search for: enable_msi

Hi, between March 16 and now, bge on a Sun X2200 stopped working, turning off msi (via hw..pci.enable_msi=0) got it working again. I tried first replacing bge with an older version but that did not help. please advice :-) Danny

Hello, I need some advice how to debug this issue ... Recently I got a new mainboard for a router, it's a Gigabyte GA-H77N-WIFI with two onboard re(4) NICs. The problem is that re0 works fine and re1 doesn't: It doesn't receive any packets. Tcpdump displays all outgoing packets, but no incoming ones on re1. Ifconfig shows the link correctly (100 or 1000 Mbit, depending on where I

...15 snd_hda_intel,snd_seq_oss,snd_seq,snd_pcm_oss,snd_usb_audio,snd_mixer_oss,snd_pcm,snd_rawmidi,snd_timer,snd_seq_device,snd_hwdep soundcore 11553 1 snd So I remembered the bug rh introduced with the 194 kernels and nvidia chipsets (not my case but I'm desperate) and added the enable_msi=0 so that my modprobe.conf is now <snip> options snd cards_limit=8 alias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intel options snd-hda-intel index=0 enable_msi=0 but it still will not work. <rant> I am getting frustrated at the retrograde steps that seem to be hitting kernel and 5.x upgrades lately. yum...

...; on bge3 bge3: Ethernet address: 2c:76:8a:54:08:17 Searching other bug reports and posts, I've tried: hw.bge.allow_asf="0" hw.pci.enable_msi="0" But it didn't help. Any ideas? If I don't use the loader.conf settings above, I also get (before the watchdog timeouts): bge0: 2 link states coalesced bge0: 2 link...

...hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) rev 5 (82541PI)' class = network subclass = ethernet (no device listing for em0) Swapping the PCI card with a PCI-X version gives the same behaviour. Setting hw.pci.enable_msix and hw.pci.enable_msi to 0 doesn't help in either case.

Hi all, I have installed a centos 6.2 x86_64 box to use as a multimedia center. All works ok, except sound over hdmi using nvidia graphics card. My lspci output: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS880 Host Bridge 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge (ext gfx port 0) 00:06.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] RS780 PCI to PCI bridge

So, just today I noticed a problem with kernel 2.6.18-194 (CentOS 5.5) on several Intel DP965LT systems; the system beeps (such as terminal beeps) are no longer passed through to the external speakers. This is a problem because in our situation the boxes are distant from their monitor/keyboard, the system speaker on this motherboard is extremely weak, and there are no system speaker header pins

Sorry for the repost... I don't think the first one posted.. posted to freebsd.stable, freebsd-current, Freebsd-hardware I checked the hardware in the online documentation manual/hardware It only lists the bits and peices of the machine say the hard drive controller and so forth. but doesn't give you a particular system to look at as a working machine with FreeBSD 6.2 does anybody

...d0] = VPD cap 05[a8] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 1 fatal 0 non-fatal 0 corrected ecap 0004[138] = unknown 1 PCI-e errors = Fatal Error Detected Unsupported Request Detected Fatal = Unsupported Request Also, any reason NOT to set hw.tws.enable_msi=1 in /boot/loader.conf ? ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/

Hello, freebsd-stable. Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production system? I want to build storage server for my home: RAW photos, multi-layer PhotoShop files and FLAC-encoded music consume a lot of space, and they should be availible both from desktop & notebook. Also, all photo-content is unique, so I need some insuranse from single HDD crash. I understand,

On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when > > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be > >