search for: connectiion

Hi NUT-Users, we work with a GE LP 33 UPS and an Advanced SNMP WEB Interface Card. This card supports the RFC1628 Definition. So I think this combination work together with NUT and the snmp-driver, correct? I installed the networkupstools on my Debian Sarge with apt-get (nut & nut-snmp). After configuration I start the upsd and upsmon. I get following output in /var/log/syslog: ... Aug 3

...not to be routed. This scheme works almost fine, 10.10.100.100/24 addresses are really being routed through ppp0, 10.10.100.101/24 through ppp1 and 192.168.1.0/24 (3 Servers) through ppp0. BUT the router itself (192.168.1.4) has no route to any host. I get "network is unreachable" to any connectiion attempt from 192.168.1.4. And I can''t connect to this router from outside, because the packets have no route to be sent back. I thought that there is different routing politics for localhost and added default route to "local" table. 192.168.1.4 has started to have the route, but...

At the moment I have 2 network connected in a VPN and I'm planning to extend this. Actual status: Network A has a public IP Network B is behind a provider-scale NAT. Actually I'm using openvpn with a single UDP connection from B to A, and hosts inside Network A can communicate with B. I tried with tinc, and I saw tinc has to go TCP-Only for accomplish this. This is because Tinc