search for: essentialy

Hi, I' m experiencing many problems with oplocks break failure and Error: no route to host.essentialy onto \profiles dir and \netlogon dir. So My clients cannot update many files on the SAMBA/PDC and cannot read the NTconfig.pol file to update their policies. I have many PC that are old computers with Win2k and have an Antivirus and are slower machines ... This problem less occurs on newer machin...

...l, I've been battling this for weeks. I have one samba server joined to our windows 2k3 domain that is happily using Active Directory for authenication via Winbind and kerberos. Ok great, but now I want to have two Samba boxs on the domain with consistant uid/rid mapping between. My question essentialy is can two samba servers use share a common uid/rid idmap when joined to a Windows 2k3 domain. If the answer is "yes, with LDAP" Then my question is how does the Active Directory user info get into that LDAP db? No howto I've seen, goes beyond the one server configuration. If you kno...

Hi! I'm running a Samba server at a University Department. I'd like to let my users change their "Samba password" through SWAT. So i've done a few hacks in swat.c Nothing much, essentialy i've adapted the interface and removed the other stuff. I don't have password sync between Samba and the system, because i want to let my users have separate passwords. Well... As far as i can see, to initially login to SWAT, one must provide the system password... Not the Samba passwo...

I wrote a ruby script that parses a file into key-values like so: class Parser table = { } IO.foreach(''Localizable.strings'') { |line| if line =~ /^ \s* " (.*?) " \s* = \s* " (.*?) "/x table[ $1 ] = $2 end } end I want to store the key-values in different colums on my database so that when I enter a key, it gives me the corresponding value...how

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:58:30PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote: > If there is no hook registering to inode_init_security, theoretically > the LSM infrastructure should return -EOPNOTSUPP, which causes ocfs2 to > set si->enable to zero, and not execute the line that causes the kernel > to panic. > > The problem would arise if somehow the LSM infrastructure returns zero, >

.... Recently, I got the idea to run the emergency server under a different server name parallel to the main server so that users can easily recover deleted files etc. This lead to massive problems; the reason was that the clients randomly connected to the main or the backup server ! The setup is essentialy this : Main server : DNS : mainserver.local.domain IP : 192.168.2.1 NETBIOS name : MAINSERVER - master browser - domain master Backup Server : DNS : backupserver.local.domain IP : 192.168.2.2 NETBIOS name : BACKUPSERVER - no master browser - no domain master What happened is that I run the backu...

...ask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:group:tls:rwx default:group:ptls:r-x default:mask::rwx default:other::--- When I create a file in it, it inherits the containing directory's default ACLs and it's ACL mask is set to rw- (for directory it would be rwx), which essentialy marks it not executable. > touch test # getfacl test # file: test # owner: root # group: root user::rw- group::rwx #effective:rw- group:tls:rwx #effective:rw- group:ptls:r-x #effective:r-- mask::rw- other::--- The problem arises when I create another file from...

If you start Rterm/Rgui from the cmd (NT4.4) command line, the .Rhistory and .RData files are created/used in the current directory. I think, R should honor HOME or even the USERPROFILE variable. Regards Karl PS: is this the correct list for such reports or would it be better to use r-devel? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list --

If you start Rterm/Rgui from the cmd (NT4.4) command line, the .Rhistory and .RData files are created/used in the current directory. I think, R should honor HOME or even the USERPROFILE variable. Regards Karl PS: is this the correct list for such reports or would it be better to use r-devel? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list --

...that included components a = 1120 and P = 286379470. When I called KalmanLike with a copy of a copy of that argument, KalmanLike changed all those copies plus one other, tst23. The only copy that KalmanLike did NOT change was "unlisted", tst23u. The function "KalmanLike" essentialy consists of a call to '.Call("KalmanLike", ...)', and I'm not eager to trace this behavior into that ".Call". Would anyone care to comment on this behavior? 2. I'm trying to recreate Figure 2.1 in Durbin and Koopman (2001), cited in the KalmanLike help f...

hi, i am new to xen. pls. guide me what is best os should be used with xen. also let me know if there is any baremetal xen hypervisor available as i read that i require one OS on which xen hypervisor will be installed. want to use it with 32 bit machine. thanks for your help. -- With Best Wishes Balwant _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list

In porting some Common LISP code to R, I am trying to found out whether special care must be taken for the let* function. In Common LISP, "the let* block is like let except it is guaranteed to evaluate the initialization of its local variables in sequentially nested scopes, i.e. it provides an order to the binding and visibility of preceding variables.". I have included the recursive

...otplug out the VF >and hotplug in a virtio at the same bus device and function number and >just let udev take care of renaming it for us. The idea was supposed >to be a seamless transition between the two interfaces. Alex. What you are trying to do in this patchset and what netvsc does it essentialy in-driver bonding. Same thing mechanism, rx_handler, everything. I don't really understand what are you talking about. With use of team you will get exactly the same behaviour.

I have a function in R that takes another function as argument: f <- function(g, ...) { #g is expected to be a function } I want to see if there is a way to implement "f" in C and calling it from R using ".C" interface. I know that I can use function pointers for my C implementation, but I imagine it's going to be nearly impossible to pass a function from R to C. Are

Hello, I am running SAMBA 2.0.7.0 on AIX 4.3.3.0 I have a 1 Tera Byte filesystem on AIX made available to NT and MAC. There is heavy IO activity on this filesystem and all of a sudden the NT's and MAC's can't read or write any file on this shared filesystem. Also AIX is running out of memory whenever this happens and files cannot be copied onto the said filesystem even at unix

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 11:33:56PM CET, kubakici at wp.pl wrote: >>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:14:10 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:

...and hotplug in a virtio at the same bus device and function number and >>just let udev take care of renaming it for us. The idea was supposed >>to be a seamless transition between the two interfaces. > > Alex. What you are trying to do in this patchset and what netvsc does it > essentialy in-driver bonding. Same thing mechanism, rx_handler, > everything. I don't really understand what are you talking about. With > use of team you will get exactly the same behaviour. So the goal of the "in-driver bonding" is to make the bonding as non-intrusive as possible and re...

...and hotplug in a virtio at the same bus device and function number and >>just let udev take care of renaming it for us. The idea was supposed >>to be a seamless transition between the two interfaces. > > Alex. What you are trying to do in this patchset and what netvsc does it > essentialy in-driver bonding. Same thing mechanism, rx_handler, > everything. I don't really understand what are you talking about. With > use of team you will get exactly the same behaviour. So the goal of the "in-driver bonding" is to make the bonding as non-intrusive as possible and re...

...tio at the same bus device and function number and >>>just let udev take care of renaming it for us. The idea was supposed >>>to be a seamless transition between the two interfaces. >> >> Alex. What you are trying to do in this patchset and what netvsc does it >> essentialy in-driver bonding. Same thing mechanism, rx_handler, >> everything. I don't really understand what are you talking about. With >> use of team you will get exactly the same behaviour. > >So the goal of the "in-driver bonding" is to make the bonding as >non-intrusiv...