Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hacked_tinyos_app".
Did you mean:
hacked_tinyos_apps
2009 Mar 26
1
[LLVMdev] secure virtual architecture / safecode
...ic array bounds checking algorithm based on the Omega
> integer programming library, but it is not hugely effective. I think
> this can be strengthened a *lot*.
This is great to hear. I now have extremely high expectations :).
I have put a few apps here:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/~regehr/hacked_tinyos_apps/
These are for compiling only-- they will not run in any useful sense.
They are embedded C code from which I have deleted processor-specific
constructs so that llvm-gcc for x86 can compile them. Lacking actual LLVM
backends for the processors of interest, this seemed the easiest way to
get s...
2009 Mar 26
0
[LLVMdev] secure virtual architecture / safecode
I understand. They only way you can keep the code bloat at a few
percent or less is to aggressively eliminate nearly all run-time
checks. We haven't measured our code size increases but if you have
any codes to send us, we can try to get you some preliminary numbers.
We do have a static array bounds checking algorithm based on the Omega
integer programming library, but it is not
2009 Mar 26
3
[LLVMdev] secure virtual architecture / safecode
Hi Vikram,
I think it's worth continuing to discuss this on-list. I'm interested in
different kinds of embedded software, but specifically in TinyOS
applications.
> We (more accurately, John Criswell and Brice Lin) are working on a
> debugging version of SAFECode right now, which should be robust enough
> to play with soon.
This is great to hear.
I know the SAFECode paper