search for: c5t0d0

...0 insufficient replicas raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2d0p2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data c5t0d0 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data PLEASE HELP! I''m desperate! Aaron Berland This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hello, What is the access algorithm used within multi-component pools for a given pool, and does it change when one or more members of the pool become degraded ? examples: zpool create mtank mirror c1t0d0 c2t0d0 mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c5t0d0 c6t0d0 or; zpool create ztank raidz c1t0d0 c2t0d0 c3t0d0 raidz c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c6t0d0 As files are created on the filesystem within these pools, are they distributed round-robin accross the components, or do they stay with the first component till full then go to the next, or is some other tech...

...tion 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller pci bus 0x0088 cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller c5*, c6* and c7* are the eSATA disks. zpool create -f zfsatan mirror c5t0d0 c5t1d0 mirror c5t2d0 c5t3d0 mirror c6t0d0 c6t1d0 mirror c6t2d0 c6t3d0 mirror c7t0d0 c7t1d0 mirror c7t2d0 c7t3d0 zfs create zfsatan/fs01 -bash-3.2# time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024x1024x1024 count=8 of=/zfsatan/ fs01/storfil 8+0 records in 8+0 records out real 2m58.863s user 0m0.001s sys...

Hi all, I recently created a RAID-Z1 pool out of a set of 7 SCSI disks, using the following command: # zpool create magicant raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 c5t6d0 It worked fine, but I was slightly confused by the size yield (99 GB vs the 116 GB I had on my other RAID-Z1 pool of same-sized disks). I thought one of the disks might have been to blame, so I tried swapping it out - it turned out my replacement disk was...

Ciao, the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk: bash-3.2# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c0t7d0 AVAIL c1t6d0 AVAIL c1t7d0 AVAIL is it possible to add a mirror to it? I seem to be able only to add a new PAIR of disks in mirror, but not to add a mirror to the existing disk ... thanks tommaso...

Solaris and/or ZFS are badly confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0" names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they''ve gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does it only delete excess? Reason I believe it''s confused: zpool status shows mirror-0 on c9t3d0, c9t2d0, and c9t5d0. But format sho...

...ions. scrub: resilver completed after 0h41m with 0 errors on Sat Jan 9 22:54:11 2010 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM array03 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t16d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t17d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t18d0 ONLINE...

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...ne 446 of ../common/libzfs_pool.c ********* reply to customer ******************** It looks like you have an additional unwanted software layer between Solaris and the disk hardware. Currently ZFS needs to access the physical device to work correctly. Something like: # zpool create -f extdisk c5t0d0 c5t1d0 ...... Let me know if this works for you. ************* follow-up question from customer ************ Yes, using the c#t#d# disks work, but anyone using fibre-channel storage on somethink like IBM Shark or EMC Clariion will want multiple paths to disk using either IBMsdd, EMCpower or Sola...

Hello, I was hoping that this would work: http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I cant delete/backup somewhere else) > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool create -f ambry raidz1 c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c5t1d0 > /dev/lofi/1 > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > ambry 592G 132K 592G 0% ONLINE - I get this (592GB???) I bring the virtual device offline, and it becomes degraded, yet I wont be able to copy my data over. I was...

...tried SXDE 1/08 creating the following pool: -bash-3.2# zpool status -v tank pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors All went well until I tried pulling files from...

Hi, Experts: A customer has X4500 and the boot drives mirrored (c5t0d0s0 and c5t4d0s0) by SVM, The ZFS uses the two other partitions on these two drives(c5t0d0s3 and c5t4d0s3). If we need to replace the disk drive c5t0d0, do we need to do anything on the ZFS (c5t0d0s3 and c5t4d0s3) first or just follow the regular boot drive replacement procedure? Below is the s...

...rrors on Fri Sep 7 18:39:03 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM home DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ON...

...rs I should switch over to 2008.05. I thought I would simply just be able to install 2008.05 over top of Sol10U5 and import / upgrade the pool and move on. Indeed I probably can do that, but it didn''t quite go as planned... So under U5, the boot devices (mirrored w/ SVM) were c0t1d0 and c5t0d0, I exported the zpool and rebooted. Through the ILOM''s Java console I mounted the 2008.05 iso and booted from it. When the OS came online, I quickly started the installer and selected the device labeled c0t1d0 to as the installation target.... this was rather stupid on my part.... After...

...rds plugged into 6 mini-sas backplanes - card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with the potential look-aside cache bug... - though its not clear this is related... My First Thought To Debugging This ------------------------------------------------ Afte...

...9;'. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-2Q scan: scrub repaired 0 in 0h2m with 0 errors on Thu Oct 7 17:46:54 2010 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool DEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0s0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors pool: xxx1 state: ONLINE scan: scrub repaired 0 in 30h34m with 0 errors on Mon Oct 11 06:44:59 2010 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM xx...

...ade''. Once this is done, the pool will no longer be accessible on older software versions. scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zp1 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors to one of my external USB drives holding pool bu...

...PERC 5/i controller 6 x 15K SAS DRIVEs with ZFS RAIDZ1 configuration. I shared the zfs partitions and mounted them on VMWare. Everything is great till I have to write to the disks. It won''t write! Steps I took creating the disks 1) Installed mega_sas drivers. 2) zpool create tank raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 3) zfs create -V 1TB tank/disk1 4) zfs create -V 1TB tank/disk2 5) iscsitadm create target -b /dev/zvol/rdsk/tank/disk1 LABEL1 6) iscsitadm create target -b /dev/zvol/rdsk/tank/disk2 LABEL2 Now both drives are lun 0 but with uniqu VMHBA device identifiers. SO the...

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but