search for: buildarch

...  # normaly you change things to match the system more and you change the changelog, in this case, not done, this was a quick test. apt-get source samba -b     #Setup a file apt to install you new builded samba,  use this script. cat << EOF >> apt.sh #!/bin/bash   set -e   PWD=`pwd`   BUILDARCH=$(dpkg-architecture -q DEB_BUILD_ARCH) echo "Processing for Arch: ${BUILDARCH}"   if [ ! -e /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list ]; then     echo "deb [trusted=yes] file:${PWD} ${BUILDARCH}/" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list fi   if [ ! -d ${BUILDARCH} ]; then     m...

...e and you change the > changelog, in this case, not done, this was a quick test. > apt-get source samba -b > > > #Setup a file apt to install you new builded samba, use this script. > cat << EOF >> apt.sh > #!/bin/bash > > set -e > > PWD=`pwd` > > BUILDARCH=$(dpkg-architecture -q DEB_BUILD_ARCH) > echo "Processing for Arch: ${BUILDARCH}" > > if [ ! -e /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list ]; then > echo "deb [trusted=yes] file:${PWD} ${BUILDARCH}/" > > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list > fi > >...

On another clean install (with all updates) of Ubuntu Server 16.04.3, trying your line of dependencies fails: Package libgpgme-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'libgpgme-dev' has no installation candidate E: Unable to locate package

...ive/build-samba Change this to the folder where you created the 01-xx 02-xx folders. And put this script below in this folder. ## SCRIPT START update-local-repo.sh #!/bin/bash set -e if [ -z ${1} ] then echo "Error, Missing the folder with the .deb files as \$1" exit 1 fi BUILDARCH=$(dpkg-architecture -q DEB_BUILD_ARCH) echo "Processing for Arch: ${BUILDARCH}" if [ ! -e /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list ]; then echo "deb [trusted=yes] file:/home/pbuilder/archive/build-samba ${BUILDARCH}/" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/file-repo.list fi if [ ! -d...

greetings i have a newer centos 4.2 server using qmail for smtp the /etc/yum.conf has this in it exclude=spamassassin exim postfix sendmail so when i do a yum update to go to 4.3 i get this --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: smtpdaemon for package: mdadm --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: smtpdaemon is needed by package mdadm how

...s.d/CentOS-cr.repo my spec file is /usr/local/rpmbuild/SPECS/centos-release-cr-ihc.spec the contents of which are: Summary: Package to set up IHC use of the centos-cr repository Name: centos-release-cr-ihc Version: 1 Release: 1 Source0: centos-release-cr-ihc-1.tar.gz License: GPL Group: IHC-config BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-buildroot %description Package to set up IHC use of the centos-cr repository %prep %setup -q %build %install install -m 0755 -d /etc/yum.repos.d install -m 0755 etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-cr.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-cr.repo %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post...

...sr/include/efi/inc.mak rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/make.inf rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/makefile.hdr rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/make.inf rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/makefile.hdr rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/readme.txt ifeq ($(buildarch),ia64) rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/ia32 rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/x84_64 else rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/ia64 endif [...] Debian will copy *everything* from inc. When it is an ia64 system, they will remove the ia32 and x84_64 headers (so you should...

...sions compared to those built on CentOS 3, 4 and 5. The problem is that %defattr overrides %attr on directories. Have a look at this example spec file: --%<--------------------------------- Summary: foo Name: mini Version: 0.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Group: System Environment/Daemons License: GPLv2+ BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root %description foo %prep %install %{__install} -d %{buildroot}/XXX %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %attr(0730,root,nobody) %dir /XXX --%<--------------------------------- The rpm file list build on EL5 looks like this: drwx-wx---...

...rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/make.inf > rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/makefile.hdr > rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/make.inf > rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/makefile.hdr > rm debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/protocol/readme.txt > ifeq ($(buildarch),ia64) > rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/ia32 > rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/x84_64 > else > rm -rf debian/gnu-efi/usr/include/efi/ia64 > endif > > [...] > > Debian will copy *everything* from inc. When it is an ia64 system, > they will...

