search for: c4t5d0

...0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0...

...but I post it here since some people where seeing something similar. Example and attached zdb output: filer01a:/$ uname -a SunOS filer01a 5.11 snv_130 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zpool create zpool01 raidz2 c4t0d0 c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t4d0 c4t5d0 c4t6d0 filer01a:/$ zfs list zpool01 NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT zpool01 123K 5.33T 42.0K /zpool01 filer01a:/$ df -h /zpool01...

...DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t11d0 ONLINE 0 0...

...c4t4d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE...

...c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c1t6d0...

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0...

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t10d0 ONLINE...

...c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t10d...

...n ... c4t0d0 Soft Errors: 0 Hard Errors: 0 Transport Errors: 0 Vendor: FUJITSU Product: MBA3073RC Revision: 0103 Serial No: Size: 73.54GB <73543163904 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 0 Recoverable: 0 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c4t5d0 Soft Errors: 4 Hard Errors: 24 Transport Errors: 179 Vendor: ATA Product: ST3750330NS Revision: SN04 Serial No: Size: 750.16GB <750156374016 bytes> Media Error: 0 Device Not Ready: 0 No Device: 22 Recoverable: 4 Illegal Request: 0 Predictive Failure Analysis: 0 c4t6d0...

...t; c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t6d0 ONLINE...

...of them all populated - system has three AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards plugged into 6 mini-sas backplanes - card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with the potential look-aside cache bug... - though its not clear this is related... My First Thought To Debuggi...

...c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ** Heres the resilver spare ONLINE 0 0 0...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...wo Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i] the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests: [i] root at sun1 # ./filebench filebench> load fileserver 12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21 21:18:52 personality successfully loaded 12746: 7.445: Usage: set $dir...

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but