Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "freorder".
Did you mean:
reorder
2006 Oct 10
0
compiling error R-2.4.0
...and have those permission:
-rw-r--r-- 2 root admin 7K Oct 9 09:49 tclConfig.sh
Here is the error produce by ./configure CFLAGS='-O3 -faltivec -fgcse-
sm -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -fsched-interblock -falign-
loops=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-functions=16 -malign-natural -
freorder-blocks -freorder-blocks-and-partition -mpowerpc-gfxopt -
mpowerpc-gpopt -fstrict-aliasing -ftree-vectorize -mtune=G5 -mcpu=G5'
FFLAGS='-O3 -faltivec -fgcse-sm -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -
fsched-interblock -falign-loops=16 -falign-jumps=16 -falign-
functions=16 -malign-natural -f...
2010 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
...cc-patches so I just wanted to double check that there wasn't any
obscure reason to avoid enabling omit-frame-pointer (aside from the degraded
profiling experience). We are already a tad bleeding edge anyway. On darwin10
we leveraged the linkers tolerance for omission of the eh labels to allow
-freorder-blocks-and-partition functional on darwin10 and later.
Jack
2004 Aug 20
2
[kernel-2.4.21-15] rebuild problem
....4
# make menuconfig
< i select my CPU type >
< Exit and save >
# make dep
# make modules
(...no errors ...)
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
-Wno-unused -fomit-frame-poi nter -pipe -freorder-blocks
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=pentium4 -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS
-include /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/modversions.h
-nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DKBUILD_BASENAME=module -c -o module.o
module.c In file included from
/usr/src/linux-2.4.21-15.0.4.EL/include/linux/if.h:...
2010 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
On Aug 16, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Despite the absence of testsuite failures at -m32 or -m64 on either
> i386-apple-darwin10 or x86_64-apple-darwin10, there are still some concerns
> about the origins of the original Mach-O comment above. There also was
> a concern that -fomit-frame-pointer would break Shark but my testing in
> darwin10 suggests it still can profile
2010 Aug 16
3
[LLVMdev] -fomit-frame-pointer on intel darwin
Can anyone shed some light on the origins of the comments...
/* Mach-O doesn't support omitting the frame pointer for now. */
...in gcc/config/i386/i386.c. FSF gcc trunk has enabled the
omit-frame-pointer option as the default for both i386 and x86_64
recently.
* config.gcc: Handle --enable-frame-pointer.
* configure.ac: Add --enable-frame-pointer.
* configure: Regenerated.
*