search for: descriptores

On 2017?09?10? 13:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This is an update from v2 version. > Changes: > - update event suppression mechanism > - add wrap counter: DESC_WRAP flag in addition to > DESC_DRIVER flag used for validity so device does not have to > write out all used descriptors. Do we have benchmark result to show the advantage of DESC_DRIVER over e.g avail/used

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with

Greetings all, Anyone done any work on these products? I have several (a couple of different models) that are rebranded Ultra in the US. Using explore with usbhid returns some significant quantities of data and I've done some captures with usbsnoop. I've also asked Ultra to get me the HID definition that was used for them, in the hopes I don't have to usbsniff all the setting

Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] On > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v3 > [...] > * Batching

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:08:29AM +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:44:35AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: >> >> Get it now. Please correct me if I missing something. >> >> >> Flags status hints, >> >> - DESC_DRIVER only: driver owns the descriptor w/o available info ready for device to use >> >> - DESC_DRIVER |

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:08:29AM +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:44:35AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: >> >> Get it now. Please correct me if I missing something. >> >> >> Flags status hints, >> >> - DESC_DRIVER only: driver owns the descriptor w/o available info ready for device to use >> >> - DESC_DRIVER |

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > >

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > This is an update from v1

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:16:38AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:05:07AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:16:38AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:05:07AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On

> -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 8:58 PM > To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann at redhat.com> > Cc: Liang, Cunming <cunming.liang at intel.com>; Steven Luong (sluong) > <sluong at cisco.com>; virtio-dev at

> -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Wednesday, October 4, 2017 8:58 PM > To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann at redhat.com> > Cc: Liang, Cunming <cunming.liang at intel.com>; Steven Luong (sluong) > <sluong at cisco.com>; virtio-dev at

Get it now. Please correct me if I missing something. Flags status hints, - DESC_DRIVER only: driver owns the descriptor w/o available info ready for device to use - DESC_DRIVER | DESC_WRAP: driver has prepared an available descriptor, device hasn't used it yet - None: device has used the descriptor, and write descriptor out - DESC_WRAP only: shall not happen, device make sure to clear

Get it now. Please correct me if I missing something. Flags status hints, - DESC_DRIVER only: driver owns the descriptor w/o available info ready for device to use - DESC_DRIVER | DESC_WRAP: driver has prepared an available descriptor, device hasn't used it yet - None: device has used the descriptor, and write descriptor out - DESC_WRAP only: shall not happen, device make sure to clear

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:58AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi all, I wanted to raise the question of similarities between virtio > and new zero copy af_packet interfaces. > > First I would like to mention that virtio device development isn't spec > limited - spec is there to help interoperability and add peace of mind > for people worried about IPR. > > So

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:58AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi all, I wanted to raise the question of similarities between virtio > and new zero copy af_packet interfaces. > > First I would like to mention that virtio device development isn't spec > limited - spec is there to help interoperability and add peace of mind > for people worried about IPR. > > So