search for: inline_script

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "inline_script".

2018 Dec 14
2
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 1/3] sh: Implement inline scripts.
...erwise the '-' looks like an option to nbdkit proper rather than a script parameter? Probably not worth a mention that a local file named '-' can still be invoked via [script=]./- (there, script is optional because the leading ./ avoids the leading -). > +static char * > +inline_script (void) > +{ > + const char scriptname[] = "inline-script.sh"; > + char *filename = NULL; > + char *cmd = NULL; > + > + if (asprintf (&filename, "%s/%s", tmpdir, scriptname) == -1) { > + nbdkit_error ("asprintf: %m"); > + goto err;...
2018 Dec 14
0
[PATCH nbdkit 1/3] sh: Implement inline scripts.
...} } +/* This implements the "inline script" feature (script=-). Read stdin + * into a temporary file and return the name of the file which the + * caller must free. For convenience we put the temporary file into + * tmpdir but that's an implementation detail. + */ +static char * +inline_script (void) +{ + const char scriptname[] = "inline-script.sh"; + char *filename = NULL; + char *cmd = NULL; + + if (asprintf (&filename, "%s/%s", tmpdir, scriptname) == -1) { + nbdkit_error ("asprintf: %m"); + goto err; + } + + /* Safe because both the tmpdi...
2018 Dec 15
0
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 1/3] sh: Implement inline scripts.
...the parser. I'll have to do some more investigations. Rich. > Probably not worth a mention that a local file named '-' can still > be invoked via [script=]./- (there, script is optional because the > leading ./ avoids the leading -). > > >+static char * > >+inline_script (void) > >+{ > >+ const char scriptname[] = "inline-script.sh"; > >+ char *filename = NULL; > >+ char *cmd = NULL; > >+ > >+ if (asprintf (&filename, "%s/%s", tmpdir, scriptname) == -1) { > >+ nbdkit_error ("asprintf: %m&...
2018 Dec 14
6
[PATCH nbdkit 0/3] tests: Test export flags (eflags).
Some feature additions to the shell script plugin allow us to test the export flags field reasonably easily. Rich.
2020 Apr 14
0
[nbdkit PATCH v2 1/3] server: Add nbdkit_stdio_safe
...+ b/plugins/sh/sh.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* nbdkit - * Copyright (C) 2018-2019 Red Hat Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Red Hat Inc. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are @@ -116,6 +116,11 @@ inline_script (void) char *filename = NULL; CLEANUP_FREE char *cmd = NULL; + if (!nbdkit_stdio_safe ()) { + nbdkit_error ("inline script is incompatible with -s"); + return NULL; + } + if (asprintf (&filename, "%s/%s", tmpdir, scriptname) == -1) { nbdkit_error (&quo...
2018 Dec 15
5
[PATCH nbdkit v2 0/4] tests: Test export flags (eflags).
v1 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/thread.html#00123 v2: - Document "-" instead of "script=-" and use it in the test; and verify this also works on FreeBSD; and verify that it doesn't depend on the particular behaviour of our wrapper script and should work with installed nbdkit too. - Fix handling of zero flags parameter. -
2020 Apr 04
0
[nbdkit PATCH 1/2] server: Add nbdkit_stdio_safe
...+ b/plugins/sh/sh.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* nbdkit - * Copyright (C) 2018-2019 Red Hat Inc. + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 Red Hat Inc. * * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are @@ -116,6 +116,11 @@ inline_script (void) char *filename = NULL; CLEANUP_FREE char *cmd = NULL; + if (!nbdkit_stdio_safe ()) { + nbdkit_error ("inline script is incompatible with -s"); + return NULL; + } + if (asprintf (&filename, "%s/%s", tmpdir, scriptname) == -1) { nbdkit_error (&quo...
2020 Apr 04
6
[nbdkit PATCH 0/2] stdin/out cleanups
This is what I've been playing with in response to my earlier question about what to do with 'nbdkit -s sh -' (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-April/msg00032.html) I'm still open to ideas on a better name, and/or whether adding <stdbool.h> to our public include files is a good idea (if not, returning int instead of bool is tolerable). Eric Blake (2):
2020 Apr 14
6
[nbdkit PATCH v2 0/3] more consistent stdin/out handling
In v2: - use int instead of bool in the public header - split the tests from the code - don't overload test-layers; instead, add new tests - add a missing fflush exposed by the new tests - other minor cleanups Eric Blake (3): server: Add nbdkit_stdio_safe server: Sanitize stdin/out before running plugin code server: More tests of stdin/out handling docs/nbdkit-plugin.pod |