search for: bylo

HI, The question is a ZFS performance question in reguards to SAN traffic. We are trying to benchmark ZFS vx VxFS file systems and I get the following performance results. Test Setup: Solaris 10: 11/06 Dual port Qlogic HBA with SFCSM (for ZFS) and DMP (of VxFS) Sun Fire v490 server LSI Raid 3994 on backend ZFS Record Size: 128KB (default) VxFS Block Size: 8KB(default) The only thing

...t;>> `net'' specified >>And you put that in your rules file? yes, a put it earlier, but I have in policy file : fw net ACCEPT so from rules file it wasn''t working : REJECT fw net tcp 901 REJECT fw net udp 901 -- ---- Oferta jakiej jeszcze nie bylo! Serwer www 60 MB za 96 zl rocznie Szczegoly: www.oferta.alpha.pl ----

...No browseable = No create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0711 ;admin users = piotrbrudny nt acl support = no [profiles] path = /profiles read only = no writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No guest ok = no profile acls = no ;nt acl support = no #a bylo acls=yes csc policy = disable # next line is a great way to secure the profiles force user = %U valid users = %U @"Domain Admins" @users map acl inherit = yes [printers] comment = Network Printers #printer admin = @"Print Operators" guest ok = yes...