search for: circumstantially

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "circumstantially".

Did you mean: circumstantial
2014 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
> I disagree on this. Table emission by itself doesn't involve code > generation and I don't think it makes sense as a per function attribute > either. You either want it for all functions or only when needed (e.g. > exceptions are possible). As such, it makes perfect sense to me as a > global flag. It has to be an attribute because of LTO. You can LTO a file compiled with
2004 Apr 20
1
Samba 2.2.7 and Windows XP
.../pw to map LPT1 to a queue located on ITSELF!! The PDC is RedHat 9 with current updates (kernel 2.4.20-28.9, Samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0, Cups 1.1.17-13.3.0.3). The majority of the clients on this network are Win98 or Win NT4. All these older clients have no problem mapping either drives or printers. Circumstantially, the finger seems to point to the XP workstation in some way, especially its inability to map a printer located on itself. Does anyone know of anything peculiar about XP and printer mapping?? Of course, I'd love to have someone offer up a magic bullet solution, but even a suggestion for a d...
2018 Oct 08
3
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all, Just thought I'd update this thread in case anyone else is Googling trying to find out how to do this... I found the solution to my problem to be to use the IAXVAR() function to pass the accountcode between the Asterisk boxen and update the CHANNEL(accountcode) with that variable. Thanks to Richard @ Digium for the reply that clarified my misunderstanding. Calum On Wed, 2018-10-03
2013 Mar 07
1
tracking user activity - Active Directory
Hello, Some mischief happened and I have been asked if I can find out who was logged into their computers within a specific off-hours time frame. My logs for that time frame happened to be running at debug level 3, so I have been looking through them and trying to figure out how to recognize a workstation login. I find lines beginning with auth_check_password_send that seem like reasonably good
2008 Oct 29
0
problems with opensuse 11 running xen on a Sun X4150
Hello I am running opensuse 11 on a Sun x4150 32GB RAM 2 quad x86_64 E5450''s. It has a SAS PCI-Express LSI 3081E Host Bus Adapter (a rebranded Adaptec RAID 5805 it seems) running in a RAID 5 config. Xen in this setup is 3.2.1. The kernel is 2.6.25.18 The problem I have is that when I try to run a the xen kernel the RAID device is not found . I get messages on the console of
2020 Feb 20
4
GPO redirected folders reg path issue
Hi all, I have an issue at multiple sites that has been plaguing me for a while. My goto setup for AD w/windows desktops is to employ roaming profiles with redirected folders and a few mapped drives; all via GPO. And that's pretty much it. 3 GPOs linked to the entire domain with authenticated users as security filter. The file servers are a domain member and serve both the file shares and
2014 Feb 10
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
On 10 February 2014 03:44, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 10 February 2014 02:59, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> It has to be an attribute because of LTO. You can LTO a file compiled >> with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables and one with >> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables. That is why we have the uwtable >>
2009 Sep 27
1
Optional libraries (libtiff, etc) not found
I installed the (binary) biOps package, which can use libtiff and libfftw. Then I used macports to install the libraries (in /opt/local/lib). But I restart R and biOps still does not see the libraries. I've tried adding symbolic links from /opt/local/lib to /usr/local/lib, I've added /opt/local/lib to LIBRARY_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH, and it doesn't work. Do you
2015 Mar 11
7
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
On 11 March 2015 at 04:14, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Just to rebase things a bit, here is some context. > > - This is a 60+ email thread spreading across a month of time. > - I've not read every single email and I don't think it makes sense to > assume the context of the first email applies to the most recent. I think we all agree that
2006 Jul 03
4
Printing - using WINE
Hello out there, perhaps anybody has some idea for my problem. I've had several nice successes with WINE. GoogleEarth e.g. or some of my old tools of the windows-times. Now yesterday I've sent my tax-declaration (in Germany: ElsterFormular) to the tax-administration, online. BUT: I couldn't print the declaration!! NOTHING at all happened. I havn't ever tried to print, it was not
2003 Aug 15
1
Netware CIFS nlm - linux samba
Dear Gurus, We're having bizarre problems/behaviour. Admittedly we have an unusual set-up: - users on linux desktops (RedHat/KDE) mounting files over SMB using samba-2.2.5-10 -client and -common rpms. - files are on a SAN, clustered behind 2 netware servers (6.5), wihch run the cifs.nlm (netware guy has gone home - can't tell you the version just now) Files are spontaneously
2015 Mar 11
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
On 10 March 2015 at 21:08, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As for the advantages, this seems to make it easier to drop the >> autoconf build, which would be a really big win for us. > > > My only problem here is this: it *seems*.
2005 Feb 24
3
Suggestion: SSHD pseudo/fake mode. Source available.
Hi, SSH brute force attacks seem to enjoy increasing popularity. Call me an optimist or a misrouted kind of contributer to the community, but on our company server I actually go through the logs and report extreme cases to the providers of the originating IP's. With the increasing number of these attacks, however, I have now decided that it's better to move the SSHd to a different
2015 Mar 11
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raise minimum required CMake version to 3.0
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > However, everyone seems to think I'm advocating we never move the CMake > > version forward. That isn't what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is > that > > moving the CMake version forward has a cost. Not a huge insurmountable > cost, > > but non-zero