Unix groups (in fact it would display them all.)
I can't find any information as to whether or not the smbgroups is what I
need to use.
Am I missing something simple?
My smb.conf:
[global]
2003 Aug 26
0
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 5457 (3.0.0beta3)
By logging into a smbd server with the username "HAENGINEERS\KMR", we are
able to cause a smbd panic every time. Other usernames
("HAENGINEERS\_TestME") work.
The stack trace is below, full logs and smb.conf are available on request
(don't want to saturate the list.)
I can't post to bugzilla as I can't register a new account as my incoming
mail is crippled by
2003 Sep 02
2
Macro expansion in valid users = line?
Hello,
Is it possible to put %U or %S in the valid users line?
I'm trying:
valid users = %D+%U
for a certain homedir setup (automagically creates if non-existent), but the
level 10 logs show that
it always tries: checking |MIXEDDOMAIN+dl| against |%D+%U|, and does not
expand the macro. This is with Samba-3.0.0rc2 (happens with beta3 also.)
Same thing happens with %U or %S.
It worked in
2003 Oct 21
1
Migrating from NT4 auth with winbind to ADS style auth
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there anything special that has to be done to migrate this config?
Right now we're using Samba 3.0 with the old NT4 authentication through
winbind, the same method that samba 2.2.8 used.
If we want to recompile samba and upgrade to the new ADS support, will
winbind correctly continue to use the same Windows Username to Linux UID
mapping so