...--without-gnome \ --enable-R-profiling \ --enable-R-shlib \ --enable-memory-profiling \ --without-recommended-packages \ --build $(buildarch) $(atlas) draws its value from the rules file atlas = --with-blas Similarly, $(lapack) lapack = --with-lapack I rebuilt the debian packages with the source from lennycran and, as in Ubuntu, there's no libRblas.so. $ dpkg -c r-base-core_2.10.1-2~lennycran.0_i386.deb |...

Dear R developers, I just compiled the latest version of R (2.12.1) and noticed that 'libRblas.so' is missing in the '/x86_64/src/extra/blas' subdirectory of my R-installation. Did I miss ongoing discussions on the Mailinglist about this or might it be a local problem? Thanks for this brilliant software. Best Christian -- Christian Kohler Institute of Functional Genomics ~

...4 - -%description stateful -Provides the oVirt Node functionality needed to convert an existing -host into a Node in a stateful manner. Presently intended for use on -the host running the oVirt Appliance. - -%package logos -Summary: oVirt Node Logos -Group: System Environment/Base -BuildArch: noarch -Obsoletes: redhat-logos -Provides: redhat-logos = 10.0.1-1 -Provides: system-logos = 10.0.1-1 -Conflicts: fedora-logos -Conflicts: generic-logos -Conflicts: fedora-logos -Conflicts: anaconda-images <= 10 -Conflicts: redhat-artwork <= 5.0...

Hello, I am writing you about the GNU R-Project, as part of by effort to help GNU projects provide a better, more consistent build system. Currently, your project does not support the DESTDIR variable in generated Makefiles (marked as optional in the GNU coding policies, make and automake manual). In my opinion, DESTDIR support can be very helpful for the user, the distribution-specific

...rsion: 1.20.0x.13 Release: 1 License: GPL Group: System Environment/Kernel # Need to unzip driver archive and convert to tgz URL: ftp://ftp.areca.com.tw/RaidCards/AP_Drivers/Linux/DRIVER/CentOS/CentOS-5.0 Source: arcmsr.redhat.%{version}.tgz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root BuildArch: noarch Requires: gcc Requires(post): dkms Requires(preun): dkms %description Driver (Linux kernel module) for Areca RAID Controllers. %prep %setup -n arcmsr.redhat.%{version} %build %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %define dkms_name arcmsr %define dkms_vers %{version}-%{release} %define qu...

Hello, macosx 10.13.6, Rdevel r76458 I'm trying to compile against openblas to reproduce an error on the CRAN check page (my package is clean under winbuilder and all but one of the checks). I've downloaded and installed openblas 0.3.7 but I am not 100% sure that it is being used by R. Using ./configure --with-blas="-lopenblas" Then running R to discover the PID I get:

I've attempted to use the optimized GotoBLAS2 library with a freshly compiled R-2.11.1 patched on 64-bit Ubuntu 10.4. (See details below). When I run this version of R, the timings are not different than the original install, and only one core is used in test computations. Can someone point out my error? Thanks. --Dale Details ... I'm running the 64-bit version of Ubuntu 10.04 on my 2

...33a903d 100644 --- a/ovirt-node.spec.in +++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ Requires: python-gudev Requires: PyPAM Requires: ethtool Requires: cracklib-python +Requires: dracut +%if 0%{?rhel} +# for applying patches in %post +Requires: patch +%endif BuildArch: noarch @@ -90,6 +95,7 @@ make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} %{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{mgmt_scripts_dir} %{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/cron.d %{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d +%{__install} -d -m0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/drac...

Hello, All! Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.src.rpm with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc) Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups) Is using

Maybe that is https://reviews.llvm.org/D30171. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Dmitry Golovin <dima at golovin.in> wrote: > Hi, > > I can't build the Linux kernel anymore. With the latest kernel source and > latest LLVM and LLD (with D30163) I can only get this error message when > linking vmlinux: > > ld.lld: error: unable to move location counter backward >

modified ovirt-node-image for inclusion in Fedora Removes ovirt-node-image-pxe sub package adds get-ovirt-node-image script adds generate-ovirt-node-pxe-tree script (replaces subpackage) moved all the scripts/tools into tools subdir adds new rpm, ovirt-node-recipe includes tools, manifests, and ks file/recipe Process for building upstream ovirt node packages.... 1. Build ovir-node.rpm in koji