search for: decept

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1122 Bug ID: 1122 Summary: --list command can be deceptive in some cases. Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org...

The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. Can someone explain what runPass is for? Thanks, Dan

...(0,0,0,1,0,0,1,1,0),nrow=3) > z<-matrix(c(0,1,0,0,1,0,1,0,0),nrow=3) > x[z]<-y[z] The resultant matrix x is all zeros except for the last two diagonal cells which are 1's. While y is lower triangualr 0's with the remaining cells all ones. I really don't understand how this deceptively simple looking piece of code is giving that result can someone explain please. I'm obviously missing something pretty basic so please keep your answer suitably basic. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Confused-by-code-tp4643946.html Sent from the R help mail...

Hi, I have data that is on a log base 2 scale. It goes from negative factors of 2 to positive ones. I am using barplot. However, I don't want the data centered at 0 - I want the min of the yaxis to be just below the lowest value in the data. The plots are kind of deceptive switching between positive and negative. I see that barplot has a log option, but that doesn't seem to be adjustable for a log base 2 scale. Does anyone know how to adjust the x-axis, so it's at y= -value rather than at y=0? I''d rather not add a factor to the data, unless I c...

...lution? > (insn-level metadata for vptr store and module-level metadata for DTORs) > > > Using instruction level metadata for this would be appropriate.  However, I > also don't understand why a race on this is truly benign. It isn't, really; calling it "benign" is deceptive. It's just that storing a pointer which is equal to the existing pointer stored at a given address almost always makes the optimizer/codegen generate code which can't trigger the race in a way which visibly misbehaves. Therefore, as a heuristic users apparently want ThreadSanitizer to i...

>> Using instruction level metadata for this would be appropriate. However, I >> also don't understand why a race on this is truly benign. > > It isn't, really; calling it "benign" is deceptive. It's just that > storing a pointer which is equal to the existing pointer stored at a > given address almost always makes the optimizer/codegen generate code > which can't trigger the race in a way which visibly misbehaves. > Therefore, as a heuristic users apparently want...

Hi list, I?ve been struggling with nut some time to get it to do as I wish without any succes. Nut configured as a "client": Can upsmon catch events and do actions in upssched-cmd? Like " onbatt) shutdown blabla" After a reload configs of upsmon syslog gives me: Jun 26 16:06:44 pascal-desktop upsmon[1037]: Reloading configuration Jun 26 16:06:44

When a validates_asssociated fails... I get something like Address is invalid is there a way, preferably on a per-association basis to have the error messaage include the actual error like Zipcode is too long (max is 10 characters) _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org

Quick question - how come the function.prototype.bind doesn''t allow for return values? Am I missing some basic understanding of how this works? I searched and couldn''t find an answer. Specifically, I''m binding an object method to an existing form''s onSubmit, but it still actually submits the form, refreshing the page - which is not what I want. If change

On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that > isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a > PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass > does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. > Can someone explain what runPass is for? Only BasicBlockPass uses it....

On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > > On Mar 7, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > >> The virtual function Pass::runPass is a little deceptive; a pass that >> isn't a ModulePass can be run on a Module when run from a >> PassManager, but calling runPass(Module *) with the same pass >> does nothing. Also, runPass doesn't appear to be used anywhere. >> Can someone explain what runPass is for? > > Onl...

...ration how to automatically test code that interacts with the user (popups, drag & drop) or a server. Michael -- Michael Schuerig Nothing is as brilliantly adaptive mailto:michael@schuerig.de as selective stupidity. http://www.schuerig.de/michael/ --A.O. Rorty, The Deceptive Self

...t I thought I ought to know for certain. (An observation: I think the quantity of questions and bugs raised along the lines of "I did open file, ov_open, ov_read, close file, open another file, ov_read, and it exploded", or "I tried to make vorbisfile go in [some language with a deceptively C like stdio] and it didn't work" are probably due to the asymmetry in the callback set - there are callback hooks for read, seek, tell and close, but none for open. Is there any particular reason for this? (I realize it's to late in the day to fix the API in any fashion, but...

...The only practical downsides of void are when newcomers take C's syntax for functions with no arguments a little too literally, or when they try to create pointers to void. But these problems are quickly caught and easily corrected. Replacing void with {} will actually make the language more deceptive, because if newcomers think {} is LLVM's spelling for C's void, they might be tempted to use {}* for C's void*, and nothing will stop them except mysterious bugs if they do arithmetic. On the purity side, replacing void with {} has the side effect of emphasising an odd asymmetry in...

...g network, the database application runs slowly (access data) in this client machine and in others NT machines that are added to the LAN. If i substitute this samba server with a Win2k3 Standard Server, the application latency backs to the original (or close), before the NT clients. This was a big deception to me and since then, i'm trying to find why this happens but i'm specialist. I have observed in the ethereal sniffer that exists a lot of "Locking AndX Request" and "Locking AndX Response" that is highly "ping pong" communication between the server and the...

...MATLAB). There are two fixed parameters and a random environmental effect that is linked to a first order lagged correlation fixed parameter. Are there any examples of fitting this model I could follow? Cheers Norm Good Fisheries Biologist (Mathematician) Southern Fisheries Centre PO Box 76, Deception Bay Q 4508 telephone 3817 9588, fascimile 3817 9555 ********************************DISCLAIMER**************************** The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only...

On Mar 20, 2012, at 12:51 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Using instruction level metadata for this would be appropriate. However, I >>> also don't understand why a race on this is truly benign. >> >> It isn't, really; calling it "benign" is deceptive. It's just that >> storing a pointer which is equal to the existing pointer stored at a >> given address almost always makes the optimizer/codegen generate code >> which can't trigger the race in a way which visibly misbehaves. >> Therefore, as a heuristic users...

Hi, I noticed the recent commit adding Match support to ssh(1). I look forward to giving it a try, but I have some initial feedback based on ssh_config.5 and an examiniation of match_cfg_line(). First, the "command" keyword could be a little deceptive. Although the man page makes the use of this keyword quite clear, my initial assumption was that the intent was to match against the remote command that is being requested. That would seem to be a more natural interpretation of this keyword. Instead it is an arbitrary local test. Perhaps "l...

...C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 r1 120 240 360 480 600 r2 120 240 360 480 600 r3 120 240 360 480 600 $C C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 r1 140 280 420 560 700 r2 140 280 420 560 700 r3 140 280 420 560 700 $D C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 r1 160 320 480 640 800 r2 160 320 480 640 800 r3 160 320 480 640 800 However, quite deceptively > sapply(v, myF, y = 2*(1:5)) A B C D [1,] 100 120 140 160 [2,] 100 120 140 160 [3,] 100 120 140 160 [4,] 200 240 280 320 [5,] 200 240 280 320 [6,] 200 240 280 320 [7,] 300 360 420 480 [8,] 300 360 420 480 [9,] 300 360 420 480 [10,] 400 480 560 640 [11,] 400 480 560...

Hi, Can we export the samba audit logs (Authentication & Authorisation Logs) to Windows Event Viewer? I am trying to export the authentication & authorisation logs to a Windows Server to be shown in Windows Event Viewer. I read the link - https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Event_Logging. But couldn't follow much. Can someone throw more light on the procedure, if it is possible? --