search for: floresc

...-8859-1; format=flowed > > Rich Adamson wrote: > > > <snip> > > For short runs, the use of cat5 vs proper T1 cables isn't likely to > > have any impact unless there is a fair amount of induction from > > electrical noise, etc. That can take the form of florescent > fixtures, > > transformers, older CRT monitors, etc, etc. > > > > On longer runs, the shielded T1 cables are likely to provide better > > results particularly if there happens to be any electrical noise. > > > > Oh, and if shielded T1 cable is used, th...

Can't anyone stop self-promotion and tell the poor guy what he needs. A T1/E1 X-over cable using an RJ-45 (8-cond.) is pinned out as follows: 1 - 4 2 - 5 3 - NU 4 - 1 5 - 2 6 - NU 7 - NU 8 - NU NU = Not Used I have not in my experience seen any problems with using a Good Quality Cat5 vs. Cat 3 (telco standard) cable for X-connects. YMMV, but you should be fine. As far as the shielding

I've been struggling with a test * install for a couple months now in a small office and am just about ready to give up on it. It's not that the system itself is a problem. I've got everything (attendant, voicemail, FXS extensions, Cisco and Polycom hard-IP phones, and 2 VOIP carriers) working except for the frigging analog FXO interfaces. These things are driving me completely mad.