search for: improvemnts

I am new to Wine and recently tried to get an application to run under Wine. I was able to get the application to work by copying a working Program Files folder to the .wine directory. There were two (really 3) problems. 1) Install Shield failed to work, I gather this is a common problem 2) The App uses a Rainbow Technologies hardware lock. 3) Install Shield for the hardware lock drivers

Hi All We have quite a complex enterprise environment which includes a global domain and lots of little asteroid domains all trusted by the central domain. We have (imaginatively) called this central domain ENTERPRISE. I have configured samba to be an ADS member server successfully, but due to our network design many of the asteroid domains's DC's are uncontactable from our regional

Hi Jason, I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? Also, did you measure how polling affects many VMs talking to each other (e.g. 20 VMs on each host, perhaps with several vNICs each, transmitting to a corresponding VM/vNIC pair on another host)? On a complete separate experiment (busy waiting on storage I/O rings on Xen), I have observed

Hi Jason, I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? Also, did you measure how polling affects many VMs talking to each other (e.g. 20 VMs on each host, perhaps with several vNICs each, transmitting to a corresponding VM/vNIC pair on another host)? On a complete separate experiment (busy waiting on storage I/O rings on Xen), I have observed

Hi I,ve been meaning to write something in praise of wine, and seeing a posting about personal experience of wine is just the excuse I need. the 20031116.tar.gz version, at least for me, is an improvemnt over the previous months version. I am amazed at how well it can run windows programs...well the ones i need. So I think its great and fantastic and hats off to the developers. Nice

Hi, I am trying to fi a glm-poisson model to 400.000 records. I have tried biglm and glmulti but i have problems... can it really be the case that 400.000 are too many records??? I am thinking of using random samples of my dataset..... Many thanks, -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/glm-poisson-fitting-400-000-records-tp3925100p3925100.html Sent from the R help

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected ixgbe

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected ixgbe

On 11/12/2015 06:16 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is > simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added > descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of > time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. > > Test were done through: > > -

Yeah, this is the right place, just ask :) On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Maurizio De Cecco <jmax at dececco.name> wrote: > Hallo, > > i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application, > and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions. > I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ... > > Maurizio De Cecco

Hallo, i am evaluating the possibility of using llvm for an application, and i wondering if this is the right place where to pose questions. I haven't found a llvm users mailing list ... Maurizio De Cecco

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11578 Bug ID: 11578 Summary: Rsync does start with an error directly connecting an USB drive to a port Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

On 11/12/2015 08:02 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? I've also tried 20us. And results shows 50us was better in: - very small packet tx (e.g 64bytes at most 46% improvement) - TCP_RR (at most 11% improvement) But I will test bigger values. In fact, for net itself, we can be

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected

This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected mlx4 - Guest

This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected mlx4 - Guest

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Hi all: This series is an update version (hope the final version) of multiqueue (VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ) support in virtio-net driver. All previous comments were addressed, the work were based on Krishna Kumar's work to let virtio-net use multiple rx/tx queues to do the packets reception and transmission. Performance test show the aggregate latency were increased greately but may get some regression

Hello all: This seires is an update of last version of multiqueue support to add multiqueue capability to both tap and virtio-net. Some kinds of tap backends has (macvatp in linux) or would (tap) support multiqueue. In such kind of tap backend, each file descriptor of a tap is a qeueu and ioctls were prodived to attach an exist tap file descriptor to the tun/tap device. So the patch let qemu to