search for: exptree

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "exptree".

2008 Sep 10
1
Mixed effects model with binomial errors - problem
Hi, We released individual birds into a room with 2 trees. We counted the number of visits to each of the 2 tree. One of the trees is always a control tree and the other tree is either treatment 1, treatment 2 or treatment3 or treatment 4. Ind Treat ContrTree ExpTree Total visits 1 1 11 16 27 1 2 6 9 15 1 3 5 13 18 1 4 11 25 36 2 1 2 3 5 4 1 6 7 13 4 3 4 4 8 4 4 2 5 7 6 1 1 1 2 6 4 5 16 21 etc etc (as you see, not all treatments are included for all individuals) Our question is if the proportion of visits to the experimental tree, in relation to the total num...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/almabench | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/queens | * | * | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: report.libcalls.raw.out Type: application/octet-stream Size: 172287 by...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
....47 * 3.48 | 1.18 5.09 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp | 0.0670 7540 0.0475 * 0.0454 | 6.66 6.85 6.82 * 6.78 | 0.97 0.98 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree | 0.0401 6480 0.0384 * 0.0373 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr | 0.0245 3596 0.0165 * 0.015...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....92 * 2.95 | 1.15 1.50 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp | 0.0360 7596 0.0800 * 0.0560 | 9.76 9.86 10.07 * 9.87 | 0.99 0.97 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree | 0.0400 5964 0.0400 * 0.0440 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr | 0.0280 3644 0.0200 * 0.020...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....91 * 1.88 | 1.70 1.50 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp | 0.0605 7676 0.0430 * 0.0462 | 1.39 1.17 1.47 * 1.58 | 1.19 0.95 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree | 0.0386 6372 0.0352 * 0.0366 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr | 0.0275 3632 0.0164 * 0.017...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
....85 * 1.82 | 2.13 1.63 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp | 0.0266 7728 0.0329 * 0.0224 | 1.21 1.17 1.18 * 1.23 | 1.03 1.03 n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree | 0.0162 6744 0.0179 * 0.0179 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr | 0.0110 3772 0.0081 * 0.007...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...0.56 | 7.96    6.31    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp                                     | > 0.0400 6596     0.0600      *                0.0500      |    1.36    1.03 >  1.00 *           1.08 | 1.32    1.36    n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree                                   | > 0.0300 4936     0.0300      *                0.0300      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.04 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr                                      | > 0.0200 2708     0.0200      *      ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/ > chomp | 0.0400 6596 > 0.0600 * 0.0500 | 1.36 1.03 1.00 > * 1.08 | 1.32 1.36 n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/ > exptree | 0.0300 4936 > 0.0300 * 0.0300 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.04 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/ > misr | 0.0200 2708 > 0.02...
2011 Dec 01
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...759 25.3513 0.0610 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-pc1/enc-pc1.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FBenchmarks%2FTrimaran%2Fenc-pc1%2Fenc-pc1.compile=on> > 1.90% 0.0790 0.0805 0.0002 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FMcGill%2Fexptree.compile=on> > 1.90% 0.0790 0.0805 0.0003 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/3...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...ator MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-tbl/unix-tbl MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/vcirc/vcirc SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shoot...
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...01 7598 exception_spec_test.ll 6 12901 0 0.01 12882 0 0.01 12882 except.ll 22 34884 1 0.01 34475 0 0.01 34856 execute.ll 9 103710 0 0.02 103690 0 0.02 103690 expand.ll 12 165069 0 0.03 165039 0 0.02 165039 explicit_gop.ll 9 132820 0 0.02 132799 0 0.02 132799 exp.ll 9 74590 0 0.02 74573 0 0.01 74573 exptree.ll 14 45103 0 0.01 45086 0 0.01 45669 ExtractCallbackConsole.ll 23 69339 0 0.01 69303 0 0.01 69303 ExtractingFilePath.ll 10 43215 0 0.01 43180 0 0.01 43180 Extract.ll 16 222180 2 0.02 221097 2 0.02 220070 factor.ll 2 9199 0 0.01 9176 0 0.01 9176 Falign.ll 10 474854 0 0.04 474839 0 0.05 474839 famil...