Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "geta".
Did you mean:
get
2010 Apr 01
4
Scope and assignment: baffling
Hi,
The code below creates a value, x$a, which depending on how you access it
evaluates to its initial value, or to what it's been changed to. The last
two lines should, I would have thought, evaluate to the same value, but they
don't.
f <- function () {
x <- NULL;
x$a <- 0;
x$get.a <- function () {
x$a;
};
x$increment.a <- function () {
x$a <<- x$a + 5;
2013 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] UB in TypeLoc casting
...he Static
> Analyzer, the SVal hierarchy.
>
> So, Ted, how objectionable would it be for me to introduce something
> like (names subject to adjustment):
>
> template<typename T>
> T SVal::castAs();
>
> template<typename T>
> llvm::Optional<T> SVal::getAs();
>
> (the implementations of these functions might involve invoking private
> FooSVal(SVal) ctors in each SVal derived type - so adding a bit of
> boilerplate ctors to all those classes)
>
> and replace "cast<FooSVal>(bar)" with "bar.castAs<FooSVal>...
2010 Nov 17
2
Reference classes: accessor functions via 'getRefClass(...)$accessors(...)'
Hi there,
I''d like to choose between an "static" and "dynamic" access of a reference
class field, say ''a''.
myObj <- getRefClass("Blabla")$new()
Static: myObj$a
Dynamic: myObj$a.get() where the function retrieves the data
from a database (or some other location), stores it to a buffer and
2013 Feb 11
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] UB in TypeLoc casting
...;s another more pervasive use of this pattern in the Static
Analyzer, the SVal hierarchy.
So, Ted, how objectionable would it be for me to introduce something
like (names subject to adjustment):
template<typename T>
T SVal::castAs();
template<typename T>
llvm::Optional<T> SVal::getAs();
(the implementations of these functions might involve invoking private
FooSVal(SVal) ctors in each SVal derived type - so adding a bit of
boilerplate ctors to all those classes)
and replace "cast<FooSVal>(bar)" with "bar.castAs<FooSVal>()" and
dyn_cast with get...
2018 Sep 25
3
[cfe-dev] New warnings when building trunk with GCC 9
...ostream>
#include <memory>
struct A {
A(int) {}
A() { std::cout << "empty constructor"; }
A(const A&) { std::cout << "copy constructor\n"; }
A(A&&) { std::cout << "move constructor\n"; }
};
struct B {
B(A a) {}
};
A getA() { return A(1); }
B run1() {
A a = getA();
return std::move(a);
}
B run2() {
A a = getA();
return a;
}
int main() {
std::cout << "with move:\n";
run1();
std::cout << "no move:\n";
run2();
}
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:07 PM Richard Trieu <rtri...
2002 Dec 05
1
winbind + groups hogs CPU
...hangs for awhile, and then eventually it
times-out on the client side, and the server logs initgroup errors.
Anyone seen this? It is connecting to a rather large AD forest, and I'm
told there are groups with 30+ users in them. When I do a winbind -g
|wc -l I get about 63,210 entries before I geta 0c000233 error (I think
that was it). I tried group enumeration on/off and that doesn't change
anything.
Anyone have other ideas?
Dan
2011 Apr 09
2
best practice(s) for retrieving a local variable from a closure
Greetings,
Say I have defined
mp <- function(a) function(x) x^a
f2 <- mp(2)
and I would like to retrieve the "a" which is local to f2. Two options
come to mind;
get("a", envir=environment(f2))
eval(substitute(a), environment(f2))
I'm curious if one of these is preferred over the other in terms of
efficiency, robustness, aesthetics, etc. Or perhaps
2011 Nov 28
1
Comparing data
...s represent the parameter measured.
I wiuld like to compare the data to see which are more alike. I used the cluster analysis, but now i ma wondering if there are some other methods, since the cluster analysis did not give me the result i like.
I tried to use factanal() for factor analysis but i geta an error saying that it can only be used on numerical data (which is odd since all i have is numerical data).
For factanal i used this code :
DFm<-read.csv("kemijaM.csv", sep=";", dec=".") # input data
DF.m<-as.matrix(DFm)...
2018 Sep 16
2
[cfe-dev] New warnings when building trunk with GCC 9
Yes, we should produce this warning in C++11 mode too. (I could be
misrecalling, but I think the rationale for the current behaviour is based
on historical GCC behaviour.)
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, 10:04 David Blaikie via cfe-dev, <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Fair point made on that thread - that this is a DR, so technically the
> std::move is pessimizing even in C++11 mode.
2008 Apr 15
4
NFS Performance
Hi,
With help from Oleg we got the right patches applied and NFS working
well. Maximum performance was about 60 MB/sec. Last week that dropped
to about 12.5 MB/sec and I cannot find a reason. Lustre clients all
obtain 100+ MB/sec on GigE. Each OST is good for 270 MB/sec. When
mounting the client on one of the OSSs I get 230 MB/sec. Seems the
speed is there. How can NFS and Lustre be tuned
2014 Mar 27
1
[Bug 2218] New: ProxyCommand as both a resolver and connector
...ve as a
resolver. For example, for the given name such command is supposed to
returns the full name that is used for the key lookup and optionally
the ip address and port to connect to. The drawback of this is that the
proxy command may need to duplicate the functionality of a custom
resolver as to geta fully qualified form the resolver may need to
figure out what use to connect to that host.
As a custom resolver may reintroduce the rogue DHCP server problem
discussed in [1], I suppose the returned name should present on
CanonicalDomains list.
[1] -
http://blog.djm.net.au/2014/01/hostname-canoni...
2012 Dec 05
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] UB in TypeLoc casting
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Moving to LLVM dev to discuss the possibility of extending the cast
>> > infrastructure to
2018 Dec 31
4
RFC: Modernizing our use of auto
On Dec 16, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2018 14:43, Stephen Kelly via llvm-dev wrote:
>> However this is a proposal for more modern thinking regarding the permissiveness of auto in LLVM codebases.
>> Currently the rule on the use of auto is here:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the input on this topic,
2012 Nov 30
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] UB in TypeLoc casting
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Moving to LLVM dev to discuss the possibility of extending the cast
> > infrastructure to handle this.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:51 PM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
2017 Jan 02
2
RFC: Allowing @llvm.objectsize to be more conservative with null.
Hi George,
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:41 AM, George Burgess IV
<george.burgess.iv at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments!
>
>> Have you considered changing our existing behavior to match GCC's
>> builtin_object_size instead of adding a new parameter
>
> Yup! My issue with turning `i1 %min` into `i8 %flags` is that
> __builtin_object_size would get